PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF FOUR-STROKE SI (SPARK IGNITION) ENGINE USING ETHANOL-GASOLINE BLEND E50 AT VARIABLE LOAD AND COMPRESSION RATIO

Authors

  • M. A. Khattak Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Anique Mukhtar Faculty of Engineering & Technology, HITEC University, Taxila Pakistan
  • M. W. Anjum Faculty of Engineering & Technology, HITEC University, Taxila Pakistan
  • S. Kamran Afaq Faculty of Engineering & Technology, HITEC University, Taxila Pakistan
  • Muhammad Abdul Ahad Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute, Swabi Pakistan
  • Mahmood Khan Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Space Technology, 44000 Islamabad, Pakistan
  • S. Kazi Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Islamic University Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
  • Saeed Badshah Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Rafiuallah Khan Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.7825

Keywords:

Internal combustion engine, ethanol-gasoline blends, engine performance, alternative Fuel, ethanol as fuel

Abstract

Due to combination of factors, such as environmental concerns, high oil prices and the potential for peak oil, development of cleaner alternative fuels and advanced power systems for vehicles has become a high priority for many governments and vehicle manufacturers around the world. Use of Gasoline as an alternative fuel in Gasoline engine is becoming a need, looking at the scarcity of petroleum fuels in near future. This paper investigates the influence of compression ratio and ethanol-gasoline blending to find the effects on four-stroke SI engine performance. In this research, air cooled engine having compression ratio of 9.1 & 9.7 is used. Fuel blend E50 is used in the study and engine operated at a speed range of 600-1100 rpm. Maximum power was obtained for E50 fuel at a compression ratio of 9.1, while, a minimum fuel consumption rate was obtained at a compression ratio of 9.7. This clearly depicts that as compression ratio increases, fuel consumption rate decreases considerably. Further, experimental results showed that comparing several blends, 50% ethanol is cost and power effective for the four-stroke SI engine. 

Author Biography

  • M. A. Khattak, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

    Dr. Muhammad Adil Khattak
    (PhD,ME,MBA,BE)

    Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
    Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
    81310 UTM Skudai, Johor, MALAYSIA

    Mobile +6017 8272871 / Office +607 5534 856 / Fax +607 5566 159

References

L. R. Lynd. 1996. Overview And Evaluation Of Fuel Ethanol From Cellulosic Biomass: Technology, Economics, The Environment, And Policy. Annual Review of Energy and The Environment. 21(1): 403-465.

S. Prasad, A. Singh, N. Jain, and H. Joshi. 2007. Ethanol Production From Sweet Sorghum Syrup For Utilization As Automotive Fuel In India. Energy & Fuels. 21(1): 2415-2420.

H. L. Wakeley, C. T. Hendrickson, W. M. Griffin, and H. S. Matthews. 2009. Environmental Science & Technology. 43: 2228-2233.

M. Balat, and H. Balat. 2009. Recent Trends In Global Production And Utilization Of Bio-Ethanol Fuel. Applied Energy. 86: 2273-2282.

J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, and C. Johnson. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis.

Y. Lin, and S. Tanaka. 2006. Ethanol Fermentation From Biomass Resources: Current State And Prospects. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 69(1): 627-642.

D.S. Hirshfeld, J.A. Kolb, J.E. Anderson, W. Studzinski, and J. Frusti . 2014 . Refining economics of US Gasoline: octane ratings and ethanol, Environmental Science & Technology. 48(1): 11064-11071.

U. Rashid, F. Anwar, T.M. Ansari, M. Arif, and M. Ahmad . 2009 . Optimization of alkaline transesterification of rice bran oil for biodiesel production using response surface methodology, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology. 84(1): 1364-1370.

A.J. Liska, H.S. Yang, V.R. Bremer, T.J. Klopfenstein, D.T. Walters, G.E. Erickson, and K.G. Cassman . 2009 . Journal of Industrial Ecology. 13(1): 58-74.

D.D. Hsu, D. Inman, G.A. Heath, E.J. Wolfrum, M.K. Mann, and A. Aden . 2010 . Improvements in life cycle energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions of cornâ€ethanol, Environmental Science & Technology. 44(1): 5289-5297.

M. Brusstar, M. Stuhldreher, D. Swain, and W. Pidgeon . 2002 . High efficiency and low emissions from a port-injected engine with neat alcohol fuels, SAE paper : 2743.

M. Pehnt . 2006 . Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies, Renewable Energy. 31(1): 55-71.

H. Von Blottnitz, and M.A. Curran . 2007 . A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective, Journal of cleaner production. 15(1): 607-619.

M. Velliangiri, and A. Krishnan . 2012 . An Experimental Investigation of Performance and Emission in Ethanol Fuelled Direct Injection Internal Combustion Engines with Zirconia Coating, Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy. 2(1): 42-53.

C.P. Hubbard, J.E. Anderson, and T.J. Wallington . 2013 . Ethanol and air quality: Influence of fuel ethanol content on emissions and fuel economy of flexible fuel vehicles, Environmental Science & Technology. 48(1): 861-867.

W.-D. Hsieh, R.-H. Chen, T.-L. Wu, and T.H. Lin . 2002 . Engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol–gasoline blended fuels, Atmospheric Environment. 36(1): 403-410.

M. Al-Hasan . 2003 . Effect of ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emission, Energy Conversion and Management. 44(1): 1547-1561.

C. Sayin, M. Ilhan, M. Canakci, and M. Gumus . 2009 . Effect of injection timing on the exhaust emissions of a diesel engine using diesel–methanol blends, Renewable Energy. 34(1):1261-1269.

C. Sayin . 2010 . Engine performance and exhaust gas emissions of methanol and ethanol–diesel blends,Fuel. 89(1): 3410-3415.

F.T. Ansari, A.P. Verma, and A. Chaube . 2013 . Effect on Performance and Emissions of SI Engine Using Ethanol as Blend Fuel Under Varying Compression Ratio, International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, ESRSA Publications.

K. Owen and T. Coley. 1995 . Automotive fuels reference book.

J. Rakoczy, R. Mirek, and A. Pyszowski.2006.Effect of ethanol fuel on natural environment in urban areas, Environment Protection Engineering. 32(1):169-174.

P.V. Vardhan. Analysis of Working Pressure on The Performance of IC Engines.

R. Magnusson, C. Nilsson, and B. Andersson.2002. Emissions of aldehydes and ketones from a two-stroke engine using ethanol and ethanol-blended gasoline as fuel, Environmental Science & Technology. 36(1): 1656-1664.

R.M. Bata, A.C. Elrod, and R.W. Rice . 1989 . Emissions from IC engines fueled with alcohol–gasoline blends: a literature review, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 111(1): 424-431.

C.-A. NILSSON, R. LINDAHL, and Å. Norström . 1987 . Occupational exposure to chain saw exhausts in logging operations, The American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 48(1): 99-105.

S. Wang, and D. Yu . 2008 . Adaptive RBF network for parameter estimation and stable air–fuel ratio control, Neural Networks. 21(1): 102-112.

T. AINA . 2012 . Influence of Compression Ratio on The Performance Characteristics of A Spark Ignition Engine.

C.R. Ferguson.1985. Internal Combustion Engines: Applied Thermosciences.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-29

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF FOUR-STROKE SI (SPARK IGNITION) ENGINE USING ETHANOL-GASOLINE BLEND E50 AT VARIABLE LOAD AND COMPRESSION RATIO. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 79(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.7825