MALAYSIAN WATER UTILITIES PERFORMANCE WITH THE PRESENCE OF UNDESIRABLE OUTPUT: A DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH

Authors

  • Norbaizura Kamarudin Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Wan Rosmanira Ismail School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Noor Asiah Ramli Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8232

Keywords:

DEA model, DDF model, NRW, undesirable outputs

Abstract

Non-Revenue Water (NRW) is water losses in the distribution process and it affects water supply management worldwide. Malaysia is not excluded and the authority has put a high priority on NRW as it affects the revenue collection. Consequently, NRW is established as one of the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to assess the efficiency of Malaysia water supply industry. However, the current policy is impractical; the assessment of all the water utilities is against a single NRW target. Moreover, NRW should be considered as an undesirable product in the water supply system. Therefore, an alternative to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)-based approach called Directional Distance Function (DDF) is applied to measure the performance of the integrated production of desirable and undesirable outputs. The result shows that the measurement of water technical efficiency is more explicit using DDF model, where the potential reduced level of NRW for each inefficient water utility can be determined in order to improve their performance. This is in line with the government’s aim to reduce the NRW level countrywide. 

References

Mohammad Salleh, H. 2000. Evaluation of Non-Revenue Water and Leakage in Public and Private Water Supply Systems. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.

Liemberger, R. 2002. Do You Know How Misleading the Use of Wrong Performance Indicators Can Be. IWA Specialised Conference, Leakage Management- A Practical Approach. Cyprus, November 2002.

Lee, Y.H., and C., Lee. 2009. Efficiency in the Malaysian Water Industry: A DEA and Regression Analysis. 17th Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24-27 June 2009.

Munisamy, S. 2009. Efficiency and Ownership in Water Supply: Evidence from Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers. 5(6): 148-260.

Chung, Y. H., R., Färe, and S., Grosskopf. 1997. Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach. Journal of Environmental Management. 51(3): 229-240.

Charnes, A., W. W., Cooper, and E., Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2(6): 429-444.

Farrell, M. J. 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General). 120(3): 253-290.

Byrnes, P., S., Grosskopf, and K., Hayes. 1986. Efficiency and Ownership: Further Evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics. 68(2): 337-341.

Lambert, D. K., D., Dichev, and K., Raffiee. 1993. Ownership and Sources of Inefficiency in the Provision of Water Services. Water Resources Research. 29(6): 1573-1578.

Thanassoulis, E. 2000. The Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in the Regulation of UK Water Utilities: Water Distribution. European Journal of Operational Research. 126(2): 436-453.

Anwandter, L., and Jr, T., Ozuna. 2002. Can Public Sector Reforms Improve the Efficiency of Public Water Utilities?. Environment and Development Economics. 7(4): 687-700.

Cubbin, J. 2005. Efficiency in the Water Industry. Utilities Policy. 13(4): 289-293.

Garcia-Sanchez, I. 2006. Efficiency Measurement in Spanish Local Government: The Case of Municipal Water Services. Review of Policy Research. 23(2): 355-371.

lo Storto, C. 2013. Evaluating Technical Efficiency of Italian Major Municipalities: A Data Envelopment Analysis Model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 81(2013): 346-350.

Romano, G., and A., Guerrini. 2011. Measuring and Comparing the Efficiency of Water Utility Companies: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Utilities Policy. 19(3): 202-209.

Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., F. J., Sáez-Fernández, and F., González- Gómez. 2008. Does Service Quality Matter in Measuring the Performance of Water Utilities?. Utilities Policy. 16(1): 30-38.

Mandal, S. K., and S., Madheswaran. 2010. Environmental Efficiency of the Indian Cement Industry: An Interstate Analysis. Energy Policy. 38(2): 1108-1118.

Riccardi, R., G., Oggioni, and R., Toninelli. 2012. Efficiency Analysis of World Cement Industry in Presence of Undesirable Output: Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Directional Distance Function. Energy Policy. 44(2012): 140-152.

Ramli, N. A., and Munisamy, S. 2013. A Study on Eco-Efficiency of the Manufacturing Sector in Malaysia. Actual Problems of Economics. 12(2013): 480-491.

Seiford, L. M., and J., Zhu. 2002. Modeling Undesirable Factors in Efficiency Evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research. 142(1): 16-20.

Malaysian Water Association. 2010. Malaysia Water Industry Guide 2010. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Water Association.

Malaysian Water Association. 2011. Malaysia Water Industry Guide 2011. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Water Association.

Malaysian Water Association. 2012. Malaysia Water Industry Guide 2012. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Water Association.

Malaysian Water Association. 2013. Malaysia Water Industry Guide 2013. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Water Association.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-18

How to Cite

MALAYSIAN WATER UTILITIES PERFORMANCE WITH THE PRESENCE OF UNDESIRABLE OUTPUT: A DIRECTIONAL DISTANCE FUNCTION APPROACH. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(4-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8232