SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC HOUSING TRANSFORMATION IN THE CONVERGENCE OF EMIC AND ETIC PARADIGMS

Authors

  • Abubakar Danladi Isah Faculty of Built Environment, Department of Architecture, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Tareef Hayat Khan Faculty of Built Environment, Department of Architecture, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6444

Keywords:

Etic and emic, transformation, public housing, culture, sustainability

Abstract

Recent studies on the global ideology of public housing are significantly focused on the cultural values of inhabitants. Thus rapid transformation of originally design housing units that are based on modern standards by inhabitants is widespread. The emic and etic principles was used to evaluate existing situation where indigenous culture inclusive housing demand is on the rise. Retrospectively, established principles of emic and etic concept in directing public housing design was measured to test the synthesis- an interphase thought to provide sustainability amidst conflicting indigenous space demand and regulated homogenous designs. The study uncovered a chaotic but culture-specific genesis that comprise of formalized antecedents that can no longer be ignored, but lacks standardisation. Instead, the etic and emic interphase (convergences) remains a delusion proffering unintended solutions. Implacably, rigour in the concept of culture bonds sustainability process in public housing, hence its standardization is required to be undertaken in order to clarify and process the potentials of the alternative (the intersection) to the etic and emic approaches

References

Sofield, T. H. B. 2010. The Presentation and Imagery of Indigenous and Ethnic Minorities for Tourism through Touristic Media International Austronesian Conference. Taipei, Taiwan.

Helfrich, H. 1999. Beyond the Dilemma of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Resolving the Tension between Etic and Emic Approaches. Cuture and Psychology. 5(2): 131-153.

Mantaziaris, C. and Martin, D. F. 2000. Native Title Corporations: A Legal and Anthropological Analysis. Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR).

Habibis, D., Memmott, P., Phillips, R., Go-Sam, C., Keys, C. and Moran, M. 2013. Housing Conditionality, Indigenous Lifeworlds And Policy Outcomes: Towards A Model For Culturally Responsive Housing Provision. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.

Ogu, V. I. and Ogbuozobe, J. E. 2001. Housing Policy In Nigeria: Towards Enablement Of Private Housing Development. Habitat International. 25(4): 473-492.

Lym, G. R. 1980. A Psychology Of Building: How We Shape And Experience Our Structured Spaces. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Tipple, G. 2000. Extending Themselves: User Initiated Transformations Of Government-Built Housing In Developing Countries. Liverpool University Press.

Ikejiofor, U. 1998. If Past Traditions Were Building Blocks; A Perspective On Low Income Housing Development In Nigerian Cities. Building and Environment. 34(2): 221-230.

Choguill, C. L. 2007. The Search For Policies To Support Sustainable Housing. Habitat International. 31(1):143-149.

Rusalic, D. 2009. Making the Intangible tangible: The new Interface of Cultural heritage. 63. Institute of Ethnography Sasa, Sanu: Belgrade.

Tang, Z. and Ng, S. T. 2014. Sustainable Building Development in China–A System Thinking Study. Procedia Engineering. 85: 493-500.

Winston, N. and Eastaway, M. P. 2008. Sustainable Housing in The Urban Context: International Sustainable Development Indicator Sets And Housing. Social Indicators Research. 87(2): 211-221.

Pitt M., Tucker, M., Riley, M. and Longden, J. 2009. Towards Sustainable Construction: Promotion and Best Practices. Construction Innovation. 9(2): 201-224.

[14] Isah, A. D., Khan, H. T. and Ahmad, A. S. 2014. Exploring Socio-Economic Design Implications of Public housing Transformation. The Nigerian Experience. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 584-586: 211-216.

Tipple, A. G., Owusu, S. E. and Pritchard, C. 2004. User-Initiated Extensions in Government-Built Estates in Ghana and Zimbabwe: Unconventional but Effective Housing Supply. Africa Today. 51(2): 79-105.

Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H. and Dasen, P. R. 1992. Cross-cultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Isah, A. D., Khan, T. H. and Ahmad, A. S. 2015. Discovering Design Implications of Public Housing Adjustment Benefits in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Behaviour and Social Sciences CRC Press. 361-365.

Van-Gent, W. P. C. 2010. Housing Context and Social Transformation Strategies in Neighbourhood Regeneration in Western European Cities. International Journal of Housing Policy. 10(1).

Shari, Z. and Soebarto, V. 2012. Delivering Sustainable Building Strategies in Malaysia: Stakeholders' Barriers and Aspirations. ALAM CIPTA. International Journal of Sustainable Tropical Design Research and Practice. 5(2): 3-12.

UN-Habitat 2003. Guide to Monitoring Target 11: Improving The Lives Of 100 Million Slum Dwellers Progress Towards The Millennium Development Goals. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlement Programme.

Harris, J. M. 2000. Basic Principles of Sustainable Development. Tufts University: Medford, MA

Downloads

Published

2015-11-25

How to Cite

SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC HOUSING TRANSFORMATION IN THE CONVERGENCE OF EMIC AND ETIC PARADIGMS. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(14). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6444