TWO-DIMENSIONAL DC RESISTIVITY MAPPING FOR SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION USING SOFT COMPUTING APPROACHES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6466Keywords:
DC resistivity, 2-D mapping, inversion problem, radial basis function, multi-layer perceptron, neural networkAbstract
In geophysical subsurface surveys, difficulty to interpret measurement of data obtain from the equipment are risen. Data provided by the equipment did not indicate subsurface condition specifically and deviates from the expected standard due to numerous features. Generally, the data that obtained from the laws of physics computation is known as forward problem. And the process of obtaining the data from sets of measurements and reconstruct the model is known as inverse problem. Researchers have proposed multiple estimation techniques to cater the inverse problem and provide estimation that close to actual model. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of using artificial neural network (ANN) in solving two- dimensional (2-D) direct current (DC) resistivity mapping for subsurface investigation, in which the algorithms are based on the radial basis function (RBF) model and the multi-layer perceptron (MLP) model. Conventional approach of least square (LS) method is used as a benchmark and comparative study with the proposed algorithms. In order to train the proposed algorithms, several synthetic data are generated using RES2DMOD software based on hybrid Wenner-Schlumberger configurations. Results are compared between the proposed algorithms and least square method in term of its effectiveness and error variations to the actual values. It is discovered that the proposed algorithms have offered better performance in term minimum error difference to the actual model, as compared to least square method. Simulation results demonstrate that proposed algorithms can solve the inverse problem and it can be illustrated by means of the 2-D graphical mapping.
References
Lesmes, D. P., and Friedman, S. P. 2005. Relationships Between Electrical And Hydrogeological Properties Of Rocks And Soils. Hydrogeophysics, Water Science and Technology Library. Springer. 50: 87-128.
Binley A., and Kemna, A. 2005. DC Resistivity and Induced Polarization Method. Hydrogeophysics, Water Science and Technology Library. Springer. 50: 129-156.
Slater, L., and Lesmes, D. P. 2002. IP Interpretation in Environmental Investigations. Geophysics. 67: 77-88.
Roberge, P. R. 2006. Corrosion Basics: An Introduction. 2nd edition. NACE Press Book.
Annan, A. P. 2005. GPR Methods For Hydrogeological Studies. Hyrdogeophysics, Water Science and Technology Library. Springer. 50: 185-214.
Van Overmeeren, R. A. 1998. Radar Facies Of Unconsolidated Sediments In The Netherlands: A Radar Stratigraphy Interpretation Method For Hydrogeology. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 40: 1-18.
Paine, J.G. and Brian R. S. Minty. 2005. Airborne Hydrogeophysics. Hyrdogeophysics, Water Science and Technology Library. Springer. 50: 333-357.
Dahlin, T. 2000. The Development Of DC Resistivity Imaging Techniques. Computer and Geosciences. 27: 1019-1029.
Loke, M. H. 2001. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D Electrical Imaging Surveys. Available in website.
Prieto, G. A. 2009. Geophysical Inverse Theory. Universidad de Los Andes.
Neyamadpour, A., Taib, S. and Wan Abdullah W. A. T. 2009. Using Artificial Neural Network To Invert 2D DC Resistivity Imaging Data For High Resistivity Contrast Regions: A MATLAB Application. Computers & Geosciences. 35: 2268-2274.
Wahid, H. 2010. Radial Basis Function Neural Network Metamodelling For 2D Resistivity Mapping. Proc. of International Symposium on Automation and Robotic in Construction (ISARC 2010).
Fernandez Martinez, J. L. 2010. PSO: A Powerful Algorithm To Solve Geophysical Inverse Problems Application To A 1D-DC Resistivity Case. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 71: 13-25.
Loke, M. H. and Dahlin, T. 2002. A Comparison Of The Gauss-Newton And Quasi-Newton Methods In Resistivity Imaging Inversion. Journal of Applied Physics. 49: 149-162.
Khosravi, A. and Nahavandi, S. 2009. Developing Optimal Neural Network Metamodels Based on Prediction Intervals. Proc. of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June 14-19, IEEE Explore. 1583-1589.
Wahid, H., Ha, Q.P., Duc, H., Azzi, M. 2013. Meta-modelling Approach For Estimating The Spatial Distribution Of Air Pollutant Levels. Journal of Applied Soft Computing. 13: 4087-4096.
Crino, S. and Brown, E. 2007. Global Optimization With Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics. 37(2): 333-340.
Xie, D., Sun, X., Bai, B. Yang, and S. 2008. Multiobjective Optimization Based on Response Surface Model and its Application to Engineering Shape Design. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 44(6): 1006-1009.
Broomhead, D. S., and Lowe, D. 1998. Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks. Complex Systems. 2: 321-355.
Loke, M. H. 2009. Res2Dinv and Res3dinv Software Version 3.59. Geoelectrical Imaging 2D&3D, Penang, Malaysia.
Available at:
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.