HANDLING EMERGENCE OF DYNAMIC VISUAL REPRESENTATION DESIGN FOR COMPLEX ACTIVITIES IN THE COLLABORATION

Authors

  • Suraya Ya’acob Institute of Visual Informatics, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
  • Nazlena Mohamad Ali Institute of Visual Informatics, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
  • Norshita Mat Nayan Institute of Visual Informatics, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9713

Keywords:

Visual design, visual representation, complex activities, collaboration, emergence, dynamic approach

Abstract

In recent years, we observed a general trend in organization toward emerging information items in the complex cognitive activities (CCA). Since CCA occur in decision making, problem solving and sense making more in the collaborative settings, it becomes essential for business to response and act according to emerging information items to stay relevant in the market. However, the emergence of information which has been known as an ‘uncontrollable entities’ are hard to be determined from information system perspectives. Thus, the management team is having difficulties in utilizing the emergence information to become valuable outcomes for both organization and stakeholders. This paper aims to show how visualization can play an important role to facilitate this challenge. First, we present the emergence challenges from the perspective of relative isolation between the information, mental and representation spaces. Then, we highlight the importance of dynamic concept as a fundamental approach to handle emergence. We attempt to pin the second order cybernetic as an underlying theory for dynamic interactivity between visual representation and users’ mental space. By having this, we are able to construct the information evolvement during the cognitive process and manage their cognitive burden. Finally, we report the findings from qualitative analysis of experimental case studies within a collaborative setting dealing with complex activities (decision making) process. Our findings show the positive outcomes to centralize collaborators’ mental model, bring clarities and foster innovative thinking during the process of complex activities in the collaboration. Through this research, we have found the potential of dynamic visual structure to bring better values, practical and sufficient in handling complexities of information emergence during the collaborative CCA in the organization. 

References

Kolfschoten, G. L., & Brazier, F. 2012. Cognitive Load in Collaboration- Convergence. 2012. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 129-138.

Hoque, F., & Baer, D. 2014. Everything Connects: How to Transform and Lead in the Age of Creativity, Innovation, and Sustainability: How to Transform and Lead in the Age of Creativity, Innovation and Sustainability. McGraw Hill Professional.

Isenberg, Petra, Niklas Elmqvist, J. S. 2011. Collaborative Visualization: Definition, Challenges, and Research Agenda. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. 10(4): 310-326.

Sedig K., & Parsons, P. 2013. Interaction Design for Complex Cognitive Activities with Visual Representations: A Pattern-Based Approach. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction. 5(2): 84-133.

Schneiderman, B. 1996. The Eyes Have It: A Task By Data Type Taxonomy For Information Visualizations. In Visual Languages, 1996. Proceedings. IEEE Symposium. 336-343.

Amar, R., & Stasko, J. 2004. A Knowledge Task-Based Framework For Design And Evaluation Of Information Visualizations. Information Visualization, 2004 (INFOVIS 2004) IEEE Symposium. 143-150.

Huang, W. 2014. Handbook of Human Centric Visualization. In Human Centric Visualizaton. Springer New York.

Burkhard R. A. & Eppler. M. J. 2004. Knowledge Visualization Towards a New Discipline and its Fields of Application. USI Research Note (July).

Burkhard, R., A. 2005. Knowledge Visualization: The Use of Complementary Visual Representations for the Transfer of Knowledge: a Model, a Framework, and Four New Approaches. Doctoral dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology.

Bresciani, S., et al. 2008. A Collaborative Dimensions Framework : Understanding the Mediating Role of Conceptual Visualizations in Collaborative Knowledge Work. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1-10.

Bertschi, S., & Bresciani, S. 2011. What Is Knowledge Visualization? Perspectives On An Emerging Discipline. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on International Conference of Information Visualization. 329-336.

Masud L., et al. 2010. From Data To Knowledge-Visualizations As Transformation Processes Within The Data-Information-Knowledge Continuum. In IEEE Information Visualisation (IV), 2010 14th International Conference. 445-449.

Meyer, R. 2009. Knowledge Visualization. In Media Informatics Advanced Seminar on Information Visualization.

Sedig, K., Parsons, P., & Babanski, A. 2012. Towards a Characterization of Interactivity in Visual Analytics. Journal of Multimedia Processing and Technologies. 3(1): 12-28.

Thomas, J. J., and Cook, K. A. 2005. Illuminating the Path: the Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. Los Amitos, CA: IEEE Comput. Soc.

Bates, M. J. 2005. Information And Knowledge: An Evolutionary Framework For Information Science. Information Research. 10(4).

Johnson, J. 2010. Embracing Design In Complexity. In T. Z. (Eds) Katerina Alexiou, Jeffrey Johnson (Ed.). Embracing Complexity in Design. 193-203.

Hodgson, A. 2009. Decision Integrity and Second Order Cybernetics. Cybernetics and Systems Theory in Management: Tools, Views, and Advancements. 52.

