ROCK BEARING RESISTANCE OF BORED PILES SOCKETED INTO ROCK

Authors

  • Eda Suhaili Sharudin HLA Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan
  • Nor Zurairahetty Mohd Yunus Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Aminaton Marto Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Siti Norafida Jusoh Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Kamarudin Ahmad Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Fauziah Kasim Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Rini Asnida Abdullah Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Azril Hezmi Department of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9638

Keywords:

Rock bearing resistance, uniaxial compressive strength, RQD, granite, bored pile

Abstract

In view of the large movement required to mobilise the base resistance of bored piles and difficulty in base cleaning, the end bearing resistance often ignored in current design practice that will result in excessive rock socket length. Many attempts have been made to correlate the end bearing resistance with the uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock and the RQD but it is uncertain how applicable they are to rock type in Malaysia. This paper attempts to review the applicability of the formulas from previous studies to rock type in Malaysia. A program of field tests for 13 bored piles with diameter varying from 1000 mm to 1500 mm constructed in granite was conducted to measure the axial response of bored piles, tested using static load test and high strain load dynamic test to verify its integrity and performance. The results were evaluated and compared to the predicted rock bearing resistance. Based on the result obtained, the method by AASHTO gives the best prediction of rock bearing resistance for granite in Malaysia. However the relationship between compressive strength and rock discontinuities with the rock bearing resistance showed scattered results

References

Williams, A. F., and Pells, P. J. N. 1981. Side Resistance of Rock Sockets in Sandstone, Mudstone, and Shale. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 18(4): 502–513.

Crapps, D. K., and Schmertmann, J. H. 2002. Compression Top Load Reaching Shaft Bottom — Theory Versus Tests. In Proceedings of the International Deep Foundations Congress, Orlando, Fla., 14–16 February 2002.Geotechnical Special Publication No. 116.Edited by M.W. O’Neill and F.C. Townsend. Geo-Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, 2:1533–1549.

Turner, J. 2006. Rock-Socketed Shafts for Highway Structure Foundations: A Synthesis of Highway Practice. NCHRP Synthesis 360. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

Deere, D. U., Hendron, A. J., Jr., Patton, F. D., and Cording, E. J. 1967. Design of Surface and Near Surface Construction in Rock. in Failure and Breakage of Rock, C. Fairhurst, Ed. Society of Mining Engineers of AIME, New York: 237 – 302.

Deere, D. U., Deere, D. W. 1988. The Rock Quality Designation (RQD) Index in Practice, Rock Classification System for Engineering Purpose. ASTM STP 984, Louis Kirkaldie, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia: 91-101.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2004. Code of Practice for Foundation. Buildings Department, Hong Kong.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2006. Foundation Design and Construction. Geo-Publication No.1/2006, Civil Engineering and Development Department, Hong Kong.

Buildings Ordinance Office (BOO). 1980. Pile Foundations -Practical Note for Authorised Persons and Registered Structural Engineers, No. 66, 1997 Revision, Buildings Department, Hong Kong.

CGS. 1985. Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. 2nd ed. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Toronto, Ont.

Vipulanandan, C., Hussain, A., and Usluogulari, O. 2007. Parametric Study of Open Core-Hole on the Behavior of Drilled Shafts Socketed in Soft Rock. In Contemporary Issues in Deep Foundations: Proceedings of Geo-Denver 2007, Denver, Colo., 18–21 February 2007. Geotechnical Special Publication No. 158. [CDROM]. Edited by W. Camp, R. Castelli, D.F. Laefer, and S. Paikowsky. American Society for Civil Engineers, Reston:1–10.

AASHTO. 1996. Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. 16th ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.

Zhang, L. 2010. Prediction of End-Bearing Capacity of Rock Socketed Shafts Considering Rock Quality Designation (RQD). Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 47.

Zhang, L. 2004. Drilled Shafts in Rock – Analysis and Design. A.A. Balkema Publishers, London.

Zhang, L. 2005. Engineering Properties of Rocks. Vol. 4. Elsevier Geo-Engineering Book Series. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Zhang, L. 2008. Predicting the End Bearing Capacity of Rock Socketed Shafts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual and 11th International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations, New York, 15–17 October 2008. Deep Foundations Institute, Hawthorne, N.J: 307–316.

Zhang, L., and Einstein, H.H. 1998. End Bearing Resistance of Drilled Shafts in Rock. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 124(7): 574–584

Downloads

Published

2016-08-30

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

ROCK BEARING RESISTANCE OF BORED PILES SOCKETED INTO ROCK. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 78(8-6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9638