COMPARISON OF FLOW FIELD BETWEEN STEADY AND UNSTEADY FLOW OF AN AUTOMOTIVE MIXED FLOW TURBOCHARGER TURBINE

Authors

  • M.H. Padzillah UTM Centre for Low Carbon Transport in cooperation with Imperial College London, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • S. Rajoo UTM Centre for Low Carbon Transport in cooperation with Imperial College London, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • R.F. Martinez-Botas Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9578

Keywords:

Mixed-flow turbine, computational fluid dynamics, pulsating flow

Abstract

Global decarbonizing efforts in transportation industry have forced the automotive manufacturers to opt for highly downsized high power-to-weight ratio engines. Since its invention, turbocharger remains as integral element in order to achieve this target. However, although it has been proven that a turbocharger turbine works in highly pulsatile environment, it is still designed under steady state assumption. This is due to the lack of understanding on the nature of pulsating flow field within the turbocharger turbine stage. This paper presents an effort to visualize the pulsating flow feature using experimentally validated Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. For this purpose, a lean-vaned mixed-flow turbine with rotational speed of 30000 rpm at 20 Hz flow frequency, which represent turbine operation for 3-cylinder 4-stroke engine operating at 800 rpm has been used. Results indicated that the introduction of pulsating flow has resulted in more irregular pattern of flow field as compared to steady flow operation. It has also been indicated that the flow behaves very differently between pressure increment and decrement instances. During the pressure decrement instance, flow blockage in terms of low pressure region occupies most of the turbine passage as the flow exit the turbine. 

References

J. W. Lam, Q. D. H. Roberts, and G. T. McDonnel. 2002. Flow Modelling of a Turbocharger Turbine Under Pulsating Flow, Preceedings IMechE Int. Conf. Turbochargers Turbocharging (Mechanical Eng. Publ. London). 181–197.

D. Palfreyman and R. F. Martinez-Botas. 2004. The Pulsating Flow Field in a Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine: An Experimental and Computational Study. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2004. 5:697–708.

N. Karamanis, R. F. Martinez-Botas, and C. C. Su. 2001. Mixed Flow Turbines: Inlet and Exit Flow Under Steady and Pulsating Conditions. J. Turbomach. 123(2):359.

F. Hellstrom and L. Fuchs. 2008. Effects of Inlet Conditions on the Turbine Performance of a Radial Turbine. Turbomachinery, Parts A, B, and C. 6:1985–2001.

M. H. Padzillah, S. Rajoo, M. Yang, and R. F. Martinez-Botas. 2015. Influence of Pulsating Flow Frequencies Towards the Flow Angle Distributions of an Automotive Turbocharger Mixed-flow Turbine. Energy Conversion and Management. 98:449–462.

M. H. Padzillah, S. Rajoo, and R. F. Martinez-Botas. 2015. Flow Field Analysis of an Automotive Mixed Flow Turbocharger Turbine, Jurnal Teknologi. 77(8): 21–27.

M. H. Padzillah, S. Rajoo, and R. F. Martinez-Botas. 2012. Numerical Assessment of Unsteady Flow Effects on a Nozzled Turbocharger Turbine. Proc ASME Turbo Expo Paper No. GT2012-69062. 8:745-756.

C. D. Copeland, R. Martinez-Botas, and M. Seiler. 2011. Comparison Between Steady and Unsteady Double-Entry Turbine Performance Using the Quasi-Steady Assumption. Journal of Turbomachinery. 133(3):031001.

C. D. Copeland, R. Martinez-Botas, and M. Seiler. 2008. Unsteady Performance of a Double Entry Turbocharger Turbine With a Comparison to Steady Flow Conditions. Volume 6: Turbomachinery, Parts A, B, and C. 6:1579–1588

C. D. Copeland, P. J. Newton, R. Martinez-Botas and M. Seiler. 2010. The Effect of Unequal Admission on the Performance and Loss Generation in a Double-Entry Turbocharger Turbine. Proc ASME Turbo Expo No. GT2010-22212.

P. Newton, R. Martinez-Botas, and M. Seiler. 2014. A Three-Dimensional Computational Study of Pulsating Flow Inside a Double Entry Turbine. Journal of Turbomachinery. 137(3):031001.

A. Dale and N. Watson. 1986. Vaneless Radial Turbocharger Turbine Performance. Proc. IMechE Int. Conf. Turbocharging Turbochargers. 65–76.

S. Szymko. 2006. The Development Of An Eddy Current Dynamometer For Evaluation Of Steady And Pulsating Turbocharger Turbine Performance, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London.

S. Rajoo and R. Martinez-Botas. 2006. Experimental Study On The Performance Of A Variable Geometry Mixed Flow Turbine For Automotive turbocharger. 8th International Conference on Turbochargers and Turbocharging. 183–192.

M. Abidat. 1991. Design and Testing of a Highly Loaded Mixed Flow Turbine, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-16

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF FLOW FIELD BETWEEN STEADY AND UNSTEADY FLOW OF AN AUTOMOTIVE MIXED FLOW TURBOCHARGER TURBINE. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(8-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9578