COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CELL DISRUPTION METHODS AND CELL EXTRACTANT BUFFERS FOR RECOMBINANT BROMELAIN EXPRESSED IN E.COLI BL21-A1

Authors

  • Zatul Iffah Mohd Arshad Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300 Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Azura Amid Bioprocess and Molecular Engineering Research Unit, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, P.O. Box 10, 50728, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Muhd. Ezza Faiez Othman Bioprocess and Molecular Engineering Research Unit, Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, P.O. Box 10, 50728, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6712

Keywords:

Recombinant bromelain, cell disruption, sonication buffer

Abstract

The often-encountered problem such as protein degradation has driven various methods of cell lysis in obtaining recombinant protein post fermentation. In this paper, we compare methods such as homogenization, sonication, sonication with lysozyme and chemical lysis using B-PER reagent with lysozyme to extract the recombinant bromelain from E. coli BL21-AI. The sonication process is found to be the most effective in releasing recombinant bromelain without any pre-treatment. To obtain the high quality of protein from sonication method, the influence of different extractant buffer was investigated including phosphate buffer saline (PBS), PBS containing cysteine and EDTA (PBS-CE), and sodium phosphate buffer containing cysteine and EDTA (EB-CE). The highest specific enzyme activity was obtained when it was extracted with EB-CE buffer. Under sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the recombinant bromelain showed protein band at 55kDa. In conclusion, the sonication method with extractant buffer containing 100mM phosphate buffer pH7.0 with 15 mM cysteine and 2 mM EDTA (EB-CE) was shown to give high specific activity of recombinant bromelain.

References

Ketnawa, S., Chaiwut, P., Rawdkuen, S. 2012. Food Bioprod. Process. 90(3): 385-391.

Arshad, Z., Amid, A., Yusof, F., Jaswir, I., Ahmad, K., Loke, S., 2014. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1-15.

Amid, A., Ismail, N. A., Yusof, F., Salleh, H. M. 2011. Process Biochem. 46(12): 2232-2239.

George, S., Bhasker, S., Madhav, H., Nair, A., Chinnamma, M. 2014. Molecular Biotechnology. 56(2): 166-174.

Jung, Y.-J.C., C.-S., Park, J.-H., Kang, H.-W., Choi, J.-E., Nou, I.-S., Lee, S. Y. And Kang, K. K. 2008. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 11(1): 1-8.

Jamaluddin, M. J. A., Amid , A., Azmi, A. S., Othman, M. E. F. 2014. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 8(s.ed 1): 741-750.

Othman, M. E. F., Amid, A.a.J., Noraini, D., Jamaluddin, M. J. A. 2014. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 8 (s.ed 1).

Ho, C., Tan, W., Yap, W., Ling, T., Tey, B. 2008. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 13(5): 577-583.

Ramanan, R., Ling, T., Ariff, A. 2008. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 13(5): 613-623.

MOJSIN, M., NIKCEVIC, G., GRUJICIC, N. K., SAVIC, T. 2005. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society.

Middelberg, A. P. J. 1995. Biotechnology Advances. 13(3): 491-551.

Gräslund, S., Nordlund, P., Weigelt, J., Hallberg, B.M., Bray, J., Gileadi, O., Knapp, S., Oppermann, U., Arrowsmith, C., Hui, R., Ming, J., dhe-Paganon, S., Park, H.-w., Savchenko, A., Yee, A., Edwards, A., Vincentelli, R., Cambillau, C., Kim5, R., Kim5, S.-H., Rao, Z., Shi, Y., Terwilliger, T.C., Kim, C.-Y., Hung, L.-W., Waldo, G.S., Peleg, Y., Albeck, S., Unger, T., Dym9, O., Prilusky, J., Sussman, J.L., Stevens, R.C., Lesley, S.A., Wilson, I.A., Joachimiak, A., Collart, F., Dementieva, I., Donnelly, M.I., Eschenfeldt, W.H., Kim, Y., Stols, L., Wu, R., Zhou, M., Burley, S.K., Emtage, J.S., Sauder, J.M., Thompson, D., Bain, K., Luz, J., Gheyi, T., Zhang, F., Atwell, S., Almo, S.C., Bonanno, J.B., Fiser, A., Swaminathan, S., William, F., Studier, Chance, M.R., Sali, A., Acton, T.B., Xiao, R., Zhao, L., Ma, L.C., Hunt, J.F., Tong, L., Cunningham, K., Inouye, M., Anderson, S., Janjua, H., Shastry, R., Ho, C.K., Wang, D., Wang, H., Jiang, M., Montelione, G.T., Stuart, D.I., J, R., Owens, Daenke, S., Schütz, A., Heinemann, U., Yokoyama, S., Büssow, K., Gunsalus, K. C. 2008. Nat Meth. 5(2): 135-146.

Studier, F. W. 2005. Protein Expr Purif. 41(1): 207-234.

Marx, C. K., Hertel, T. C., Pietzsch, M. 2008. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 42(7): 568-575.

Lebendiker, D. M., 2002. 2012 (1 April).

VOSS, J. G. 1964. J. gen. Microbial. 35: 313-317.

Pierce, J. J., Turner, C., Keshavarz-Moore, E., Dunnill, P. 1997. Journal of Biotechnology. 58(1): 1-11.

n.d. 2012 (16 July).

Heinrickson, R. L., Kézdy, F. J. 1976. In: L. Laszlo (Ed.). Methods Enzymol. Academic Press. 740-751.

Bradford, M. M., 1976. Anal. Biochem. 72(1-2): 248-254.

Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Nature. 227(5259): 680-685.

Feliu, J. X., Cubarsi, R., Villaverde, A. 1998. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 58(5): 536-540.

Yuting Tian, Tianli Yue, Jinjin Pei, Yahong Yuan, Juhai Li, Martin Lo, Y. 2010. Food Science and Technology International. 16(2): 195-203.

Bystryak, S., Santockyte, R., Peshkovsky, A. S. 2015. Biochemical Engineering Journal. (0).

Chisti, Y., Moo-Young, M. 1986. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 8(4): 194-204.

Kalisz, H. M., Hendle, J., Schmid, R. D. 1997. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47: 502-507.

Bisswanger, H. 2014. Perspectives in Science. 1(1-6): 41-55.

Chaiwut, P., Nitsawang, S., Shank, L., Kanasawud, P. 2007. Chiang Mai J. Sci. 34(1): 109-118.

Ketnawa, S., Chaiwut, P., Rawdkuen, S. 2011. Food Science and Technology International. 17(4): 395-402.

Romero, I., Tellez, J., Yamanaka, L., Steindel, M., Romanha, A., Grisard, E., 2014. Parasites & Vectors. 7(1): 197.

Murachi, T., Neurath, H. 1960. J. Biol. Chem. 235(1): 99-107.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-13

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CELL DISRUPTION METHODS AND CELL EXTRACTANT BUFFERS FOR RECOMBINANT BROMELAIN EXPRESSED IN E.COLI BL21-A1. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 77(24). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6712