EVALUATION ON DISCOMFORT LEVEL AMONG STUDENTS USING DESKS IN CLASSROOMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6907Keywords:
Evaluate comfort level, Classroom desks, Polytechnic students.Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the discomfort level among students using desks in classrooms of Polytechnic Kuching. The students (n=500) completed the questionnaire survey form using Borg’s CR-10 Scale showing body chart discomfort. The students was asked to identify their body areas experiencing discomfort and to rate this discomfort on a score rating groups (0 to 5). Score 0-1.99 = No discomfort (1), score 2.00-3.99 = Discomfort (2) and score 4.00-5.00 = Very uncomfortable (3). The evaluation of the seating shows discomfort level of students and any outstanding problems arising. Students were asked to rank in the order of 10 statements about comfort and choose three responses which gave the most consistent equal interval scale. The results in that the main response of discomfort indicated the students mostly agree that they are feeling from cramped, stiff, numb, sore and tender to unbearable pain, barely comfortable and feel uncomfortable. The project was identified to evaluate the comfort level of classrooms desks for polytechnic students. Overall, there was a significant discomfort level for the students whilst using the desks and a possible solution put forward is to design a new type of classroom desk made of natural fibre reinforced composite.
References
Thariq M.G., Munasinghe H.P. and Abeysekara J.D., 2010. Designing chairs with mounted desktop for university students: Ergonomics and comfort. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40, 8-18.
Panagiotopoulou G., Christoulas K., Papanckolaou A. and Mandroukas K., 2004. Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school. Journal of Applied Ergonomics 35, 121-128.
Castellucci H.I., Arezes P.M. and Molenbroek., 2014. Analysis of the most relevant anthropometric dimensions for school furniture selection based on a study with students from one Chilean region. Journal of Applied Ergonomics 46, 201-211.
Mokdad M. and Al-Ansari M., 2009. Anthropometrics for the design of Bahraini school furniture. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39, 728-735.
Dianat I., Karimi M.A., Hashemi A.A. and Bahrampour S., 2012. Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristic of Iranian high school student: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Journal of Applied Ergonomics 44, 101-108.
Agha S.R. and Alnahhal M.J., 2012. Neural network and multiple linear regression to predict school children dimensions for ergonomic school furniture design. Journal of Applied Ergonomics, 43, 979-984.
Karmegam K., Ismail M.Y., Sapuan S.M., Shamsul Bahri M.T., Shuib S. and Seetha P., 2009. A study on motorcyclist’s riding discomfort in Malaysia. Engineering e-Transaction 4, 39-46.
Jung H.S., 2005. A prototype of an adjustable and an adjustable chair for schools. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35, 955-969.
Anandasivam K. and Cheong F.C., 2008. Designing a creative learning environment: NTU’s New Art, Design & Media Library. The Electronic Library Oxford, vol. 26, page 650.
Oyewole S.A., Haight J.M. and Frevalds A., 2010. The ergonomic design of classroom furniture/computer work station for first graders in the elementary school. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 40, 437-447.
Taghiyari H.R., Bari E., Schmidt O., Ghanbary M.A.T., Karimi A. and Paridah MD.T., 2014. Effect of nanowollastonite on biological resistance of particleboard made from wood chips and chicken feather against Antrodia vaillantii. International Biodeterioration & biodegradation 90, 93-98.
Rozman H.D., Tay G.S., Kumar R.N., Abubakar A., Ismail H. and Mohd Ishak Z.A., 1999. Polypropylene hybrid composites: a preliminary study on the use of glass and coconut fiber as reinforcements in polypropylene composites. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering 38, 997-1011.
Mishra S., Tripathy S.S., Misra M., Mohanty A.K. and Nayak S.K., 2002. Novel eco-friendly biocomposites:biofibre reinforced biodegradable polyester amide composites-fabrication and properties evaluation. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 21, 55-70.
Krejcie R.V. and Morgan D.W., 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement 30, 607-610.
Goonetilleke R.S. and Feizhou S., 2001. A methodology to determine the optimum seat depth. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27, 207-217.
Kuorinka I., Jonsson B., Kilbom A., Vinterberg H., Biering-Sorensen F., Andersson G. and Jorgensen K., 1987. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Applied Ergonomics 18, 233-237.
Lusted M., Healey S. and Mandryk J.A., 1994. Evaluation of the seating of Qantas flight deck crew. Applied Ergonomics 25, 275-282.
Jabatan Hal Ehwal Pelajar Politeknik Kuching Sarawak, 2014. Laporan Pendaftaran Pelajar Sesi Jun 2014, (Pengambilan & Data).
Perreault N., Brisson C., Dionne C., Montreuil S. and Punnett L., 2008. Agreement between a self-administered questionnaire on musculoskeletal disorders of the neck-shoulder region and a physical examination. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 9, 34
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
