A SHORT REVIEW ON USING CRUMB RUBBER AS MODIFICATION OF BITUMEN BINDER

Authors

  • Md. Maniruzzaman A. Aziz Department of Geotechnic and Transporation, Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Zohair Ahmed Altieb Department of Geotechnic and Transporation, Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Khairul Anuar Bin Kassim Department of Geotechnic and Transporation, Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hauwa Baffa Jibrin Department of Geotechnic and Transporation, Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9479

Keywords:

Crumb rubber, fatigue cracking resistance, potential rutting resistance

Abstract

The increasing consumption of waste tire has generated many problems such as increasing landfill space, environmental pollution and causing health hazards. Parallel to this is the increasing of roads construction as a result of heavy traffic on roads. This study reviews to the use of crumb rubber (waste tires in powder form) in bitumen using the wet process. The study focuses on the crumb rubber as a replacement to the total weight of bitumen. The design or life span for all highways and urban roads is 10 – 20 years. Unfortunately, damages or distresses on pavements are still occurring before reaching the maximum period of the designed road serviceability. Among the major influencing factor that is contributing to this distress is the repeated heavy traffic loading on the road surfaces. Moreover, the use of waste crumb rubber in road construction as a pavement surface has a better skid resistance, fatigue crack resistance and increased rut resistance. The review includes physical tests that are used to determine the physical properties of bitumen and modified crumb rubber mix. The physical tests involve penetration test, softening point test and viscosity test. The second stage is rheological tests like rolling thin film oven test (RTFOT), pressure aging vessel (PAV) and dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) tests. The expectations from the study are to develop bitumen with waste crumb rubber that would minimize the costs of bitumen and providing better physical and rheological properties compared to the convention bitumen based on the tests that was conducted. Crumb rubber modifier as improved resistance to rutting due to high viscosity, Improved resistance to surface initiated, reduce fatigue/ reflection cracking, lower pavement maintenance costs, and saving in energy and natural resource.

References

Bahia, H.U., D. Perdomo, R. Schwartz, and B. Takallou. January. 1997.Use of Superpav Technology for Design and Construction of Rubberized Asphalt Mixtures. Presented at the 76th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.

Bahia, Hussain and Robert Davies.1994. Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifiers (CRM) on Performance-Related Properties of Bitumens. Journal AAPT 1994. 414-441.

Amirkhanian, S. and Corley, M. 2004. Utilization of Rubberized Asphalt in the United Statesan Overview. Proceedings of 04 International Symposium Advanced.

Takallou H. B., Takallou M. B.1991. Recycling Tires in Rubber Asphalt Paving Yields Cost, Disposal Benefits, Elastomerics. 123: 19-24.

Harvey, J., Bejarano, M., Popescu, L. 2000. Accelerated Pavement Testing of Rutting and Cracking Performance of Asphalt–Rubber and Conventional Asphalt Concrete Overlay Strategies. Conference on Asphalt Rubber, Vilamoura, Portugal.

Osman, S. and A. Adam, 2012. Evaluation of Crumb Tire Rubber-Modified Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete in Sudan. Sustainable Construction Materials: 235-248. [7] Othman, A. M, 2006. Fracture Resistance of Rubber-modified Asphaltic Mixtures Exposed to High-Temperature Cyclic Aging. Sage Publishers. Journal of Elastomers and Plastics. 38: 19-32 available at http://jep.sagepub.com. [8] Ibrahim M. R, Katman H. Y, Rehan M, Mahrez A. 2009. Properties of Rubberised Bitumen Mixes Prepared With Wet And Dry Mixing Process. Proc. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 7: 1-11. [9] Liu S, Cao W, Fang J, Shang S. 2009. Variance Analysis And Performance Evaluation Of Different Crumb Rubber Modified (CRM) Asphalt. Constr. Build. Mater. 23: 2701-2708 [10] Katman H. Y, Karim M. R, Mahrez A, Ibrahim M. R, 2005a. Performance of Wet Mix Rubberized Porous Asphalt. Proc. Eastern Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 5: 695-708 [11] Souza and Weissman 1994. Using a Binder With 15% Rubber Content (Size Of 0.2,0.4 And 0.6mm). In Dense- Graded Bitumen. [12] Adil Al Tamimi, Isam A. H. Al Zubaidy, AbhijitUpadhye, Liyakat Ali, 2014. Evaluation of Sustainable Asphalt Mixture. Science and Engineering Publishing Company. [13] Huang, Yue, Roger N. Bird, and Oliver Heidrich. 2007. A Review Of The Use Of Recycled Solid Waste Materials In Asphalt Pavements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling (Elsevier) 52: 58-73.

