CONTRACTOR SELECTION AT PREQUALIFICATION STAGE: CURRENT EVALUATION AND SHORTCOMINGS

Authors

  • Pooria Rashvand Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhd Zaimi Abd Majid UTM Construction Research Centre, Institute of Smart Infrastructure and Innovative Construction, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mahmoud Baniahmadi Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Farzan Ghavamirad Department of Environment and civil Engineering, University of Auckland, 1010, New Zealand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6403

Keywords:

Contractor selection, Prequalification criteria, Management Capability, Management variables

Abstract

The selection of a suitable contractor for a construction project is one of the most important decisions a client can make for the development of the project. Prequalification is a procedure to examine and gauge the competency and skills of contractors to successfully complete a project if it is given to them. However, the evaluation employed for some prequalification is still ambiguous or highly subjective. This study aims to investigate the shortcoming of the current prequalification evaluation for contractor selection. The methodology of the study is based on a comprehensive literature review and expert survey whereby the criticality of data, obtained from the literature was analysed using expert in the field. Among the prequalification criteria, the current evaluation that employed for management capability is highly ambiguous. Two important shortcomings of current prequalification models regarding the evaluation of management capability were identified. First, the models are not comprehensive since all the variables related to the management capability are not included. Secondly, the models focused almost exclusively on time and cost performance as outcome variables, which may not be enough to evaluate the management capability of contractors. Better evaluation methods have to be developed to assess the management capability prequalification as it has a major impact on time and cost performance of contractors. Therefor future study must be conducted to develop a model that evaluates the management capability of contractors based on the relative variables for the purpose of improving current prequalification selection.

References

Alarcón, L. F., Mourgues, C. 2002. Performance Modeling For Contractor Selection. Journal of Management in Engineering. 18: 52-60.

Yeung, J. F., Chan, A. P., Chan, D. W. 2009. Developing a Performance Index For Relationship-Based Construction Projects In Australia: Delphi Study. Journal of Management in Engineering. 25(2): 59-68.

Trivedi, M. K., Pandey, M. K. and Bhadoria, S. S. 2011. Prequalification of Construction Contractor using a FAHP. International Journal of Computer Applications. 28(10).

Hatush, Z., and Skitmore, M. 1997b. Criteria for Contractor Selection. Construction Management and Economics. 15(1): 19-38.

Ng, S. T. and Skitmore, R. M. 1999. Project Owner And Consultant Perspectives Of Prequalification Criteria. Building and Environment. 34: 607-21.

Merna, A., Smith, N. J. 1990. Bid Evaluation For UK Public Sector Construction Contracts. In ICE Proceedings. 88(1): 91-10).

Hunt, H. W., Logan, D. H., Corbetta, R. H., Crimmins, A. H., Bayard, R. P., Lore, H. E., and Bogen, S. A. 1966. Contract Award Practices. Journal of the Construction Division Proceeding of ASCE. 92(C01): 1-16.

Essex, D. W., Fox, J. A., and Groom, J. M. 1981. The Development, Factor Analysis, And Revision Of A Client Satisfaction Form. Community Mental Health Journal. 17(3): 226-235.

Majid, M. Z., W. Z. Zakaria, H. Lamit, A. Keyvanfar, A. Shafaghat, and E. S. Bakti. 2012. Construction Information Systems For Executive Management In Monitoring Work Progress. Advanced Science Letters. 15(1): 169-171.

Rashvand, P., Majid, M. Z. A., Pinto, J. K. 2015. Contractor Management Performance Evaluation Model At Prequalification Stage. Expert Systems with Applications. 42(12): 5087-5101.

Anagnostopoulos, K. P., and Vavatsikos, A. P. 2006. An AHP Model For Construction Contractor Prequalification. Operational Research. 6(3): 333-346.

Manideepak, G and Bhatla, A and Pradhan, B. 2009. Methodologies for Contractor Selection. In Construction Industry, ACSGE. BITS Pilani, India.

