EFFECT OF TERRAIN SIZE AND PAUSE TIME ON THE PERFORMANCE OF REACTIVE ROUTING PROTOCOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8258Keywords:
Mobile ad hoc network, reactive protocols, proactive protocols, AODV, DSR.Abstract
A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) is a group of mobile wireless nodes without pre established infrastructure or central management with frequent changing topology. In the last few years, various routing protocols are targeted specially at MANET have been proposed however little data is available about the effect of various parameters on the performance of these protocols. In this paper, we assess the impact of several terrain areas and pause times on the performance of the two prominent reactive routing protocols; i.e. AODV and DSR and present the results of our simulations. It is observed that the hop-by-hop AODV perform much better for medium size terrain areas while DSR is suitable for small terrain areas. For larger terrain areas, the average end-to-end delay encountered by AODV is very low compared to DSR.
References
Chlamtac, I., Conti, M., & Liu, J. J. N. 2003. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Imperatives And Challenges. Ad Hoc Networks. 1(1): 13-64.
Belding-Royer, E. M. 2004. Routing Approaches In Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking. 1(1): 275-300.
Malkin, G. S., & Steenstrup, M. E. 1995. Distance-Vector Routing. In Routing In Communications Networks. 83-98.
Moy, J. 1995. Link-State Routing. In Routing In Communications Networks.135-157.
Royer, E. M., and Toh, C. K. 1999. A Review Of Current Routing Protocols For Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks. Personal Communications, IEEE. 6(2): 46-55.
Perkins, C. E., and Bhagwat, P. 1994. Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) For Mobile Computers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 24(4): 234-244
Clausen, T., Jacquet, P., Adjih, C., Laouiti, A., Minet, P., Muhlethaler, P., and Viennot, L. 2003. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR).
Bellur, B., Ogier, R. G., and Templin, F. L. 2001. Topology Broadcast Based On Reverse-Path Forwarding (TBRPF). draft-ietf-manet-tbrpf-02. txt.
Abbas, S. 2011. A Layered Security Approach For Cooperation Enforcement In MANETs (Doctoral dissertation, Liverpool John Moores University).
Johnson, D. B., and Maltz, D. A. 1996. Dynamic Source Routing In Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. Mobile Computing. 153-181.
Perkins, C. E., and Royer, E. M. 2001. The Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance-Vector Protocol. Ad Hoc Networking. 173-219.
Alshowkan, M., Fattah, E. A., and Odeh, A. 2012. Performance Evaluation of DYMO, AODV and DSR Routing Protocols in MANET. Performance Evaluation. 49(11).
Tuteja, A., Gujral, R., and Thalia, S. 2010. Comparative performance analysis of DSDV, AODV and DSR routing protocols in MANET using NS2. In Advances in Computer Engineering (ACE), 2010 International Conference. Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 20-21 June 2010. 330-333.
Broch, J., Maltz, D. A., Johnson, D. B., Hu, Y. C., and Jetcheva, J. 1998. A Performance Comparison Of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE International Conference On Mobile Computing And Networking. 85-97). ACM.
Sagar, S., Saqib, J., Bibi, A., and Javaid, N. 2011. Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of DYMO and OLSR in MANETs and in VANETs. In Multitopic Conference (INMIC), 2011 IEEE 14th International. Karachi, Pakistan. 22-24 December 2011. 362-366.
Issariyakul, T. and, E. Hossain 2011. Introduction to network simulator NS2. Springer Science & Business Media
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
