THE COMPARISON OF EMPIRICAL FORMULA TO PREDICT THE INCIPIENT MOTION OF WEAK COHESIVE SEDIMENT MIXTURE

Authors

  • Mojtaba Porhemmat Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Chuah Run En Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Juliana Abd Jalil Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9704

Keywords:

Incipient of motion, sand-silt mixture, cohesive sediment.

Abstract

Available incipient sediment motion models were mostly developed based on homogeneous non-cohesive sediment. In non-homogeneous sediment mixture, particularly with fraction of cohesive particles might have an effect on the values of incipient sediment motion using the available models. In this study the effects of weak cohesive material on the incipient motion of sand-silt mixture were investigated in laboratory and compared with different existing formulas. Fine sand with median grain size of d50=153 µm was used whilst the cohesive material is kaolinite-silt with d50=28 µm. The sand-silt mixtures were prepared with sand percentage (Sa)/Silt percentage (Si) distributions ranging from 100Sa/0Si to 0Sa/100Si. The condition for incipient sediment motion was defined in categories number 4 (i.e. frequent particle movement at nearly all locations) and number 6 (i.e. permanent particle movement at all locations) of 7 categories introduced by the Delft Hydraulic. Values of critical Shields parameter were monotonously increased as the percentage of silt increased but reached a relatively constant value as the silt percentage reached 50%. Comparing the data for the particular sediment range used in this study proved that the Brownlie, Van Rijn and Miedema relationships are capable to calculate the Shields parameter within the range of category 4 and 6

References

Vanoni, V. A. 1975. Sedimentation Engineering. ASCE, New York.

Shields, A. F. 1936. Application of Similarity Principles and Turbulence Research in Bed-Load Movement. US Dept of Agr. Soil Conservation Service Cooperative Library, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif.

Buffington, J. M. and Montgomery, D.R. 1977. A Systematic Analysis of Eight Decades of Incipient Motion Studies, with Special Reference to Gravel-Bedded Rivers. Water Res. 33(8): 1993–2029.

Ye, Z. 2010. Erosion Threshold and Erosion Rate of Seabed Sediments. PhD thesis. The University of Western Australia, Aust.

Wan Mohtar H. 2011. The Interaction between Oscillating-Grid Turbulence and a Sediment Layer. PhD thesis. The University of Nottingham, UK.

Debnath K. 2012. Local Scour around Non-Circular Piers in Clay-Sand Mixed Cohesive Sediment Beds. Engineering Geology. 151: 1-14.

Kramer, H. 1935. Sand Mixtures and Sand Movement in Fluvial Models. Trans. ASCE. 100(1): 798–878.

Yang C. T. 2006. Erosion and Sedimentation Manual. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Colorado, USA. Chap I, 1-5.

Gilbert, K.G. 1914. The Transportation of Debris by Running Waters, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 86.

Cassie, H.J. 1935. Uber Gesclziehebewegung, Preuss. Versuchsanst Fur Wasserbau Und Schifibau,Berlin, Mitt., vol. 19 (translation on file at the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C.).

Wang Y. C. 2013. Effects of Physical Properties and Rheological Characteristics on Critical Shear Stress of Fine Sediments. PhD thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.

Sanford, L. P. 2008. Modelling a Dynamically Varying Mixed Sediment Bed with Erosion, Deposition, Bioturbation, Consolidation, and Armouring. Computer & Geoscience. 34(10): 1263-1283.

Miedema, S. A. 2008. An Analytical Method to Determine Scour. WEDA XXVIII & Texas A&M. 39(1): 8–11.

Miedema, S. A. 2010. Constructing the Shields Curve, a New Theoretical Approach and its Applications. WODCON XIX, Beijing China. (September).

Brownlie, W. R. 1982. Prediction of Flow Depth and Sediment Discharge in Open Channels. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, USA.

Soulsby, R., & Whitehouse, R. 1997. Threshold of Sediment Motion in Coastal Environments. Pacific Coasts and Ports ’97: Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Coastal and Ocean Engineering Conference and the 6th Australasian Port and Harbour Conference. 1: 145-154.

Zanke, U. 2003. On The Influence of Turbulence on the Initiation of Sediment Motion. International Journal of Sediment Research. 18(1): 17–31.

Van Rijn, L. C. 1993. Principles of Fluid Flow and Surface Waves in Rivers, Estuaries, Seas and Oceans. Aqua Publication, (Edition).

Rouse, H. 1939. An Analysis of Sediment Transportation in the Light of Fluid Turbulence, Soil Conservation Service Report no. SCS-TP-25, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Mantz, P. A. 1977. Incipient Transport of Fine Grains and Flakes by Fluid-Extended Shields Diagram. Hydraulics division ASCE. 103(6): 601-615.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-28

How to Cite

THE COMPARISON OF EMPIRICAL FORMULA TO PREDICT THE INCIPIENT MOTION OF WEAK COHESIVE SEDIMENT MIXTURE. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(9-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9704