Shatanawi, Khaldoun M, Szabolcs Biro, Andras Geiger, Anderji N. Amirkhanian, 2012. Effects of Furfural Activated Crumb Rubber On The Properties Of Rubberized Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials. 28(1): 96–103. [15] Mohamed, A. A. 2007. A Study on the Physical and hanical Properties Of Asphaltic Concrete Incorporating Crumb Rubber Produced Through Dry Process [TA443.A7]. Universiti Sains Malaysia. [16] CalTrans, 2005. Use of Scrap Tire Rubber - State of Technology and Best Practices. State of California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California. [17] Huang, B., Mohammad, L. N., Graves, P. S., and Abadie C. 2002. Louisiana Experience with Crumb-Rubber Modified Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavement. Transportation Research Board. 1789: 1-13. [18] Way, G. B., Kaloush, K. U., and Biligiri, K. P., 2011. Asphalt-Rubber Practice Guide. Final Report. Rubber Pavement Association, Tempe, Arizona. [19] Gowda, G. V., Elliott, R. P., and Hall, K. D. 1996. Effect of Rubber on Asphalt Mixes, TRC No. 9404, Mack-Blackwell Transportation Center, Fayetteville, Arkansas. [20] Hensley, J. 1998. Establishing Hot Mix Asphalt Mixing And Compaction. Asphalt Institute Regional Engineer and Al-Palmer. [21] Palit, S. K. 2001. An Investigation On Bituminous Mixtures Modified with Reclaimed Crumb Rubber. PhD Thesis. Indian Institute of Technology. [22] Bureau of Indian Standards. 1978b. Methods For Testing Tar And Bituminous materials; Determination Of Penetration. IS:1203, New Delhi, India. [23] Indian Roads Congress IRC. 1999. Tentative Guidelines OnUse Of Polymer And Rubber Modified Bitumen In Road Construction. SP: 53, New Delhi, India. [24] SABITA. 1993. Large Aggregate Mixes For Bases (LAMBS). Manual 13, Roggebaai, South Africa. [25] Ministry of Surface Transport (MOST). 2000. Specifications for Road And Bridge Works, 3rd Rev., Road Wing, Govt of India, New Delhi. [26] Ohri, S. 1999. An Investigation On Fatigue Of Bituminous Mixtures. M. Tech Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India. [27] Bureau of Indian Standards. 1971. Methods for Testing For Determination Of Stripping Value Of Road Aggregates. IS:6241, New Delhi, India. [28] ASTM. 2001. Standard Practice For Effect Of Water On Bituminous Coated Aggregate Using Boiling Water. 3625-96, West Conshocken, Pa. [29] Vallerga, B., Finn, F., and Hicks, R. 1972. Effect Of Asphalt Aging On The Fatigue Properties Of Asphalt Concrete. Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Asphalt Pavements, Ann Arbor, Mich. 595–617. [30] Schnormeier, R. H. 1986. Fifteen-year Pavement Condition History Ofasphalt Rubber Membranes in Phoenix, Arizona. Transportation Research Record, 1096, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. 62–67. [31] Charania, E., Cano, J. O., and Schnormeier, R. H. 1991. Twenty-year Study Of Asphalt Rubber Pavements InPhoenix. Transportation Research Record, 1307, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. 29–38. [32] Bahia, H. U., and Davies, R. 1994. Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifiers On Performance Related Properties Of Asphalt Binders.J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., St. Louis. 63: 414–449. [33] McGennis, R. B. 1995. Evaluation Of Physical Properties Of Fine Crumb Rubber-Modified Asphalt Binders. Transportation Research Record. 1488. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 62–71. [34] Liang, R. Y., and Lee, S. 1996. Short-Term And Long-Term Aging Behavior Of Rubber-Modified Asphalt Paving Mixture. Transportation Research Record. 1530. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 11–17. [35] Harvey, J., and Tsai, B.-W. 1997. Long-Term Oven Aging Effects On Fatigue And Initial Stiffness Of Asphalt Concrete. Transportation Research Record. 1590. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 89–98.

Raad, L., Saboundjian, S., and Minassian, G. 2001. Field Aging Effectson Fatigue Of Asphalt Concrete And Asphalt-Rubber Concrete. Transportation Research Record. 1767. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 126–13

Downloads

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

A SHORT REVIEW ON USING CRUMB RUBBER AS MODIFICATION OF BITUMEN BINDER. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(7-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9479