EVALUATION ON THE APPLICATIONS OF SMALL SIZE COILED TUBING IN WELL SERVICES

Authors

  • Jirawat Chewaroungroaj Department of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University Thailand, 10330 Thailand
  • Thanawit Ounsakul Department of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University Thailand, 10330 Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8971

Keywords:

Oil and Gas, Well Services, Simulation, Coiled Tubing, Produce to limit

Abstract

Today, one of the most important key for hydrocarbon production in the oil & gas industry is economic justification. In the later state of the well’s production, the aging wells may introduce many problems such as scale, sand and liquid load-up. These impede the hydrocarbon production, preventing all the reserve to be fully produced. In order to fight this impedance, the use of small size coiled tubing is a promising practice, although has its own limit. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the limit of well services applications of small size Coiled Tubing (1" and 1.25") in various oil & gas well scenarios. The evaluation utilizes the computer modeling which is used to determine the hydraulic and mechanic operating conditions. Our study found the viability of 1†CT in the low inclination well scenarios with the lower pumping rate requirement, while 1.25†CT can be used in all of well services applications and scenarios.

References

Portman, L. 1999. The Science and Economics behind Coiled Tubing String Design and optimization, SPE-ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable. Texas, USA.

Jelinek, W., El-Mabrouk, K., Biezen, E., Leybourne, D. and de Jonge, R. M. 2011. Well Interventions in Depleted Gas Wells Made Economical With Use of Small Size (3/4 in.) Coiled Tubing. SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, Texas, USA.

Stanley, R. and Terry, A. 2014. Coiled Tubing Growth and Benefits of Thinking Small Again. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Arangath, R., Falxa, P., Ackers, M., Ramsey, M. 2003. Coiled Tubing Operations from a Floating Anchored Vessel. SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference. Texas, USA.

Long, N., Raj, R. and Son, N. H. 2011. Coiled Tubing Operations From a Work Boat. SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conferece and Exhibition. Texas, USA.

Sundramurthy, D., Dean, G., Stanley, F., Terry, A. 2014. Small, Lightweight CTU Helps Enhance Production from Limited-Space Offshore Platform. Offshore Technology Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Ingvardsen, D. and Kritzler, J. 2009. Monobore Completion System Provides Low-Cost Completion Option. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Louisiana, USA.

Luo, Y. and Bern, P. A. 1992. Flow-Rate Predictions for Cleaning Deviated Wells. IADC Drilling Conference. Louisiana, USA.

McCann, R. C. and Islas, C. G. 1996. Frictional Pressure Losses during Turbulent Flow in Coiled Tubing, SPE-ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable. Texas, USA.

Jiang Wu. and Juvkam-Wold, H. C. 1993. Drilling and Completing Horizontal Wells with Coiled Tubing. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Texas, USA.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-12

How to Cite

EVALUATION ON THE APPLICATIONS OF SMALL SIZE COILED TUBING IN WELL SERVICES. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8971