PID PARAMETERS OPTIMIZATION USING PSO TECHNIQUE FOR NONLINEAR ELECTRO HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR

Authors

  • Siti Marhainis Othman Department of Control and Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Fua’ad Rahmat Department of Control and Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Sahazati Md. Rozali Department of Control and Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Sazilah Salleh Department of Control and Mechatronic Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6793

Keywords:

Electrohydraulic Actuator, PID, PSO, Optimization, Nonlinear System

Abstract

Electro-hydraulic actuator (EHA) system inherently suffers from uncertainties, nonlinearities and time- varying in its model parameters which cause the modeling and controller designs are more complicated. Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control scheme has been proposed and the main problem with its application is to tune the parameters to its optimum values. This study will look into an optimization of PID parameters using particle swarm optimization (PSO). Simulation study has been done in Matlab and Simulink. 

References

R. Ghazali, Y. M. Sam and M. F. Rahmat. 2012. Simulation and Experimental Studies on Perfect Tracking Optimal Control of an Eledrohydraulic Actuator System. J. Control Sci. Eng. 1-8.

C. Kaddissi and J. Kenn. 2007. Identification and Real-Time Control of an Electrohydraulic Servo System Based on Nonlinear Backstepping. IEEE Trans. Mechatronics. 12(1): 12-22.

R. Adnan, M. Tajjudin and N. Ishak. 2011. Self-tuning Fuzzy PID Controller for Electro- Hydraulic Cylinder. IEEE 7th Int. Colloq. Signal Process. its Appl. Self-tuning. 395-398.

I. Ursu, F. Ursu and F. Popescu. 2006. Backstepping Design For Controlling Electrohydraulic Servos. J. Franklin Inst. 343(1): 94-110.

Z. Has, M. F. Rahmat, A. R. Husain, and K. Ishaque. 2013. Robust Position Tracking Control of an Electro-Hydraulic Actuator in the Presence of Friction and Internal Leakage. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39(4): 2965-2978.

M. A. A. A. N. K. Nasir, R. M. T. Raja Ismail. 2010. Performance Comparison Between Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and PD-PID Controllers for a Nonlinear Inverted Pendulum System. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol. 358-363

X. Ma, X. Song, and H. Li. 2010. Tuning of the PID Controller Based on Model Predictive Control. Chinese Control and Decision Conference.1091-1096

S. Md. Rozali. 2010. PID Controller Design for an Industrial Hydraulic Actuator with Servo System. IEEE Student Conf. Res. Dev. (SCOReD 2010). 13-14.

D. M. Wonohadidjojo and M. Y. Hassan. 2013. Position Control of Electro-Hydraulic Actuator System Using Fuzzy Logic Controller Optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 10(3): 181-193.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-16

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

PID PARAMETERS OPTIMIZATION USING PSO TECHNIQUE FOR NONLINEAR ELECTRO HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 77(28). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6793