MODERATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED BENEFIT BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL MANUFACTURING PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Hameed Adebambo School of Technology Management & Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok-Kedah, Malaysia
  • Hasbullah Ashari School of Technology Management & Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok-Kedah, Malaysia
  • Norani Nordin School of Technology Management & Logistics, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010 Sintok-Kedah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6898

Keywords:

Sustainable environmental manufacturing practices, firm performance, perceived benefits

Abstract

The need to maintain a balance between the developmental and environmental issues in manufacturing firms is required to ensure that the cost of environmental changes does not negate the economic benefits perceived by the firms. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of sustainable environmental manufacturing practices on firm performance via the moderating effect of perceived benefits. The study used a survey questionnaire which was posted to the operation, manufacturing manager and the environmental, health and safety manager to collect 103 data from the Malaysian manufacturing firms. The data collected was analyzed with smartPLS 2. M3. The study found that sustainable environmental manufacturing practices significantly influence environmental performance, while perceived benefits moderates between sustainable environmental manufacturing practices and operational performance. The study has revealed the understanding of the scenario of sustainable manufacturing practices in a developing country as yet to be considered as a strategic factor. Therefore, it is suggested that more awareness should be created to enlighten the manufacturing practitioners not only to perceive sustainable environmental practices as ethical, but also as a strategic factor to enhance achieving better firm performance.

References

Department of Environment. 2012. The National Policy On The Environment. Retrieved 12th October, 2012. www.doe.gov.my.

ESTS. 2012. Environmental Statistics Time Series Malaysia. ISSN 2289-2060.

Despeisse, M., Ball, P. D. & Evans, S. 2012. Modeling And Tactics For Sustainable Manufacturing: A Improvement Methodology. In G. Seliger (Ed.), Sustainable Manufacturing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27290-5_2.

The U.S. Department of Commerce. 2010. Sustainable Manufacturing Initiatives (SMI): A True Public–Private Dialogue. International Trade Administration.

Sidek, A. A. & Backhome, C. 2014. Environmental Sustainability Issues In Malaysian Metal Fabrication Smes: Comparative Analysis From A Case Study Perspectives. International Conference On Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bali. January 7 – 9. Indonesia.

Schoenherr, T. & Talluri, S. 2012. Environmental Sustainability Initiatives: A Comparative Analysis Of Plant Efficiencies In Europe And The U.S. Science. 35(1): 87-108.

Anis, F. M. & Nurul, F. H. 2012. The Development Of Sustainable Manufacturing Practices And Sustainable Performance In Malaysian Automotive Industry. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development. 3(7).

Choi, Y. & Zhang, N. 2011. Assessing The Sustainability Performance Of Chinese Industrial Sector. African Journal of Business Management. 5(13): 5261-5270,

Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. 2008. Why Do Patterns Of Environmental Response Differ? A Stakeholders' Pressure Approach. Strategic Management Journal. 29(11): 1225-1240

Christmann, P. 2000. Effects Of ‘‘Best Practices’’ Of Environmental Management On Cost Advantage: The Role Of Complementary Assets. Academy of Management Journal. 43: 663–680.

Hart, S. L. 1995. A Natural Resource-Based View Of The Firm. Academy Management Revision. 20(4): 986-1014.

Ameer, R. & Othma, R. 2011. Sustainability Practices And Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based On The Top Global Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics. doi 10.1007/s10551-011-1063.

Chen, M. K. & Shih, L. H. 2007. An Empirical Study Of Implementation Of Green Supply Chain Practices In The Electrical And Electronic Industry And Their Relation To Organizational Performances. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 4(3): 383-394.

Lopez-Gamero, M. D., Molina-Azorin, J. F. & Claver-Cortes, E. 2009. The Whole Relationship Between Environmental Variables And Firm Performance: Competitive Advantage And Firm Performance As Mediator Variables. Journal Of Environmental Management. 90(10): 3110-3121.

Lai, K. & Wong, C., W. Y. 2012. Green Logistics Management And Performance: Some Empirical Evidence From Chinese Manufacturing Exporters. Omega. 40: 267-282.

Zhu, Q. & Sarkis, J. 2004. Relationships Between Operational Practices And Performance Among Early Adopters Of Green Supply Chain Management Practices In Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises. International Journal Of Operations Management. 22: 265 – 289.

Garcia-Ayerbe, C., Riverra-Torres, P. & Murillo-Luna, J. L. 2012. Stakeholder Pressure And Environmental Proactivity: Moderating Effect Of Competitive Advantage Expectations. Management Decision. 50(2): 189-206.

Sharma, S., Pablo, A. L. & Vredenburg, H. 1999. Corporate Environmental Responsiveness Strategies: The Importance Of Issue Interpretation. The Journal of Applied Behavioural.

Sharma, S. 2000. Managerial Interpretations And Organizational Context As Predictors Of Corporate Choice Of Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Journal. 43(4): 681-97.

Morrow, D. & Roundinelli, D. 2002. Adopting Corporate Environmental Management System: Motivations And Results Of ISO 14001 And EMAS Certification. European Management Journal. 20(2): 159-171.

Beeton, S., Bergin-Seer, S. & Lee, C. 2007. Environmental Sustainable Practices Of Victorian Tourism Enterprises. National Library of Australian Cataloguing in Publication Data.

Al-Shourah, A. & Nasir Ibrahim, D. 2007. The Role Of Environmental Management Practices And Its Impact On Hotel Performance. The 3rd International Conference of the Asian Academy of Applied Business. 14-16 June 2007. Hadyai, Thailand.

Carter, T., Prasnikar, J. & Carter, B. 2009. Environmental Strategies And Their Motives And Results In Slovenian Business Practices. Economic and Business Review. 11(1): 55– 74.

Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. 2009. Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. 5th Ed. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. 2005. SmartPLS 2.0. www.smartpls.de.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. 2014. A Primer On Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks, Carlifornia.

Omar, R. & Samuel, R. 2011. Environmental Management Amongst Manufacturing Firms In Malaysia. Proceedings Of The 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition In Sustainable Energy And Environment. Melaka, Malaysia.

Molina-Azorin, J. F., Claver-Cotes, E., Lopez Gamero, M. D. & Tari, J. J. 2009. Green Management And Financial Performance: A Literature Review. Management Decision. 47(7): 1080-1100.

Jabbour, C. & Santos, F. 2006. The Evolution Of Environmental Management Within Organizations : Toward A Common Taxonomy. Environmental Quality Management. 16(2): 43-59.

Nishitani, K., Jannah, N., Ridwan, H. & Kaneko, S. 2013. The Influence Of Voluntary And Mandatory Environmental Performance On Financial Performance: Empirical Study Of Indonesian Firms. Kobe University. http://www.rieb.kobe.ac.jp/academic/ra/dEnglish/DP2013-01.pdf

Downloads

Published

2015-12-20

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

MODERATING ROLE OF PERCEIVED BENEFIT BETWEEN SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL MANUFACTURING PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(27). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6898