CONTROL OF A COUPLED TANK SYSTEM USING PI CONTROLLER WITH ADVANCED CONTROL METHODS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9419Keywords:
Level control, PI controller, Control Tuning, Feedforward, Internal Model Control, Gain SchedulingAbstract
The liquid level control in tanks and flow control between cascaded or coupled tanks are the basic control problems exist in process industries nowadays. Liquids are to be pumped, stored or mixed in tanks for various types of chemical processes and all these require essential control and regulation of flow and liquid level. In this paper, different types of tuning methods are proposed for Proportional-Integral (PI) controller and are further improved with integration of Advanced Process Control (APC) method such as feedforward and gain scheduling to essentially control the liquid level in Tank 2 of a coupled tank system. The MATLAB/Simulink tools are used to design PI controller using pole-placement, Ciancone, Cohen Coon and modified Ziegler-Nichols tuning method with Cohen Coon tuning method found to have a better performance. Advanced process control such as feedforward-plus-PI, Gain Scheduling (GS) based PI, Internal Model Control (IMC) based PI, feedforward-plus-GS-based PI and feedforward-plus-IMC-based PI controllers are further tested as improvement version to further compare the significance of the advanced process control outcomes hence GS-PI, improved GI-base PI-plus FF found to have better performance. The GS method is built over five operating points to approximate the system’s nonlinearity and is eventually combined with feedforward control to yield a much better performance.
References
JE. P. Gatzke, E. S. Meadows, C. Wang, and F. Doyle. 2000. Model Based Control Of A Four-Tank System. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 24: 1503-1509.
T. Marlin. 2000. Process Control, Designing Processes and Control Systems for Dynamic Performance. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
K. J. Astrom and T. Hagglund. 1995. PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning. 2nd ed: Instrument Society of America.
D. E. Rivera, M. Morari, and S. Skogestad. 1986. Internal Model Control: PID Controller Design. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development. 25: 252-265.
F. Wu, X. H. Yang, A. Packard, G. Becker. 1996. Induced L2-Norm Control for LPV Systems with Bounded Parameter Variation Rates. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control. 6: 2379-2383.
D. E. Seborg, T. F. Edgar, and D. A. Mellichamp. 1989 Process Control Dynamics. 1st ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc.
J. Barroud, Y. Creff and N. Petit. 2004. PI Controllers Performance for A Process Model with Varying Delay. Control Conference, University of Bath, United Kingdom.
A. Hassaan. 2014. Tuning of a PD-PI Controller used with First-OrderDelayed Processes. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. 3(4).
F. Wang, V. Balakrishnan. 2002. Improved Stability Analysis And Gain-Scheduled Controller Synthesis For Parameter-Dependent Systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 47(5): 720-734.
W. J. Rugh, J. S. Shamma. 2000. A Survey Of Research On Gain-Scheduling. Automatica. 36: 1401-1425.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
