STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR TERENGGANU FORWARD SCATTER RADAR SEASIDE CLUTTER

Authors

  • Nor Najwa Ismail Applied Electromagnetic Research Group (AERG), Advanced Computing and Communication Communities of Research, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Nur Emileen Abd Rashid Applied Electromagnetic Research Group (AERG), Advanced Computing and Communication Communities of Research, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Zuhani Ismail Khan Applied Electromagnetic Research Group (AERG), Advanced Computing and Communication Communities of Research, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8689

Keywords:

Forward scatter radar, very high frequency, ultra-high frequency, Weibull, Gamma, Log-Logistic, Log-Normal, goodness of fit, root mean square error.

Abstract

The statistical analysis for Terengganu, Malaysia seaside clutter is presented in this paper. The measured clutter data were collected using a prototype of forward scatter radar (FSR) micro-sensor network with very high frequency (VHF) and ultra-high frequency (UHF) bands. Four categories of clutter strength were recorded during the measurements, which are low, medium, strong and very strong clutter. The classes were divided according to the wind speed occurred during the measurements period. The analysis is to determine the best-fit distribution model for the measured clutter data. Four types of distribution models are used in this analysis, which are Weibull, Gamma, Log-Logistic and Log-Normal distribution. One of the goodness of fit (GOF) tests called root mean square error (RMSE) is used to prove which distribution is a better fit to the probability distribution of the measured clutter data. The obtained results show that for 64 MHz with all clutter level strength, Weibull distribution provides better fit and records the lowest RMSE. Weibull distribution also fits best to the clutter data for low clutter of 151 MHz. However, for the rest of clutter level strength for 151 MHz, Gamma distribution is the best-fitted model with lowest RMSE values. Log-Logistic distribution proves to be the best fitted model to all clutter level strength of clutter data for 434 MHz with smallest RMSE values.

References

Cherniakov M., Salous M., Jancovic P., Abdullah R., and Kostylev V. 2005. Forward Scattering Radar for Ground Targets Detection and Recognition. in 2nd EMRS DTC Technical Conference – Edinburgh 2005.

Cherniakov M., Abdullah R. S. A. R., Jancovic P., Salous M., and Chapursky V. 2006. Automatic Ground Target Classification using Forward Scattering Radar. in IEE Proceeding Radar, Sonar and Navigation. 153(5):427–437.

Bahadori-jahromi F. and Sadeghzadeh R. 2012. Applying Forward Scattering Radar in Cellular Systems. in International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT). 2(3):240–248.

Salah M., Rasid M., Abdullah R. R., and Cherniakov M. 2009. Speed Estimation in Forward Scattering Radar by Using Standard Deviation Method. Mod. Appl. Sci.3(3):16–25.

Sizov V. I., Cherniakov M., and Antoniou M. 2007. Forward Scatter RCS Estimation for Ground Targets. in Proceedings of the 4th European Radar Conference. no. October:421–424.

Mahafza B. R. 2000. Clutter and Moving Target Indicator (MTI). in Chapman & Hall/CRC. 303.

Blasch E. P. and Hensel M. 2004. Fusion of Distributions for Radar Clutter Modeling. in IEEE Intl Conf Information Fusion. 629–636.

Anastassopoulos V. and Lampropoulos G. A., 1964. Radar Clutter Modelling using Finite PDF Tail. in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Navigational Electronics, 32(3):256–258.

Watts S. 2008. Radar Sea Clutter Modelling and Simulation - Recent Progress and Future Challenges. in Proceedings IET Seminar on Radar Clutter Modelling.1–7.

Lombardo P., Greco M., Gini F., Farina A., and Billingsley J. B. 2001. Impact of Clutter Spectra on Radar Performance Prediction. in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems. 37(3):1022–1038.

Jackson J. A. and Moses R. L. 2004. Clutter Model for VHF SAR Imagery. in Proceedings of SPIE. 5427(September):271–282.

Valeyrie N., Garello R., Quellec J. M., and Chabah M. 2009. Study of The Modeling of Radar Sea Clutter using The KA Distribution and Methods for Estimating Its Parameters. in Radar Conference Surveillance for a Safer World 2009 RADAR International.6.

Liang J., Liang Q., and Samn S. W. 2008. Foliage Clutter Modeling using the UWB Radar. in IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2008).1937–1941.

Chen Z., Liu X., Wu Z., and Wang X. 2013.The Analysis of Sea Clutter Statistics Characteristics Based on The Observed Sea Clutter of Ku-Band Radar. Proc. Int. Symp. Antennas Propag.2(4):4–7.

Parthiban A., Madhavan J., Radhakrishna P., Savitha D., and Kumar L. S. 2005. On The Probability Distribution Function for Airborne Radar Clutter. in IEEE International Radar Conference.5–9.

Criterion A. I. 2001.Weibull, Log-Weibull and K-Distributed Ground Clutter Modeling Analyzed by AIC. in IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems. 37(3).

The MathWorks, 2012. [Online]. From: http://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/continuous-distributions.html. [Accessed on 25 May 2015].

Ismail N. N., Rashid N. E. A., Zakaria N. A., Ismail Khan Z., and Sizov V. 2015. Clutter Modeling for Forward Scatter Radar (FSR) Micro-Sensor Network with Ultra High Frequency (UHF) Band. in IEEE 11th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & its Applications.116–120

Downloads

Published

2016-05-19

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR TERENGGANU FORWARD SCATTER RADAR SEASIDE CLUTTER. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5-7). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8689