EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ON THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY. PRELIMINARY RESEARCH REPORT OF AUTOCLAVE PILOT SURVEY

Authors

  • Noor Ashikin Said Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Eric Olmedo Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Che Zulhaimee Abdullah Human Capital and Administration, CTRM Aerocomposite, 75350 Batu Berendam, Melaka, Malaysia
  • Razman Shah Rajab Aerospace Malaysia Innovation Centre (AMIC), Composites Technology City, 75350 Batu Berendam, Melaka, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8837

Keywords:

Virtualized, linguistics, technology, aerospace manufacturing, Malaysia

Abstract

Worldwide employee turnover in 2014 had hit the average of 18.5% (voluntary and involuntarily) (Radford 2014). Without exception, Malaysia‟s aerospace manufacturing industries have dealt with the same issue of high turnover rate for a long time. The human resource management of Composite Research Technology Malaysia (CTRM) has stepped out as the pioneer to be involved in an experiment to mitigate this issue. Therefore, there is a need to come out with a virtualized training tool that can help in cutting the cost and the duration of training new workers. An exploratory research has been conducted focusing on the linguistics aspect of the training tool. This report aimed to profile the technicians and to detect gaps between what is perceived and the actual reality on the floor, so that the technology could be transferred effectively. Semi-structured interviews, direct observation and focus group were used as the methodological approach to collect the data. The results indicate that their English competency is generally low. Malay language is used in all aspects of verbal communication. The glossary used for the instruction board is not comprehensible enough for the technicians and they have their own specific way of perceiving time at workplace.

References

Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., and Pelz, J. B. 1996. Memory Representations In Natural Tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7: 66–80.

Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T. 2013. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Bourdieu, P. 1996. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.

DiMaggio, P. 2001. Social Stratification, Life-style and Social Cognition. In Social Stratification: Class, Race, and Gender in Sociological Perspective. Ed. David, B. Grusky. Boulder: Westview Press.

E. O. Wright. 2005. Foundations of Pierre Boudieu’s Class Analysis In Approaches to Class Analysis. Combridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ernest. W, A. 2004. Fundamentals of Game Design. USA: New Riders.

Goldthorpe, J. H., and Jackson, M. 2007. Intergenerational Class Mobility in Contemporary Britain: Political Concerns And Empirical Findings. The British Journal of Sociology. 58(4): 525-546.

Jeffries, P. R., Woolf, S., and Linde, B. 2003. Technology-Based Vs. Traditional Instruction: A Comparison Of Two Methods For Teaching The Skill Of Performing A 12-lead ECG. Nursing Education Perspectives. 24(2): 70-74.

Quinn, F., P. Keogh, A. McDonald, and D. Hussey. 2003. A Study Comparing the Effectiveness of Conventional Training and Virtual Reality Simulation in the Skills Acquisition of Junior Dental Students. European Journal of Dental Education. 7(4): 164-169.

Riva, G., Davide, W., and Ijsselsteijn, W. A. 2003. Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurement of User Presence in Synthetic Environments. Amsterdam: Ios Press.

Sajogyo, P. 2007. Sosiologi Pembangunan. Michigan: Fakultas Pasca Sarjana. IKIP Jakarta.

Seel, N. M., and Winn, W. D. 1997. Research on Media and Learning: Distributed Cognition Semiotics. In Tennyson, R.D., Schott, F., Seel, N., and Dijkstra, S. (ed). Instruction Design: international perspectives. I: 293-326.

Selwood, D., Fung, A., and Christopher, D. 2003. Management of Education in the Information Age: The Role of ICT. USA: Springer.

Sulbaran, T., and Baker, N.C. 2000. Enhancing Engineering Education through Distributed Virtual Reality, Frontiers. Education Conference, Sch. of Civil & Environ. Eng., Georgia Inst. of Technol., Atlanta. 10 November 2000.

Thélot, C. and Vallet, L. A. 2001. Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment. Sociology. 35: 893-912.

Tzanakis, M. 2011. Bourdieu‟s Social Reproduction Thesis and the Role of Cultural Capital in Educational Attainment: A Critical Review of Key Empirical Studies. Education Journal. 11(1): 76-90.

Urbankova, A., and Lichtenthal, R. M. 2002. Dentist Virtual Reality In Preclinical Operative Dentistry To Improve Psychomotor Skills: A Pilot Study. Journal of Dental Education. 66(2): 284-292.

William, R. S., and Alan, B. C. 2003. Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application and Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Winn, W. D., Hoffman, H., Hollander, A., Osberg, K., Rose, H., and Char, P. 1997. The Effect Of Student Construction Of Virtual Worlds On The Performance Of High And Low Ability Students. Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.

Yantis, S. 1996. Attentional Capture In Vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (ed), Converging Operations In The Study Of Visual Selective Attention. 45–76. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-30

How to Cite

EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ON THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY. PRELIMINARY RESEARCH REPORT OF AUTOCLAVE PILOT SURVEY. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5-10). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8837