Briggs, R. O., Kolfschoten, G., Vreede, G. J. D., Albrecht, C., Dean, D. R., & Lukosch, S. 2009. A Seven-Layer Model Of Collaboration: Separation Of Concerns For Designers Of Collaboration Systems. ICIS 2009 Proceedings. 26.

Goswami, B. 2004. The Human Fabric: Unleashing the Power of Core Energy in Everyone. Aviri Publishing.

Mengis, J., & Eppler, M. J. 2008. Understanding And Managing Conversations From A Knowledge Perspective: An Analysis Of The Roles And Rules Of Face-To-Face Conversations In Organizations. Organization Studies. 29(10): 1287-1313.

Yaacob, S., Ali, N. M., & Nayan, N. M. 2013. Understanding Big Picture and Its Challenges: Experts and Decision Makers Perspectives. In Advances in Visual Informatics. Springer International Publishing. 311-322.

Senge, P. & Jaworski, J. 2011. Synchronicity: The Inner Path Of Leadership. Berrett-Koehler Publisher.

Eppler M. J., Hoffmann, F., & Bresciani, S. 2011. New Business Models Through Collaborative Idea Generation. International Journal of Innovation Management. 15(6): 1323-1341.

Albers, M. J. 2004. Analysis for Complex Information : Focus on User Goals, Information Needs, and Information Relationships. Coping with complexity. University of Bath, London.

Sedig, K., Parsons, P., Dittmer, M., & Haworth, R. 2014. Human-Centered Interactivity of Visualization Tools : Micro- and Macro-level Considerations. (W. Huang, Ed.) New York: Springer Science Business Media. 717-743.

Hundhausen, C. D. 2014. Evaluating Visualization Environments: Cognitive, Social, and Cultural Perspectives. In Handbook of Human Centric Visualization. Springer New York. 115-145.

Hundhausen, C. D. 2004. Using End User Visualization Environments to Mediate Conversations : A Communicative Dimensions. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing. 16(3): 158-185.

Bresciani, S., Blackwell, A. F., & Eppler, M. 2008. A Collaborative Dimensions Framework : Understanding the Mediating Role of Conceptual Visualizations in Collaborative Knowledge Work. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1-10.

Eppler, M. J. 2006. Knowledge Integration in Face-to-Face Communication and the Moderating Effect of a Collaborative Visualization Tool (August). 1-93.

Flensburg, P. 2009. An Enhanced Communication Model. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research. 9(15): 31-43.

Eppler, M. J., & Bresciani, S. 2013. Visualization In Management: From Communication To Collaboration. A Response To Zhang. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing. 24(2): 146-149.

Adnan, W. A. W., Daud, N. G. N., & Noor, N. L. M. 2008. Expressive Information Visualization Taxonomy For Decision Support Environment. Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, 2008. ICCIT'08. Third International Conference. 1: 88-93.

Ziemkiewicz, C. 2010. Understanding The Structure Of Information Visualization Through Visual Metaphors (phD dissertation). University of North Carolina, Charlotte.

Liu, Z., Nersessian, N., & Stasko, J. 2008. Distributed Cognition As A Theoretical Framework For Information Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 14(6): 1173-80.

Liu, Z., & Stasko, J. 2010. Mental Models, Visual Reasoning And Interaction In Information Visualization: A Top-Down Perspective. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions. 16(6): 999-1008.

Mengis, J. 2007. Integrating Knowledge Through Communication: An Analysis Of Expert-Decision Maker Interactions. Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Corporate Communication.

Vitiello, P. F., & Kalawsky, R. S. 2012. Visual Analytics: A Sensemaking Framework For Systems Thinking In Systems Engineering. In Systems Conference (SysCon), IEEE International. 1-6.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. 2003. Cognitive Load Theory And Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist. 38(1): 1-4.

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. 2004. Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications Of The Interaction Between Information Structures And Cognitive Architecture. Instructional Science. 32(1/2): 1-8.

Tergan, S., Tanja, K., & Mitchell, J. C. 2005. Knowledge and Information Visualization: Searching for Synergies (LNCS 3426.). Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Yin, K. 2010. Qualitative Research From Start To Finish. Guilford Press.

Craft, B., & Cairns, P. 2005. Beyond Guidelines: What Can We Learn From The Visual Information Seeking Mantra? In Information Visualisation, 2005. Proceedings. Ninth International Conference on IEEE. 44-50.

Dickie, M. 2000. Experimenting On Classroom Experiments: Do They Increase Learning In Introductory Microeconomics. University of Southern Mississippi Working Paper.

Lengler, R., & Eppler, M. J. 2007. Towards A Periodic Table of Visualization Methods for Management. In M. Alam (Ed.), GVE ’07 Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Graphics and Visualization in Engineering. 83-88.

Keeley, L., Walters, H., Pikkel, R., & Quinn, B2013. Ten Types Of Innovation: The Discipline Of Building Breakthroughs. John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-28

How to Cite

HANDLING EMERGENCE OF DYNAMIC VISUAL REPRESENTATION DESIGN FOR COMPLEX ACTIVITIES IN THE COLLABORATION. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(9-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9713