EFFECT OF LOW TEMPERATURE CO2 INJECTION IN HIGH TEMPERATURE OIL RESERVOIRS USING SLIMTUBE EXPERIMENT

Authors

  • Zakaria Hamdi Center of Research in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia
  • Mariyamni Awang Center of Research in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Department of Petroleum Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9018

Keywords:

CO2 injection, Slimtube Displacement, Enhanced Oil Recovery

Abstract

A set of slimtube experiments is designed and presented to study the effect of cold temperature CO2 on recovery factor in reservoirs with high temperature. The comparison of the results indicates the positive effect of temperature on recovery trend in early stage as well as ultimate recovery in different injection pressures. The approach is based on a long slimtube to show the effect of temperature on the recovery. The study considers different temperatures and pressures of injection and reservoir allowing both miscible and immiscible flooding of CO2. Using non-isothermal conditions, the results show that, lowering temperature of injection can yield in higher recovery in early stage significantly. Also, considering ultimate recovery, it is observed that low temperature CO2 injection into high temperature reservoir can result in slightly higher recovery factor than isothermal injection. The reason for recovery increase is mainly due to elimination of the interfacial tension between CO2 and reservoir fluids especially near the injection point. Another finding is that the minimum miscibility pressures is lowered by means of lowering the temperature of injection which is again caused by elimination of interfacial tension between CO2 and oil. This is important because forming a single phase can increase the ability of CO2 to extract different components of the crude oil as well as lowering viscosity of the mixture, resulting in a better sweep efficiency. It appears that using liquid CO2 in high temperature reservoirs can be a promising method for better oil recovery in high temperature reservoirs. 

References

Lake, L. W. 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.

D. W. Green, G. P. Willhite, and S. o. P. E. (U.S.) 1998. Enhanced Oil Recovery/Don W. Green, G. Paul Willhite.

Moritis G. 2004. EOR Continues to Unlock the Oil Resources. Oil and Gas Journal. 45-52.

M. Latil 1980, Enhanced Oil Recovery. Paris, France: Éditions Technip.

Lake, L. W. 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Incorporated.

Green D. W. and Willhite G. P. 1998. Enhanced Oil Recovery Vol. 6 Of Of SPE Textbook Series. New York: Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Holm, L. W. 1982. CO2 Flooding: Its Time Has Come. J. Pet. Technol. 34: 2739-2745.

Holm, L. W. and Josendal, V. A. 1982. Effect of Oil Composition on Miscible-Type Displacement by Carbon Dioxide. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 22: 87-98.

Orr, F. and Taber, J. 1984. Use of Carbon Dioxide in Enhanced Oil Recovery. Science. 224: 563-569.

Blunt, M., Fayers, F. J., and Orr, F. M. 1993. Carbon Dioxide in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Energy Convers. Manage. 34: 1197-1204.

Metcalfe, R. S., Fussell, D. D., and Shelton, J. L. 1973. A Multicell Equilibrium Separation Model for the Study of Multiple Contact Miscibility in Rich-Gas Drives. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. 13: 147-155.

Neau, E., Avaullée, L., and Jaubert, J. N. 1996. A New Algorithm For Enhanced Oil Recovery Calculations. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 117: 265-272.

Wang, Y. and Orr, Jr F. M. 1997. Analytical Calculation Of Minimum Miscibility Pressure. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 139: 101-124

Emera, M. K. and Sarma, H. K. 2005. Use of Genetic Algorithm to Predict Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) between Flue Gases and Oil in Design of Flue Gas Injection Project, presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Emera, M. K. and Sarma, H. K. 2006. A Reliable Correlation To Predict the Change in Minimum Miscibility Pressure When CO2 Is Diluted With Other Gases. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 9: 366-373.

Huang, Y. F., Huang, G. H., Dong, M. Z., and Feng, G. M. 2003. Development Of An Artificial Neural Network Model For Predicting Minimum Miscibility Pressure In CO2 Flooding. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 37: 83-95.

Yellig, W. F. and Metcalfe, R. S. 1980. Determination and Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures (includes associated paper 8876). SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology. 32: 160-168.

Christiansen, R. L. and Haines, H. K. 1987. Rapid Measurement of Minimum Miscibility Pressure with the Rising-Bubble Apparatus. SPE Reservoir Engineering. 2: 523-527.

Rao, D. N. 1997. A New Technique Of Vanishing Interfacial Tension For Miscibility Determination. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 139: 311-324.

Stalkup, F. I. 1992. Miscible Displacement. New York: Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME.

Hamdi, Z. and Awang, M. 2013. Improving Oil Recovery by Cold CO2 Injection: A Simulation Study. International Journal of Petroleum and Geoscience Engineering (IJPGE). 1: 167-177.

Hamdi, Z. and Awang, M. 2014. CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure Determination of Pure Hydrocarbons in Different Temperatures Using Slimtube Simulations, Research. Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 7: 3159-3163.

Hamdi, Z., Awang, M. Bt., and Moradi, B. 2014. Low Temperature Carbon Dioxide Injection in High Temperature Oil Reservoirs. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-13

How to Cite

EFFECT OF LOW TEMPERATURE CO2 INJECTION IN HIGH TEMPERATURE OIL RESERVOIRS USING SLIMTUBE EXPERIMENT. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9018