FACTORS INFLUENCES RESIDENTIAL LOCATION SELECTION PREFERENCES TOWARD FUTURE NEIGHBORHOOD

Authors

  • Gobi Krishna Sinniah Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Zaly Shah Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Geoff Vigar Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.7993

Keywords:

Residential location preferences, travel behavior, structural equation modeling

Abstract

It is critical to study the travel behaviour of residents as it provides an understanding on what people do over space and how people use transportation within that space. The objective of this study is to identify the factors that determine residential location preferences towards future neighborhood selection. Current literature focuses on preferences in relation to physical and demographic aspects, such as ownership, income, land use, facilities as well as transportation services. However, this study suggests safety and cultural aspects which are likely to be significant in many contexts. In order to further investigate these suggestions, a case study has been carried out based on Iskandar Malaysia’s development region. A Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is applied to 384 household heads on their housing selection preferences. The result shows that there are significant relationships between residential location preferences and travel behaviour.

References

Ho, C.S., Simson, J., Matsuoka, Y., and Gomi, K. 2012. Low Carbon Urban Development Strategy In Malaysia – The Case Of Iskandar Malaysia Development Corridor. Habitat International, 1-9. Iskandar Malaysia Blueprint Report.

Scheiner, J. 2006. Housing Mobility and Travel Behaviour. A Process-Oriented Approach to Spatial Mobility: Evidence from A New Research Field In Germany. Journal of Transport Geography. 14: 287-298.

Kitamura, R., Moktharian, P.L. and Laidet, L. 1997. A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation. 24(2): 125-158.

Sinniah, G. K., Zaly Shah, M., Vigar, G., Aditjandra, P.T. 2014. Residential Location Preferences: The Significance Of Socio-Cultural And Religious Attributes. TeMA 2: 223-238.

Susilo, Y. O. and Waygood, E. O. D. 2012. A Long Term Analysis Of The Mechanisms Underlying Children’s Activity-Travel Engagements In The Osaka Metropolitan Area. Journal of Transport Geography. 20:41-50.

Aditjandra, P.T., Cao, X.J., and Mulley, C. 2012. Understanding Neighbourhood Design Impact On Travel Behavior: An Application Of Structural Equations Model To A British Metropolitan Data. Transportation Research Part A. 46: 22-32.

Silva, J. 2014. Spatial Self-Selection in Land-Use-Travel Behaviour Interactions: Accounting Simultaneously for Attitudes and Socioeconomic Characteristics. The Journal of Transport and Land Use. 7(2):63-84.

Mokhtarian, P.L., and Cao, X. 2008. Examining The Impacts Of Residential Self-Selection On Travel Behavior: A Focus On Methodologies. Transportation Research Part B. 42: 204-228.

Golob, T. 2003. Structural Equation Modelling For Travel Behavior Research. Transportation Research Part B. 37: 1-25.

Bangley, M.N., and Moktharian, P. 2002. The Impact of Residential Neighborhood Type on Travel Behaviour: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. Annals of Regional Science. 36: 279-297.

Scheiner, J. 2010. Social Inequalities In Travel Behavior: Trip Distances In The Context Of Residential Self-Selection And Lifestyles. Journal of Transport Geography. 18: 679-690.

Henser, D.A. 2001. Measurement Of The Valuation Of Travel Time Savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 35(Part 1):71-98.

Susilo, Y.O. Williams, K., Lindsay, M., and Dair, C. 2012. The Influence Of Individuals’ Environmental Attitudes And Urban Design Features On Their Travel Patterns In Sustainable Neighborhoods In The UK. Transportation Research Part D. 17: 190-200.

Cram, J.A. 2005. Sustainable Suburbs: Neighborhood Characteristics and Travel Behaviour. Phd Thesis. School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Curtis, C. and Perkins, T. 2006. Travel Behavior: A Review Of Recent Literature. Working Paper No.3, Urban Net.

Aditjandra, P.T. 2008. The Relationship Between Urban Form And Travel Behaviour: A Micro-Analysis In Tyne And Wear. PhD Thesis. School of Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, United Kingdom.

Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., and Handy, S.L. 2007. Do Changes In Neighborhood Characteristics Lead To Changes In Travel Behavior A Structural Equations Modelling Approach. Transportation. 34(5): 535-556.

Boarnet, M.G. and Crane, R. 2001. The Influences Of Land Use On Travel Behavior: Empirical Strategies. Transportation Research Part A. 35 (9): 823-845.

Cervero, R. 2002. Built Environments And Mode Choice: Towardaa Normative Framework. Transportation Research Part D. 7: 265-284.

Srinivasan, S., and Rogers, P. 2005. Travel Behavior Of Low-Income Residents: Studying Two Contrasting Locations In The City of Chennai, India. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(3): 265-274.

Lles, R. 2005. Public Transport in Developing Countries. Bingley, UK. Emerald Publishing.

Newbold, J.D., Scott, D.M., Spinney, J.E.L., Kanaroglou, P. and Paex, A. 2005. Do Canada’s Older Population Have Different Travel Patters Compared with Younger Canadians. Journal of Transport Geography. 13: 340-351.

Burbridge, S.K. and Goulias, K.G. 2008. Active Travel Behaviour. 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. January. 11-15.

Handy, S., Cao, X. and Mokhtarian, P., 2005. Correlation Or Causality Between The Built Environment And Travel Behavior; Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research. Part D, 10: 427–444.

Abrahamse, W., Steg, l., Gifford, R, and Vlek, C. 2009. Factors Influencing Car Use For Commuting And The Intention To Reduce It: A Question Of Self-Interest Or Morality. Transport Research. Part F. 12: 317-324

Elias, W. and Shiftan, Y. 2013. The Influence of Individual’s Risk Perception and Attitudes on Travel Behaviour. Transportation Research. Part A. 46: 1241-1251.

Choi, Y.M. 2013. A Structural Equation Modelling of The Determinants of Repeats Purchase Behavioural of online grocery shoppers in the UK. PhD Thesis. Newcastle University Business School, UK.

Van Acker, V., Witlox, F., and Wee, B.V. 2007. The Effects Of The Land Use System On Travel Behavior: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Transportation Planning and Technology. 30(4): 331-353

Downloads

Published

2016-03-28

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

FACTORS INFLUENCES RESIDENTIAL LOCATION SELECTION PREFERENCES TOWARD FUTURE NEIGHBORHOOD. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.7993