NON-PARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR INTELLIGENT PNEUMATIC ACTUATOR

Authors

  • Abdulrahman A. A. Emhemed College of Electronic Technology-Bani Walid, 38645, Libya
  • Rosbi Mamat Department of Control and Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Ahmad ‘Athif Mohd Faudzi Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Robotics (CAIRO), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6560

Keywords:

Non-Parametric Identification, PTn Model, Intelligent Pneumatic Actuator (IPA)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present experimental, empirical and analytic identification techniques, known as non-parametric techniques. Poor dynamics and high nonlinearities are parts of the difficulties in the control of pneumatic actuator functions, which make the identification technique very challenging. Firstly, the step response experimental data is collected to obtain real-time force model of the intelligent pneumatic actuator (IPA). The IPA plant and Personal Computer (PC) communicate through Data Acquisition (DAQ) card over MATLAB software. The second method is approximating the process by curve reaction of a first-order plus delay process, and the third method uses the equivalent n order process with PTn model parameters. The obtained results have been compared with the previous study, achieved based on force system identification of IPA obtained by the (Auto-Regressive model with eXogenous) ARX model. The models developed using non-parameters identification techniques have good responses and their responses are close to the model identified using the ARX system identification model. The controller approved the success of the identification technique with good performance. This means the Non-Parametric techniques are strongly recommended, suitable, and feasible to use to analyze and design the force controller of IPA system. The techniques are thus very suitable to identify the real IPA plant and achieve widespread industrial acceptance.

References

Zhu, Y. 1998. Multivariable Process Identification for MPC: the Asymptotic Method and Its Applications. Journal of Process Control. 8(2): 101-115.

Hjalmarsson, H. 2003. From Experiments to Closed Loop Control. In 13th IFAC Symposium on System Identification. 1-14.

Astrom, K. J. and T. Bohlin. 1965. Numerical Identification of Linear Dynamic Systems from Normal Operating Records. IFAC Symposium on Self-Adaptive Systems. Teddington, England.

Ho, B. L. and R. E. Kalman. 1965. Effective Construction of Linear State-Variable Models from Input-output Functions. Regelungstechnik. 12: 545–548.

M. Gevers. 2006. A Personal View of the Development of System Identification. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. 26(6): 93-105.

S. Skogestad. 2003. Simple Analytic Rules for Model Reduction and PID Controller Tuning. Journal of Process Control. 13: 291–309.

Pavković, D., Polak, S., Zorc, D. 2014. PID Controller Auto-Tuning Based on Process Step Response and Damping Optimum Criterion. ISA Trans. 53(1): 85-96.

Khairuddin Osman, Ahmad 'Athif Mohd Faudzi, M.F. Rahmat, Nu'man Din Mustafa, M. Asyraf Azman, Koichi Suzumori. 2012. System Identification Model for an Intelligent Pneumatic Actuator (IPA) System. IROS 2012.

Omer Faris Hikmat, Ahmad 'Athif Mohd Faudzi, Mohamed Omer Elnimair, Khairuddin Osman. 2014. PI Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy and Receding Horizon Position Control for Intelligent Pneumatic Actuator. Journal Teknologi. 67(3).

Hanafi, D., M. Than, A. A. A. Emhemed, Mulyana, T., A. Zaid, A. Johari. 2011. Heat Exchanger’s Shell and Tube Modeling for Intelligent Control Design. IEEE 3rd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN).

Osman, K., Faudzi, M., Rahmat, M. F., & Suzumori, K. 2014. System Identification and Embedded Controller Design for Pneumatic Actuator with Stiffness Characteristic. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.

Shih, M. C., & Tseng, S. I. 1995. Identification and Position Control of a Servo Pneumatic Cylinder. Control Engineering Practice. 3(9): 1285-1290.

Jouppila, V., S. A. Gadsden, and A. Ellman. 2010. Modeling and Identification of a Pneumatic Muscle Actuator System Controlled by an On/Off Solenoid Valve. Workshop Proceedings of the 7th International Fluid Power Conference, Aachen, Germany. 167-182.

Cajetinac, S., D. Seslija, S. Aleksandrov, and M. Todorovic. 2012. PWM Control and Identification of Frequency Characteristics of a Pneumatic Actuator using PLC controller. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika. 123(7): 21-26.

Tassa, Y., Wu, T., Movellan, J., Todorov, E. 2013. Modeling and Identification of Pneumatic Actuators. Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA). IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2013. 437-443.

Athif Mohd Faudzi, A., Osman, K., Fua'ad Rahmat, M., Suzumori, K., Din Mustafa, N. M., & Asyraf Azman, M. 2013. Real-time Position Control of Intelligent Pneumatic Actuator (IPA) System Using Optical Encoder and Pressure Sensor. Sensor Review. 33(4): 341-351.

Emhemed, A. A. A., Mamat, R., Faudzi, A. A. M. 2015. A New Predictive Control Technique for Force Control of Pneumatic Actuator Plant. The 10th Asian Control Conference (ASCC 2015), Sabah, Malaysia. In Press.

Clarke, D. W., Mohtadi, C., Tuffs, P. S., 1987. Generalized Predictive Control-Part I. The Basic Algorithm. Automatica. 23: 137-148.

Ishak, A. A., & Hussain, M. A. Open-loop Process Identification: Reformulation of Response Rate Calculation. In Proceeding of Regional Symposium on Chemical Engineering. P-PC. 39-1.

Bartelt, T. 2006. Instrumentation and Process Control. Cengage Learning.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-01

How to Cite

A. A. Emhemed, A., Mamat, R., & Mohd Faudzi, A. ‘Athif. (2015). NON-PARAMETRIC IDENTIFICATION TECHNIQUES FOR INTELLIGENT PNEUMATIC ACTUATOR. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(20). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6560