# ANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES OF THE FRICTIONAL PRESSURE DROP PREDICTION USING DIFFERENT DATA SOURCE

## DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9665## Keywords:

Two-phase flow, friction factor, pressure drop, Genetic Algorithm## Abstract

Predictions of the frictional pressure drop using friction factor correlations that have been developed based on past experimental data have always been found to disagree with recent experimental data. Thus, new correlations are continuously being developed to generalize their applications across refrigerants and flow regimes. The friction factor is dependent on the Reynolds number and relative roughness, therefore consequently depends on the applied equation and fluid data. This research shows the outcome of the analysis of the frictional pressure drop prediction when different data source as well as different friction factor equations for smooth and rough pipes are utilized. The R-22 data used for comparison are experimental data from a past report, NIST (Standard Reference Database), and experimental data from University of Indonesia. The used e friction factor equations are Blasius and Fang *et al*. (2011) in smooth and rough pipe respectively. The mass flux is ranging from 200 to 600 kg/m^{2}s and vapor quality from 0.0001 to 0.5, the latter of which is assumed constant along the pipe length of 2000 mm at the saturation temperature of 10Â°C. The pipe material is stainless steel with an absolute roughness of 0.03 mm. The minimization of the friction factor and two-phase flow frictional pressure drop is achieved by applying Genetic Algorithm (GA). The comparisons reveal that the differences are an indication of the appropriate data source necessary so that the frictional pressure drop can be accurately predicted. The results showed that in 1.5 mm pipe diameter, the Blasius equation gives the lower percentage of differences in the range of 0.69 â€“ 1.47 % when the data from NIST and UI are used. While the lower percentage of differences gives Fang *et al*. (2011) equation in the range of 1.47 â€“ 2.61% when data from Pamitran *et al*. (2010) and UI are used. In the 3 mm inner diameter, also Blasius equation gives the lower percentage of differences in the range of 0.89 â€“ 2.52% when the data from Pamitran *et al*. (2010) and UI are used. While Fang *et al*. (2011) gives the lower percentage of differences in the range of 1.56 â€“ 1.33% when the data from Pamitran *et al*. (2010) and UI are used. The proposed method is predictable to raise the accuracy of the prediction and decrease the time of testing. The results are compared between each otherâ€™s for different data sources. For most situations, the percentage difference, as well as for laminar and turbulent flows are between 91 â€“ 97% and 88 â€“ 95% in 1.5 and 3 mm pipe diameter respectively.

## References

Ould Didi, M. B., Kattan, N. and Thome, J. R. 2002. Prediction of Two-Phase Pressure Gradients of Refrigerants in Horizontal Tubes. International Journal of Refrigeration. 25: 935-947.

White, F. M. 2005. Viscous Fluid Flow. 3rd Edition. McGraw â€“ Hill Book Co, USA.

Swamee, P. K. and Jain, A. K. 1976. Explicit Equations for Pipe Flow Problems. Journal of the Hydraulics Division â€“ ASCE. 102(5): 657-664.

Colebrook, C. F. 1939. Turbulent Flow in Pipes with Particular Reference to the Transition Region Between Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws. Journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers (London). 11(4): 133-156.

Wesseling, J. and Homma, F. 1967. Hydraulic Resistance of Drain Pipes. Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 15, 183 â€“ 197.

Zagarola, M. V. 1998. Mean-Flow Scaling of Turbulent Pipe Flow. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, USA.

Mustafa, A., Oguz, E. T., and Mustafa, T. C. 2014. A Review of Non-Iterative Friction Factor Correlations for the Calculation of Pressure Drop in Pipes. Bitlis Eren Univ. J. Sci. & Technol. 4 (1): 1-8.

Yu, Xu, Xiande, Fang, Guohua, Li, and Dingkun, Li. 2014. An Experimental Investigation of Flow Boiling Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of R134a in a Horizontal 2.168 mm Tube Under Hypergravity. Part I: Frictional Pressure Drop. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 75: 769-779.

GeniÄ‡, S., ArandjeloviÄ‡, I., KolendiÄ‡, P., JsriÄ‡, M. and Budimir, N. 2011. A Review of Explicit Approximations of Colebrookâ€™s Equation. FME Trans. 39: 67-71.

Zigrang, D. J. and Sylvester, N. D. 1982. Explicit Approximations to the Colebrookâ€™s Friction Factor. AICHE Journal. 28: 514-515.

