COPPER REMOVAL FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT SYSTEM USING MODIFIED ADSORBENT DERIVED FROM GROUNDWATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE AND RICE HUSK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8512Keywords:
Adsorbents, sludge, rice husk, Copper, Biomass, Heavy metalAbstract
Copper removal from synthetic wastewater by biomass assisted adsorbents was evaluated in this study. Three different biological reactors of the same size (8.5 L) were aerobically operated at solid retention time (SRT) of 30 days and hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 0.8 day. The first reactor was operated with biomass alone as the control reactor. The second reactor consist of biomass and ground water treatment plant sludge (GWTPS) whilst the third reactor consist of biomass and hybrid adsorbent (HA), which comprises 50% of microwaved incinerated rice husk ash (MIRHA) and 50% of GWTPS. The reactors were operated in eight different phases (Phase 1 – 8). Phases 1 – 2 were operated as acclimation period during which the biomass were allowed to stabilize within the reactor without copper addition. From phase 3 – phase 8, copper was added to the influent of the reactors at various concentrations and the reactor performance was monitored every two days. Results revealed that copper removal with the control reactor (RC) was markedly inferior compared with the reactors supported with GWTPS and HA adsorbents. The copper removal in the control reactor was in the range 0.47 – 2.62 mg/L from phase 5 to phase 8. Copper removal in the GWTPS reactor was in the range 0.19 – 0.83 mg/L from phase 5 to phase 8 whereas copper removal in the HA reactor was in the range 0.27 – 1.09 mg/L at the same conditions. Percentage removal of copper was 85 %, 94 % and 95 % for the control, GWTPS and HA reactors, respectively. The adsorbents, GWTPS and HA reactors removed copper effectively. This study demonstrates that solid waste materials such as GWTPS and HA can be beneficially utilized to improve biomass tolerance towards heavy metal toxicity and yields a significant removal of copper.
References
Akbal, F. and Camcı, S. 2011. Copper, Chromium And Nickel Removal From Metal Plating Wastewater By Electrocoagulation. Desalination. 269: 214-222.
I. U. Salihi, S. R. M. Kutty, M. H. Isa, E. Olisa, and N. Aminu, 2015. Adsorption Of Copper Using Modified And Unmodified Sugarcane Bagasse. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 10: 40434-40438.
S. Kutty, E. Ezechi, S. Khaw, C. Lai, and M. Isa, 2015. Comparison Of The Effect Of Two Support Materials On Copper Removal From Aqueous Solution In The Activated Sludge Process. Energy and Sustainability V: Special Contributions. 206: 149.
Al-Rashdi B., Tizaoui C., and Hilal N. 2012. Copper Removal From Aqueous Solutions Using Nano-Scale Diboron Trioxide/Titanium Dioxide (B 2 O 3/Tio 2) Adsorbent. Chemical Engineering Journal. 183: 294-302.
Ezechi, E. H., Isa, M. H., Kutty, S. R. M., and Yaqub, A. 2014. Boron Removal From Produced Water Using Electrocoagulation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 509-514.
Kutty, S., Ezechi, E., Khaw, S., Lai C., and Isa, M. 2014. Evaluation Of Copper Removal Using MIRHA As An Adsorbent In A Continuous Flow Activated Sludge System. Water Pollution XII. 182: 233.
Escobar, C., Soto-Salazar C., and Ines Toral M. 2006. Optimization Of The Electrocoagulation Process For The Removal Of Copper, Lead And Cadmium In Natural Waters And Simulated Wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management. 81: 384-39.
Yang, Q. and Kocherginsky, N. 2007. Copper Removal From Ammoniacal Wastewater Through A Hollow Fiber Supported Liquid Membrane System: Modeling And Experimental Verification. Journal Of Membrane Science. 297: 121-129.
Umar, S. I., Kutty, S. R. M., Isa, M. H., Aminu, N., Henry, E., and Rahim, A. F. B. A. 2015. Biomass as Low-Cost Adsorbents for Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution: A Review of Some Selected Biomass. InCIEC 2014. ed: Springer. 973-987.
Jacinto, M. L. J., David, C. P. C., Perez, T. R., and De Jesus B. R. 2009. Comparative Efficiency Of Algal Biofilters In The Removal Of Chromium And Copper From Wastewater. Ecological Engineering. 35: 856-860.
Aghamohammadi, N., Aziz, H. b. A., Isa, M. H., and Zinatizadeh, A. A. 2007. Powdered Activated Carbon Augmented Activated Sludge Process For Treatment Of Semi-Aerobic Landfill Leachate Using Response Surface Methodology. Bioresource Technology. 98: 3570-3578.
Khor, S., Ng, S., Lim, P., and Seng, C. 2011. The Effects Of Nickel (II) And Chromium (VI) On Oxygen Demand, Nitrogen And Metal Removal In A Sequencing Batch Reactor. Environmental Technology. 32: 1903-1914.
Gikas, P. and Romanos, P. 2006. Effects Of Tri-Valent (Cr (III)) And Hexa-Valent (Cr (VI)) Chromium On The Growth Of Activated Sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 133: 212-217.
Kaduková, J. and VirÄÃková, E. 2005. Comparison Of Differences Between Copper Bioaccumulation And Biosorption. Environment International. 31: 227-232.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.