LASER TATTOO REMOVAL COMPARISON BETWEEN 1064 AND 532 NM OF A Q-SWITCHEd Nd:YAG LASER TREATMENT

Authors

  • Nada Abusalah Almabrouk Imrigha Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor, Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Lau Pik Suan Laser Centre, IBNU-SINA Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor, Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Shumaila Islam Laser Centre, IBNU-SINA Institute for Scientific and Industrial Research, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor, Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Ganesan Krishnan Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor, Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Noriah Bidin Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor, Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.7499

Keywords:

Q-switched Nd, YAG laser, Tattoo removal, Sprague Dawley rats, Interaction of laser with rats’ skins

Abstract

Invention of the Q-switch advanced laser method is the most effective methods of tattoo removal compared to other methods of i.e. chemical, mechanical and surgical. In this study, we are reporting black pigment tattoo removal by comparing two wavelengths 532 nm and 1064 nm of Q-switched Nd-YAG laser. Using a single-pulse laser at 1064 nm wavelength, the maximum laser fluence for skin damage is 3.04 J/cm2 with pulse energy 0.55 J. While, at 532 nm wavelength, maximum laser fluence is 0.5 J/cm2 with pulse energy 0.42 J at 8-10 ns for tattooed skins. Moreover, after 1064 nm and 532 nm laser irradiations, skin biopsy of black tattooed rat’s skin demonstrates the ink granules local redistribution. Microscopic study indicates that black ink particles become smaller and vanished from the skins after 1064 nm laser treatment. The findings of this study indicate that 1064 nm wavelengths of Q-switched Nd-YAG laser treatment with 0.55 J pulse energy, is one of the significant methods of black tattoo removal with remarkable differences.

References

Goldstein, N. 2007. Tattoos Defined. Clinics in Dermatology. 25(4): 417-420.

Corrente, S., Moschese, V., Chianca, M., Graziani, S., Iannini, R., Rocca, M., and Chini, L. 2007. Temporary Henna Tattoo in Unsafe in Atopic Children. Acta Paediatrica. 96(3): 469-471.

DeSilva, D., and Seah, A. 2007. A “Tattoo†of Erythema Multiforme. Annals of the Academy of Medicine. Singapore. 36(3): 226.

Bazan, L. E., Harris, L. and Lorentzen, L. A. 2002. Migrant Gangs, Religion and Tattoo Removal. Peace Review. 14(4): 379-383.

Reed, C. E. 2000. Tattoo in Early China. Journal Of The American Oriental Society. 120(3): 360-376.

Thomas, N., Cole, A., and Douglas, B. 2005. Tattoo: Bodies, Art and Exchange in the Pacific and the West. Reaktion Books.

Koch, J. R., Roberts, A. E., Armstrong, M. L., and Owen, D. C. 2004. Correlations of Religious Belief and Practice with College Students “Tattoo-Related Behaviorâ€. Psychological Reports. 94: 425-430.

Clabaugh, A. W. 1975. Tattoo Removal by Superfical Dermabrasion: Five-Years Experience. Plast Reconster Surg. 55: 401-405.

Fitzpatrick, E. R., Whitney, D. T., Goldman, P. M. and Satur, M. N. 1996. Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser, Trichloroacetic Acid, Baker-Gordon Phenol, and Dermabrasion: A Comparative Clinical and Histologic Study of Cutaneous Resurfacing in a Porcine Model. 132(4): 469-471.

Kossida, T., Rigopoulos, D., Katsambas, A. and Anderson, R. R. 2011. Optimal Tattoo Removal in A Single Laser Session Based On The Method Of Repeated Exposures. American Journal. 66(2): 271-277.

Lau, P. S., Bidin, N., Krishnan, G., Anaybbaleg, S. M., Marsin, F. M., Sum, M. B., Baktiar, H., Nassir, H. Z., Chong, P. L. and Hamid, A. 2015. Wound Treatment on a Diabetic Rat Model byA808 nm Diode Laser. Laser Physics. 25(7): 075601.

Beade, M. K., Levine, J. V. and Ashinoff, R. 2001. Laser Removal of Tattoos. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2(1): 21-25.

Bernstein, F. E. 2015. A Widespread Allergic Reaction to Black Tattoo Ink Caused by Laser Treatment. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 47(2): 180-182.

Ohshiro, T. 2015. History of the World Federation of Societies for Laser Medicine and Surgery (WFSLMS) and Its Non-Profit Organization (NPO-WFSLMS). Laser Ther. 24(1): 9-14.

Irkoren, S., Demirdover, C., Akad, B. Z. and Gorgu, M. 2011. The Q-Switched Nd: YAG Laser in Tattoo Removal and the Effect of Lymphatic Elimination: An Experimental Study in Rabbits. Surgical Science. 2: 262-268.

Hassan, S., Hamoudi, W., Ibrahim, T. and Haroun, R. 2014. Non-Ablative Tattoo Removal Using Fundamental and Second Harmonic Nd:YAG laser (Tattoo Ink Clearance Response). Iraqi Journal of Applied Physics. 10: 21-26.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-21

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

LASER TATTOO REMOVAL COMPARISON BETWEEN 1064 AND 532 NM OF A Q-SWITCHEd Nd:YAG LASER TREATMENT. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 78(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.7499