Samadianfard, S. 2012. Gene Expression Programming Analysis of Implicit Colebrook-White Equation in Turbulent Flow Friction Factor Calculation. Journal of Petrol Sci. Eng. 92: 48-55.

Yu, Xu, Xiande, Fang, Xianghui, Su, Zhanru, Zhou and Weiwei, Chen. 2012. Evaluation of Frictional Pressure Drop Correlations for Two-Phase Flow in Pipes. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 253: 86-97.

Fang, X. D., Xu, Y. and Zhou, Z. R. 2011. New Correlations of Single-Phase Friction Factor for Turbulent Pipe Flow and Evaluation of Existing Single-Phase Friction Factor Correlations. Nucl. Eng. Des. 241: 897-902.

Incropera, F. P., DeWitt, D. P. 2001. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Winning, H. K. and Coole, T. 2013. Explicit Friction Factor Accuracy and Computational Efficiency for Turbulent Flow in Pipes. Flow Turbulence Combust. 90: 1-27.

Gosselin, L., Tye-Gingras, M., Mathieu-Potvin, F. 2009. Review of Utilization of Genetic Algorithms in Heat Transfer Problems. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 52: 2169-2188.

Matheus, P., Porto, Hugo, T. C., Pedro, Luiz, Machado, Ricardo, N. N., Koury, Carlos, U. S., Lima, Carlos and F. M., Coimbra. 2014. Genetic Optimization of Heat Transfer Correlations for Evaporator Tube Flows. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 70: 330-339.

Brown, G. 2002. The history of the Darcy-Weisbsch Equation for Pipe Flow Resistance. Environmental and Water Resources History. 38(7): 34-43.

Moody, L. F. and Princeton, N. J. 1944. Friction Factors for Pipe Flow. Transactions of the ASME. 66(8): 671-684.

Son, C. H. and Park, S. -J. 2006. An Experimental Study on Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics of Carbon Dioxide During Gas Cooling Process in a Horizontal Tube. Int. J. Refrig. 29: 539-546.

Blasius, H. 1913. The Law of Similarity in Friction Processes in Liquids. Communications on Research in the Areas of Engineering. 131. VDI-Verlag Berlin.

McAdams, W. H., Woods, W. K. and Heroman, L. C. 1942. Vaporization inside Horizontal Tubes. II â€“ Benzene â€“ Oil Mixtures. Trans. ASME. 64(3):193-200.

Pamitran, A. S., Choi, K. I., Oh, J. T. and Hrnjak, P. 2010. Characteristics of Two-Phase Flow Pattern Transitions and Pressure Drop of Five Refrigerants in Horizontal Circular Small Tubes. Int. J. Refrigeration. 33: 578-588.

NIST. 2015. NIST Chemistry Web book, http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/, accessed 2015-05-12.

Laboratory Data for R22, University of Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, taken February 2015.

Cho, J. M. and Kim, M. S. 2007. Experimental Studies on the Evaporative Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of CO2 in Smooth and Micro-Fin Tubes of the Diameters of 5 and 9.52 mm. Int. J. Refrigeration. 30: 986-994.

Park, C. Y. and Hrnjak, P. S. 2007. CO2 and R410A Flow Boiling Heat Transfer, Pressure Drop, and Flow Pattern at Low Temperatures in a Horizontal Smooth Tube. Int. J. Refrigeration. 30: 166-178.

Oh, H. K., Ku, H. G., Roh, G. S., Son, C. H. and Park, S. J. 2008. Flow Boiling Heat Transfer Characteristics of Carbon Dioxide in a Horizontal Tube. Appl. Therm. Eng. 28: 1022-1030.

Zhao, Y., Molki, M., Ohadi, M. M. and Dessiatoun, S. V. 2000. Flow Boiling of CO2 in Micro-Channels. ASHRAE Trans. 437-445. DA- 00-2-1.

Kaisa, M. M. 1998. Nonlinear Multi-objective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Bostonm Massachusetts.

Corne, D. W., Knowles, J. D. and Oates, M. J. 2000. The Pareto Envelope-Based Selection Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization. In M. Schoenauer et al., editors, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VI). 839-848. Berlin, Springer.

Abdullah, K., David W. C. and Alice, E. S. 2006. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms: A Tutorial. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 91: 992-1007.

MATLAB R2014a version (8, 3.0, 532) 64 bit (win64), license number 271828.

## Downloads

## Published

## Issue

## Section

## License

Copyright of articles that appear in *Jurnal Teknologi* belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.

## How to Cite

*Jurnal Teknologi*,

*78*(10-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9665