COPPER REMOVAL FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM USING MODIFIED ADSORBENT DERIVED FROM GROUNDWATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE AND RICE HUSK

Authors

  • S. R. M. Kutty Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32160, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • E. H. Ezechi Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32160, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • S. G. Khaw Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32160, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • C. L. Lai Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32160, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • M. H. Isa Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32160, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
  • I. U. Salihi Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32160, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8512

Keywords:

Adsorbents, sludge, rice husk, Copper, Biomass, Heavy metal

Abstract

Copper removal from synthetic wastewater by biomass assisted adsorbents was evaluated in this study. Three different biological reactors of the same size (8.5 L) were aerobically operated at solid retention time (SRT) of 30 days and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 0.8 day. The first reactor was operated with biomass alone as the control reactor. The second reactor consist of biomass and ground water treatment plant sludge (GWTPS) whilst the third reactor consist of biomass and hybrid adsorbent (HA), which comprises 50% of microwaved incinerated rice husk ash (MIRHA) and 50% of GWTPS. The reactors were operated in eight different phases (Phase 1 – 8). Phases 1 – 2 were operated as acclimation period during which the biomass were allowed to stabilize within the reactor without copper addition. From phase 3 – phase 8, copper was added to the influent of the reactors at various concentrations and the reactor performance was monitored every two days. Results revealed that copper removal with the control reactor (RC) was markedly inferior compared with the reactors supported with GWTPS and HA adsorbents. The copper removal in the control reactor was in the range 0.47 – 2.62 mg/L from phase 5 to phase 8. Copper removal in the GWTPS reactor was in the range 0.19 – 0.83 mg/L from phase 5 to phase 8 whereas copper removal in the HA reactor was in the range 0.27 – 1.09 mg/L at the same conditions. Percentage removal of copper was 85 %, 94 % and 95 % for the control, GWTPS and HA reactors, respectively. The adsorbents, GWTPS and HA reactors removed copper effectively. This study demonstrates that solid waste materials such as GWTPS and HA can be beneficially utilized to improve biomass tolerance towards heavy metal toxicity and yields a significant removal of copper.

References

Akbal, F. and Camcı, S. 2011. Copper, Chromium And Nickel Removal From Metal Plating Wastewater By Electrocoagulation. Desalination. 269: 214-222.

I. U. Salihi, S. R. M. Kutty, M. H. Isa, E. Olisa, and N. Aminu, 2015. Adsorption Of Copper Using Modified And Unmodified Sugarcane Bagasse. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 10: 40434-40438.

S. Kutty, E. Ezechi, S. Khaw, C. Lai, and M. Isa, 2015. Comparison Of The Effect Of Two Support Materials On Copper Removal From Aqueous Solution In The Activated Sludge Process. Energy and Sustainability V: Special Contributions. 206: 149.

Al-Rashdi B., Tizaoui C., and Hilal N. 2012. Copper Removal From Aqueous Solutions Using Nano-Scale Diboron Trioxide/Titanium Dioxide (B 2 O 3/Tio 2) Adsorbent. Chemical Engineering Journal. 183: 294-302.

Ezechi, E. H., Isa, M. H., Kutty, S. R. M., and Yaqub, A. 2014. Boron Removal From Produced Water Using Electrocoagulation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 509-514.

Kutty, S., Ezechi, E., Khaw, S., Lai C., and Isa, M. 2014. Evaluation Of Copper Removal Using MIRHA As An Adsorbent In A Continuous Flow Activated Sludge System. Water Pollution XII. 182: 233.

Escobar, C., Soto-Salazar C., and Ines Toral M. 2006. Optimization Of The Electrocoagulation Process For The Removal Of Copper, Lead And Cadmium In Natural Waters And Simulated Wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management. 81: 384-39.

Yang, Q. and Kocherginsky, N. 2007. Copper Removal From Ammoniacal Wastewater Through A Hollow Fiber Supported Liquid Membrane System: Modeling And Experimental Verification. Journal Of Membrane Science. 297: 121-129.

Umar, S. I., Kutty, S. R. M., Isa, M. H., Aminu, N., Henry, E., and Rahim, A. F. B. A. 2015. Biomass as Low-Cost Adsorbents for Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution: A Review of Some Selected Biomass. InCIEC 2014. ed: Springer. 973-987.

Jacinto, M. L. J., David, C. P. C., Perez, T. R., and De Jesus B. R. 2009. Comparative Efficiency Of Algal Biofilters In The Removal Of Chromium And Copper From Wastewater. Ecological Engineering. 35: 856-860.

Aghamohammadi, N., Aziz, H. b. A., Isa, M. H., and Zinatizadeh, A. A. 2007. Powdered Activated Carbon Augmented Activated Sludge Process For Treatment Of Semi-Aerobic Landfill Leachate Using Response Surface Methodology. Bioresource Technology. 98: 3570-3578.

Khor, S., Ng, S., Lim, P., and Seng, C. 2011. The Effects Of Nickel (II) And Chromium (VI) On Oxygen Demand, Nitrogen And Metal Removal In A Sequencing Batch Reactor. Environmental Technology. 32: 1903-1914.

Gikas, P. and Romanos, P. 2006. Effects Of Tri-Valent (Cr (III)) And Hexa-Valent (Cr (VI)) Chromium On The Growth Of Activated Sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 133: 212-217.

Kaduková, J. and VirÄíková, E. 2005. Comparison Of Differences Between Copper Bioaccumulation And Biosorption. Environment International. 31: 227-232.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-08

How to Cite

COPPER REMOVAL FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM USING MODIFIED ADSORBENT DERIVED FROM GROUNDWATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE AND RICE HUSK. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8512