DIFFERENT GLUELINE THICKNESSES PULL-OUT BEHAVIOUR OF MENGKULANG GLULAM

Authors

  • Tengku Anita Raja Hussin Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur (IUKL), Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Oon Vincent Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur (IUKL), Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rohana Hassan Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8559

Keywords:

Pull-out, glulam joint, thickness

Abstract

Timber connection is still facing inadequacy of engineering studies. Mechanical and adhesive joints are the two main types of connections being used for timber connection. In this study, pull-out strength test is carried to determine the best glue line thickness and the failure modes occur. Three different glue-line thicknesses of 2mm, 3mm and 4mm was tested with holes thicknesses of 14mm, 16mm and 18mm  respectively were drilled on 9 with 3 specimens of each thickness. This test is carried out until failure in the specimen by using the Universal Testing Machine with load capacity of 1000kN and at the rate of 2mm/min. Phenol-resorcinol-formaldehyde (PRF) is the adhesive used for the strengthening purposes with ratio of PRF hardener and resin of 1:5 was used in this experiment. The dowel glued-in steel dowel is 10 mm in diameter from S 235 steel type. For the results; The data shows that glue line thickness of 2mm does generate the highest maximum load compared to 3mm and 4mm of glue line thickness with the value of 2.394kN compared to 2.223kN and 1.789kN respectively. However, glue line thickness of 3mm shows highest breaking load of 1.714kN compared to 1.631kN of 2mm glue line thickness and 1.454kN of 4mm glue line thickness. Therefore, it is proven that the 2mm glue line thickness is more superior in strength and shear stress than 3mm and 4mm of glue line thickness.

References

Hazira, W., Azran M., and Zakiah, A. 2011. Bending Strength Properties of Glued Laminated Timber from Selected Malaysian Hardwood Timber. International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering IJCEE-IJENS. 11: 7-12.

Lee, K. S. 2009. MTC to Promote Glued-Laminated Timber, The Star Online. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my.

Chin, M. Y. 2011. A Wooden Wonder in Glulam, The Star Online. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my.

Frühwald, E., Serrano, E., Toratti, T., Emilsson, A., Thelandersson, S. 2007. Design Of Safe Timber Structures - How Can We Learn From Structural Failures In Concrete, Steel And Timber. Lund University.

Hafizah, M., Zakiah, A., and Azmi, I. 2014. Characteristics of Bonded-In Steel and Carbon-Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) Plates into Timber. Journal of Tropical Forest Science. 178-186.

Ling, Z., Yang, H., Liu, W., Lu, W., Zhou, D., and Wang, L. 2014. Pull-out Strength And Bond Behaviour Of Axially Loaded Rebar Glued-In Glulam. Elsevier. 440-449.

Walker, J., and Xiao, R. 2014. Experimental Testing of a Portal Frame Connection Using Glued-In Steel Rods. Materials and Joints in Timber Structures. 555-566.

Yeboad, D., Taylor, S., McPolin, D., Gilfillan, R., and Gilbert, S. 2011. Behaviour Of Joints With Bonded-In Steel Bars Loaded Parallel To The Grain Of Timber Elements. Elsevier, 2312-2317.

Harvey, K., and Ansell, M. P. 2003. Improved Timber Connections Using Bonded-In GFRP Rods. University of Bath. 1-8.

Fragiacomo, M., and Batchelar, M. 2012. Timber Frame Moment Joints with Glued-In Steel Rods. I: Design. ASCE. 789-798.

P. J. Steer. 2001. EN1995 Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures. Proceedings of the ICE-Civil Engineering. United Kingdom. 144(6): 39-43.

Tlustochowicz, G., Serrano, E., and Steiger, R. 2011. State-of-the-Art Review on Timber Connections with Glued-In Steel Rods. Materials and Structures. 997-1020.

Molina, J. C., Junior, C. C., and Carreira, M. R. 2009. Pullout Strength of Axially Loaded Steel Rods Bonded in Glulam at a 45° Angle to the Grain. Materials Research. 427-432.

Sanjay. 2003 Experimental Investigation of Glued-in Metal dowel with Kempas Timber Joints. Bach. Civil Thesis, Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-09

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

DIFFERENT GLUELINE THICKNESSES PULL-OUT BEHAVIOUR OF MENGKULANG GLULAM. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8559