MODELLING THE TRILOGY OF INNOVATION, LEARNING AND PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Sri Gustina Pane Faculty of Economy, USIU Medan, Indonesia
  • Dileep Kumar M University Institute for International and European Studies, University Gorgasali, Georgia, Europe
  • Muhammad Siddique Department of Business Administration, University of Punjab, Gujranwala Campus.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6665

Keywords:

Performance, organizational innovation, organizational learning.

Abstract

Recently, organizations are looking the ways to enhance their performance through innovation and learning. Most organizations are enhancing innovation to increase performance and to get a competitive advantage. However, very few studies are focused to investigate the role of organizational learning in the context of organizational innovation and performance. Current study aimed to investigate the mediating role of organizational learning between the relationship of the organizational innovation and performance. A random sample of 212 employees of the banking sector was selected to collect data. Results indicated that organizational learning significantly mediates the relationship of the organizational innovation and performance. Thus, a study was conducted to assess the presence of organizational learning can enhance the organizational performance in the presence of organizational innovation. 

References

Montes, F. L., Moreno, A. R., and Morales, V. G. 2005. Influence of Support Leadership on Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Examination . Technovation. 25: 1159-1172.

DiBella A, Nevis E, Gould J 1998. Understanding Organizational Learning Capability. Journal of Management Studies. 33: 361–79.

Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics Of Innovation. Oxford university press.

Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. 1996. Organizational Learning IT: Theory, Method and Practice, Addisonâ€Wesley, Reading, MA.

McGill ME, Slocum JW, Lei D.1992. Management Practices in Learning Organizations. Organizational Dynamics. 21(1): 5-17.

Bass BM. 1999. Two Decades of Research and Development in Transformational Leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 8(1): 9-32.

Garcia-Morales, V. J., Jimenez-Barrionuevo, M. M., and Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L. 2012. Transformational Leadership Influence on Organizational Performance through Organizational Learning and Innovation. Journal of Business Research. 65: 1040-1050.

Kurt Matzler, Erich Schwarz , Natasa Deutinger and Rainer Harms. 2012. The Relationship between Transformational Leadership, Product Innovation and Performance in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneueship. 21(2): 139-151

Gumusluoglu L, İlsev A. 2009. Transformational Leadership, Creativity, and Organizational Innovation. Journal of Business Research. 62(4): 461–73.

Tushman ML, Nadler DA. 1986. Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review. 28(3): 74–92.

Tierney P, Farmer SM, Graen GB. 1999. An Examination of Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Relevance of Traits and Relationships. Academy of Management Journal. 41(4): 464–76.

Calantone RJ, Cavusgil TS, Zhao Y. 2002. Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management. 31:515–24.

Hurley, R. F., and Hult, G. T. M. 1998. Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. The Journal of Marketing. 42-54.

Zollo, M., and Winter, S. G. 2002. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science. 13(3): 339-351.

Senge, P. M. 1990. The fifth discipline: Five practices of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

Koontz, H. and Donnell, C. 1993. Introduction to Management. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York Lawal, A.A. 1993 Management in Focus, Lagos: Abdul Industrial Enterprises

McCloy, R. A. Campbell, J. P. and Cudeck, R. 1994 A Confirmatory Test of a Model of Performance Determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology . 79(4): 493-505.

Forrester, R. H. 2000. Capturing learning and applying knowledge: an investigation of the use of innovation teams in Japanese and American automotive firms. Journal of Business Research. 47(1): 35-45.

Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 128-152.

Maastricht Economic Research Institution Innovation and Technology (MERIT). 1992. Annual Report. University of Limburg.

Yli-Renko H, Autio E, Sapienza HJ. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal. 22, 587–61

Damanpour F. 1991. Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal. 34: 555 – 90

Meeus MTH, 2001. Oerlemans LAG, Hage J. Patterns of interactive learning in a high-tech region. Organization Studies. 22:145–72.

Inkpen AC, Crossan MM. 1995. Believing is seeing: joint ventures and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies. 32:595–618.

Irwin JG, Hoffman JJ, Lamont BT. 1998. The effect of the acquisition of technological innovations on organizational performance: a resource-based view. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 15: 25-54

Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA. 2000. International expansion by New Venture firms:international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal. 43, 925–50.

Lööf H, Heshmati A. 2002. Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm-level innovation study. International Journal of Production Economics. 76:61–85.

Yasir, M., Imran, R., and Irshad, M. K. 2013. Mediating Role Of Organizational Climate In The Relationship Between Transformational Leadership, Its Facets And Organizational Performance. Actual Problems of Economics/Aktual'ni Problemi Ekonomìki. 145(7).

Hair J, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 1995. Multivariate data analysis. 4th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology. 51(6): 1173.

Qureshi, M. I., Rasli, A. M., Awan, U., Ma, J., Ali, G., Alam, A., & Zaman, K. 2014. Environment and air pollution: health services bequeath to grotesque menace. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 22(5): 3467-3476.

Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N. U., Rasli, A. M., & Zaman, K. 2015. The battle of health with environmental evils of Asian countries: promises to keep.Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 1-8.

Qureshi, M. I., Rasli, A. M., & Zaman, K. 2015. Energy crisis, greenhouse gas emissions and sectoral growth reforms: Repairing the fabricated mosaic. Journal of Cleaner Production

Downloads

Published

2015-12-11

How to Cite

MODELLING THE TRILOGY OF INNOVATION, LEARNING AND PERFORMANCE. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(22). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6665