INHERENT SAFETY INDEX FOR PROTON MEMBRANE FUEL CELL VEHICLE SYSTEM

Authors

  • Nazatul Niza Nordin IKIP International College,25050 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Wijayanuddin Ali Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • Umi Aisah Asli Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • Arshad Ahmad Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • Kamarizan Kidam Centre of Hydrogen Energy, Institute of Future Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9575

Keywords:

Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell, fuel cell system, process industry, inherent safety

Abstract

There are enormous numbers of indices being developed in process industries to describe, rank or quantify hazards to the people, properties and environments. Most indices are being applied to large scale and complex systems of process industries. Development of a swift and simple inherent safety index method which is relevant to small scale, less complex membrane fuel cell system particularly the one which to be applied during an early design stage is essential as an alternative to current comprehensive and yet time-consuming indices. In this work, a modified version of PIIS, modified prototype index for inherent safety (m-PIIS) was developed with the objectives of identifying, indicating and estimating inherent safety of fuel cell system at early design stage. The developed index was applied on four proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell systems; high pressure PEMFC system, low pressure PEMFC system, LH2 PEMFC system and on-board Me-OH PEMFC system. The developed index was also benchmarked against the original PIIS and ISI using the published results for the selection of process routes in MMA production. Results have indicated that m-PIIS has strong positive relationship with PIIS and ISI on most of the reaction step in MMA with the most significant are the C4, TBA, and C3 reaction steps. Other reaction steps such as C2/MP, C2/PA and ACH showed a strong positive relationship as well

References

Palaniappan, C., Srinivasan, R. And Tan, R. 2004. Selection of Inherently Safer Process Route: A Case Study. Chemical Engineering and Processing. 43: 647 – 653.

Heikkila, A.M. 1999. Inherent Safety in Process Plant Design – An Index-Based Approach. Doctor of Technology. Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.

Hurme, M. and Rahman, M. 2005. Implementing Inherent Safety Throughout Process Lifecycle. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 18: 238 – 244.

Rahman, M., Heikkila, A.M. and Hurme, M. 2005. Comparison of Inherent Safety Indices in Process Concept Evaluation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 18: 327 – 334.

Gupta, J.P. and Edwards, D.W. 2003. A Simple Graphical Method for Measuring Inherent Safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 104: 15 – 30.

Gupta, J.P. and Edwards, D.W. 2002. Inherently Safer Design – Present and Future. TransICheme Part B. 80: 115 – 125.

Edwards, D.W. and Lawrence, D. 1993. Assessing the Inherent Safety of Chemical Process Routes: Is there A Relation between Plant Costs and Inherent Safety? Chemical Engineering Research and Design Part B. 71: 252 – 258.

Gentile, M., Rogers, W.J. and Mannan, M.S. 2003. Development of A Fuzzy Logic-based Inherent Safety Index. Trans ICheme Part B. 81: 444 – 455.

Koller, G., Fischer, U. and Hungerbuhler, K. 2001. Comparison of Methods Suitable for Assessing the Hazard Potential of Chemical Processes during Early Design Phase. Trans ICheme Part B. 79: 157 – 166.

Crowl, DA. And Louvar, J.F. 2002. Chemical Process Safety - Fundamentals with Applications. 2nd ed. : Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Crowl, D.A. and Jo, Y.D. 2007. The Hazards and Risks of Hydrogen. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 20: 158 – 164.

Adamson, K.A. and Pearson, P. 2000. Hydrogen and Methanol: A Comparison of Safety, Economics, Efficiencies and Emissions. Journal of Power Sources. 86: 548 – 555.

Bultel, Y., Aurousseau, M. and Perrin, L. 2007. Risk Analysis on A Fuel Cell in Electric Vehicle using the MADS / MOSAR Methodology. Trans ICheme Part B. 85(B3): 241 – 250.

Edwards, D.W. and Lawrence, D. 1993. Assessing the Inherent Safety of Chemical Process Routes: Is there a Relation between Plant Costs and Inherent Safety. Chemical Engineering Research & Design. 71(Part B): 252-258.

Heikkila, A.M., Hurme, M. And Jarvelainen, M. 1996. Safety Considerations in Process Synthesis. Computers Chemical Engineering. 20: S115–S120.

Leong, C.T. and Shariff, A.M. 2008. Inherent Safety Index Module (ISIM) to Assess Inherent Safety Level during Preliminary Design Stage. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 86: 113 – 119

Downloads

Published

2016-08-10

How to Cite

INHERENT SAFETY INDEX FOR PROTON MEMBRANE FUEL CELL VEHICLE SYSTEM. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(8-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9575