INDOOR MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND ITS RELATION TO PHYSICAL INDOOR AIR QUALITY (IAQ) CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT LABORATORY CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Hazrin, A. H. Department of Biotechnology, Kulliyyah of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Anis Syazana, A. A. Department of Biotechnology, Kulliyyah of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Noor Faizul Hadry, N. Department of Biotechnology, Kulliyyah of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Norhidayah, A. Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, Gambang Campus, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Shukri, M. A. Department of Biotechnology, Kulliyyah of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan Campus, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6705

Keywords:

Indoor air quality (IAQ), laboratory, airborne pollutants, particulate matter (PM), microbes, CFU

Abstract

Laboratory usually refers to a room or building equipped with chemicals and biological agents for scientific experimentation and research. Due to its own indoor hazards and its cause of health implications, it is an urge to assess and to understand the physical indoor air quality (IAQ) characteristics in the laboratory and the variables affecting the degree of exposure to occupants. The main objectives of this study was aimed to assess and to compare the physical IAQ characteristics and airborne pollutants including particulate matters (PM) and gaseous pollutants between laboratories, to identify microbial contaminants via bacterial counts as well as scientific bacterial-kits species identification and to correlate the relationship of physical IAQ characteristics, airborne pollutants and microbial contaminants between different laboratory settings within the same building which are Natural Product (NP) laboratory, Plant Tissue Culture (PTC) laboratory, and Microbiology laboratory. The physical IAQ characteristics and airborne PM was measured using VelociCalc multi-function ventilation meter 9565 and DustMate environmental dust detector respectively. Surface Air System Indoor Air Quality (SAS IAQ) was used to capture the microbial contaminants and after that bacterial counting and identification were done. The scientific method protocol and standard reference limits were compared based on Industrial Code of Practice on Indoor Air Quality (ICOP) (2010) regulated by the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH). The temperature of PTC laboratory, velocity of NP laboratory and Microbiology laboratory, the respirable particulate matter (PM) of all three laboratories and Colony Forming Unit (CFU) count of PTC and NP laboratory exceeded the standard limit regulated by DOSH. This study demonstrated that Gemella morbillorum is the common bacterial species available in the environment with poor IAQ and there is a significant relationship between physical characteristics, airborne pollutants and microbial contaminants between the different types of laboratory settings. In conclusion, priority should be given to NP laboratory as it is exposed to poor IAQ conditions and immediate action should be taken to eliminate the problems.

References

Yau, Y. H., Chew, B. T., & Saifullah, A. Z. A. 2012. Studies on the Indoor Air Quality of Pharmaceutical Laboratories in Malaysia, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 1: 110-124.

Industrial Code of Practise on Indoor Air Quality. 2010. Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Malaysia.

Mui, K. W., Chan, W. Y., Wong, L. T. & Hui, P. S. 2007. Fungi–An Indoor Air Quality Assessment Parameter for Air-Conditioned Offices. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology. 28(3): 265-274.

Foster, R. W., & Robertson, C. S. 2001. Monitoring Indoor Air Quality in the Laboratory Building. Chemical Health and Safety. 8(3): 24-28.

Indoor Air Quality Management Group, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2003. Guidance Notes for the Management of Indoor Air Quality in Offices and Public Places. 1-110.

Memarzadeh, F. 2009. Effect of Reducing Ventilation Rate on Indoor Air Quality and Energy Cost in Laboratories. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety. 20-26.

Syazwan Aizat, I., Juliana, J., Norhafizalina, O., Azman, Z. A., & Kamaruzaman, J. 2009. Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome in Malaysian Buildings. Glob J Health Sci. 1(2): 126-136.

Menzies, D., Bourbeau, J., 1997. Building-related Illnesses. Journal of Medicine. 337(21): 1524-1531.

Mohd Nor Rawi, N. A., Jalaludin, J., & Chua, P. C. 2015. Indoor Air Quality and Respiratory Health among Malay Preschool Children in Selangor. BioMed Research Int. 2015.

Godish, Thad. 2000. Indoor Environmental Quality. Ventilation. Appleton and Lange. 333.

Heudorf, U., Neitzert V., & Spark, J. 2007. Particulate Matter and Carbon Dioxide in Classrooms–The Impact of Cleaning and Ventilation. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 212(1): 45-55.

Norhidayah, A., Chia-Kuang, Lee., Azhar, M. K. & Nurulwahida, S. 2013. Indoor Air Quality and Sick Building Syndrome in Three Selected Buildings. Procedia Engineering. 53: 93-98.

Valavanidis, A., & Vatista, M. 2006. Indoor Air Quality Measurements in the Chemistry Department Building of the University of Athens. Indoor and Built Environment. 15: 595-605.

Fromme, H., Twardella, D., Dietrich, S., Heitmann, D., Schierl, R., Liebl, B., & Rüden, H. 2007. Particulate Matter in the Indoor Air of Classrooms—Exploratory Results From Munich and Surrounding Area. Atmospheric Environment. 41(4): 854-866.

Blondeau, P., Lordache, V., Poupard, O., Genin, D. & Allard, F. 2005. The Relationship between Outdoor and Indoor Air Quality in Eight French Schools. Indoor Air. 15: 2-12.

Wheeler, A. J., Williams, I., Beaumont, R. A. & Hamilton, R. S. 2000. Characterisation of Particulate Matter Samples During a Study of Children’s Personal Exposure to Airborne Particulate Matter in a UK Urban Environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 65: 69-77.

Stranger, M., Potgieter-Vermaak, S. S., & Grieken, R. V. 2008. Characterization of Indoor Air Quality in Primary Schools in Antwerp, Belgium. Indoor Air. 18: 454-463.

Wang, L. K., Pereira, N. C., & Hung, Y. 2005. Advanced Air and Noise Pollution Control. Handbook of Environmental Engineering. 2: 1-511.

Grisoli, P., Rodolfi, M., Chiara, T., Zonta, L. A., & Dacarro, C. 2011. Evaluation of Microbial Air Quality and of Microclimate in University Classrooms. Environmental Monitoring Assessment. 184: 4171-4180.

Saravanan, N. P. 2004. Indoor Air Pollution: Danger at Home. Resonance. 6-11.

Taimur, S., Madiha, R., Samar, F., & Bushra, J. 2010. Gemella Morbillorum Endocarditis in a Patient with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Hellenic Journal of Cardiology. 51: 183-186.

Li, T. C., Ambu, S., Mohandas, K., Wah, M. J., Sulaiman, L. H., & Murgaiyah, M. 2014. Bacterial Constituents of Indoor Air in a High Throughput Building in the Tropics. Tropical biomedicine. 31(3): 540-556.

Cocolin, L., Rantsiou, K., Iacumin, L., Cantoni, C. & Comi, G. 2002. Direct Identification in Food Samples of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes by Molecular Methods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 68(12): 6273-6282.

Dworkin, M., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schelifer, K., & Stackebrandt, E. 2006. The Prokaryotes: Bacteria: Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria. 4: 278.

Bolotin, A., Wincker, P., Mauger, S., Jaillon, O., Malarme, K., Weissenbach, J., Dusko Ehrlich, S., & Sorokin, A. 2001. The Complete Genome Sequence of the Lactic Acid Bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis Il1403. Genome Research. 11(5): 731-753.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-13

How to Cite

INDOOR MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION AND ITS RELATION TO PHYSICAL INDOOR AIR QUALITY (IAQ) CHARACTERISTICS AT DIFFERENT LABORATORY CONDITIONS. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 77(24). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6705