Hatush, Z., Skitmore, M. 1997a. Assessment and Evaluation Of Contractor Data Against Client Goals Using PERT Approach. Construction Management & Economics. 15(4): 327-340.

Plebankiewicz, E. 2009. Contractor Prequalification Model Using Fuzzy Sets. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 15(4): 377-385.

Huang, X. 2011. An Analysis Of The Selection Of Project Contractor In The Construction Management Process. International Journal of Business and Management. 6(3): 184.

Aje, I. O. 2008. The Impact Of Contractors’prequalification And Criteria Of Award On Construction Project Performance In Lagos And Ahuja. Nigeria (Doctoral Dissertation, Federal University Of Technology Akure).

Publicly Available Specification (PAS 91). 2013. Construction Prequalification Questionnaires, Published By British Standard Institution.

Aje, O. I., Odusami, K. T., Ogunsemi, D. R. 2009. The Impact Of Contractors' Management Capability On Cost And Time Performance Of Construction Projects In Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction. 14(2): 171-187.

Wong, C. H., Nicholas, J., Holt, G. D. 2003. Using Multivariate Techniques For Developing Contractor Classification Models. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 10(2b): 99-116.

Fong, P. S. W., and Choi, S. K. Y. 2000. Final Contractor Selection Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process. Construction Management and Economics. 18(5): 547-557.

Cheng, E. W., and Li, H. 2004. Contractor Selection Using The Analytic Network Process. Construction Management and Economics. 22(10): 1021-1032.

Turskis, Z., Tamošaitienė, J., and Zavadskas, E. K. 2008. Contractor Selection Of Construction In A Competitive Environment. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 3: 181-187.

Wong, C. H. 2004. Contractor Performance Prediction Model For The United Kingdom Construction Contractor: Study Of Logistic Regression Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering And Management. 130(5): 691-698.

Ajibade, A. O. 2006. The Impact Of Contractors Management Capability On Construction Project Performance In Nigeria. Unpublished B.Tech. dissertation, Federal University of Technology, Akure.

Odusami, K. 2002. Perceptions Of Construction Professionals Concerning Important Skills Of Effective Project Leaders. Journal of Management in Engineering. 18: 61-67.

Budget Monitoring and Price Intelligent Unit. 2005. The ABC of the Contract Due Process Policy. A Manual on Public Procurement Reform Programme in Nigeria. 1st ed. Government Press, Abuja.

Abiola, R. O. 2000. Management Implications Of Trends In The Construction Cost In Nigeria. The Quantity Surveyor. 30: 35-40

McCaffer, R. 1979. Bidding Behaviour. Quantity Surveying (New Zealand). 6-13.

Harris, F., McCaffer, R. and Edum-Fotwe, F. 2006 Modern Construction Management (Paperback ed.). Location: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Kometa, S. T., and Olomolaiye, P. O. 1997. Evaluation of Factors Influencing Construction Clients' Decision To Build. Journal of Management in Engineering. 13(2): 77-86.

Assaf, S. A., and Al-Hejji, S. 2006. Causes Of Delay In Large Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management. 24(4): 349-357.

Mansfield, N. R., Ugwu, O. O., Doran, T. 1994. Causes of Delay And Cost Overruns In Nigerian Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management. 12(4): 254-260.

Chan, D. W., Kumaraswamy, M. M. 1997. A Comparative Study Of Causes Of Time Overruns In Hong Kong Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management. 15(1): 55-63.

Al-Momani, A. H. 2000. Construction Delay: A Quantitative Analysis. International Journal of Project Management. 18(1): 51-59.

Lam, K. C., Ng, S. T., Tiesong, H., Skitmore, M., Cheung, S. O. 2000. Decision Support System For Contractor Preâ€Qualification—Artificial Neural Network Model. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management. 7(3): 251-266.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-23

How to Cite

CONTRACTOR SELECTION AT PREQUALIFICATION STAGE: CURRENT EVALUATION AND SHORTCOMINGS. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(16). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6403