IMPACT OF DISASTER TO PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION OGRANISATIONS IN MALAYSIA

Authors

  • Iffah Farhana Abu Talib Centre of Postgraduate Studies, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia
  • Roshana Takim Centre of Postgraduate Studies, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Hadi Nawawi Centre of Postgraduate Studies, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia
  • Padzil @ Fadzil Hassan Centre of Postgraduate Studies, Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, University Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8497

Keywords:

Disaster impacts key areas, Malaysia, Private construction organisations, Vulnerable factors

Abstract

Disaster events tend to affect construction organisations in the entire community. In the recent years, with the intensity and frequency of disaster occurrences in Malaysia, the impact of disaster could destruct construction organisational business, assets and properties. For instance, flood occurrence in 2011, has affected the double track construction project in Malaysia resulting time overrun for a period of 18 months and financial loss of ringgit Malaysia 150 million to private construction organisations. Based on the 11th Malaysian Plan (Strategy Paper 11: Climate Resilient Development), construction organisations are recommended to identify the disaster impacts to prepare for disaster occurrences. Hence, the objective are: to investigate vulnerable factors of disaster (pre-event) and to distinguish the key areas of disaster impacts (post-event) for private construction organisations in Malaysia. The initial research starts with literature review from various scholars on key areas of disaster impact and disaster impact model. The next stage is conducting preliminary data survey among seven private construction organisations involved in disasters. The findings revealed that in Malaysia, social and environmental vulnerabilities are prominent elements in the pre-event phase of disaster impact. Subsequently, the Malaysian private construction organisations selected four (4) key areas of disaster impact to be the utmost critical at the post-event phase. These are people: reputation; information and communication; and finance. The outcomes of the research would provide valuable insight to the private construction organisations in Malaysia in reducing impacts to any kind of disaster and to sustain the business efficacy in the long run.

References

EM-DAT. The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. 2015. [Online]. Accessed: 24-Jun-2015. Available: http://www.emdat.be/.

World Health Organisation. 2007. Risk Reduction and Emergency Peparedness. WHO Doc. Prod. Serv. Geneva, Switz. 20.

Ahayalimudin, N., Ismail, A., and Saiboon, I. 2012. Disaster Management: A Study on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Emergency Nurse & Community Health Nurse. BMC Public Health. 12.

National Audit Department. 2011. Auditor General’s Report.

Abdul-Jalil, S. 2003. Raising Business Continuity Management Awareness in Malaysia. Bus. Contin. Manag. 1-8.

Wedawatta, G., Ingirige, M., Jones, K. and Proverbs, D. 2011. Extreme Weather Events And Construction Smes: Vulnerability, Impacts And Responses.

L. Pearson. 2012. Early Warning of Disasters: Facts and Figures.

Wedawatta, G. and Ingirige, M. 2012. Resilience And Adaptation Of Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises To Flood Risk.

Chan, N. W. 2012. Impacts of Disasters and Disasters Risk Management in Malaysia: The Case of Floods. Econ. Welf. Impacts Disasters East Asia Policy Responses. 503-551.

Lindell, M. K., Prater, P. S., Perry, R. W. and Nicholson, W. C. 2006. Fundamentals of Emergency Management. 479.

United Nations. Risk and Poverty in a Changing Climate.

United Nations ISDR. 2004. Living With Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives. 1. Geneva.

United Nations Environment Programme. 2007. Environment and Vulnerability: Emerging Perspective. UNEP. 34.

Malalgoda, C., Amaratunga, R. and Pathirage, C. 2010. Exploring Disaster Risk Reduction In The Built Environment.

The Business Continuity Institute. 2010. Good Practice Guidelines 2010. Business Continuity Institute.

ChildFund. 2015. The Devastating Effects of Natural Disasters. ChildFund International.

Bartlett, J. 2013. Business Continuity Relationship With Other Activities. Business Continuity Institute.

Dickson, S. 2013. Continuity Requirement Analysis 2013. [Online]. Available: https://prezi.com/d36o7q0_awma.

Laugé, J. A., Sarriegi, J. M. and Hernantes. 2013. Disaster Impact Assessment : A Holistic Framework. Proc. 10th Int. ISCRAM Conf. – Baden, Ger. 730-734.

Lindell, M. K. 2011. Recovery And Reconstruction After Disaster. Encycl. Nat. Hazards. 812-825.

United Nations ISDR. 2009. Reducing Disaster Risks through Science. 1-32.

The SANS Institute. 2002. Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Step-by-Step.

Tapsell, S., Mccarthy, S., Faulkner, H. and Alexander, M. 2010. Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-08

How to Cite

IMPACT OF DISASTER TO PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION OGRANISATIONS IN MALAYSIA. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 78(5-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8497