INFORMATION EXCHANGES OF SOCIAL MEDIA EVANGELISTS DURING FLOOD: A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9718Keywords:
Disaster, social network analysis, social media, information disseminationAbstract
Information dissemination during disaster is very crucial, but inherits several complexities associated with the dynamic characteristics of the disaster. Social media evangelists (activists) play an important role in disseminating critical updates at on-site locations. However, there is limited understanding on the network structure formed and its evolution and the types of information shared. To address these questions, this study employs Social Network Analysis technique on a dataset containing 157 social media posts from an influential civilian fan page during Malaysia’s flood. The finding demonstrates three different network structures emerged during the flood period. The network structure evolves depending on the current state of the flood, the amount of information available and the need of information. Through content analysis, there were seven types of information exchanges discovered. These information exchanges evolved as the scale and magnitude of flood changes. In conclusion, this study shows the emergence of different network structures, density and identification of influential information brokers among civilians that use social media during disaster. Despite the low number of influential information brokers, they successfully manage their specific cluster in conveying information about the disaster and most importantly coordinating the rescue mission.
References
L. J. Chen, C. W. Li, Y. Te Huang, and C. S. Shih. 2011. A Rapid Method for Detecting GeographicallyDisconnected Areas after Disasters. IEEE Int. Conf. Technol. Homel. Secur. 501-506.
G. Post Magazine. 2015. Malaysia Flood Damage To Cost $560m,†[Online]. Available: http://www.postonline.co.uk/post/news/2389886/malaysia-flood-damage-to-cost-usd560m. [Accessed: 24-Feb-2015].
M. Mirbabaie, C. Ehnis, S. Stieglitz, and D. Bunker. 2014. Communication Roles in Public Events – A Case Study on Twitter Communication. 207-218,
A. Guille. 2013. Information Diffusion In Online Social Networks. Proc. 2013 Sigmod/PODS Ph.D. Symp. PhD Symp. 31-36.
R. Ahmad and A. T. Olanrewaju. 2015. Civilians Heroes: A Social Network Analysis Of Information Structure On Social Media During Disaster. International Conference on Computing and Informatics.
A. Guille, H. Hacid, C. Favre, and D. a Zighed. 2013. Information Diffusion in Online Social Networks: A Survey. SIGMOD Rec. 42(2): 17-28.
A. Hughes and L. Palen. 2012. The Evolving Role of the Public Information Officer: An Examination of Social Media in Emergency Management. J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 9.
K. Starbird, L. Palen, A. L. Hughes, and S. Vieweg. 2010. Chatter on The Red: What Hazards Thret Reveals about the Social Life of Microblogges Information. Proc. Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work. 241-250.
S. Bunce, H. Partridge, and K. Davis. 2011. Exploring Information Experience Using Social Media During The 2011 Queensland Floods : A Pilot Study. Aust. Libr. J. 61: 34-45.
S. Denef, S. Augustin, P. S. Bayerl, and N. Kaptein. 2013. Social Media and the Police — Tweeting Practices of British Police Forces during the August 2011 Riots. Chi 2013. August 2011: 1-10.
L. A. St. Denis, A. L. Hughes, and L. Palen. 2012. Trial by Fire : The Deployment of Trusted Digital Volunteers in the 2011 Shadow Lake Fire. Iscram. April: 1-10.
A. L. Hughes, L. A. St. Denis, L. Palen, and K. M. Anderson. 2014. Online Public Communications By Police & Fire Services During The 2012 Hurricane Sandy. Proc. 32nd Annu. ACM Conf. Hum. factors Comput. Syst. - CHI ’14. 1505-1514.
M. S. Belblidia. 2010. Building Community Resilience Through Social Networking Sites. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Cris. Response Manag. 2(March): 24-36.
F. Gideon. 2010. The Transformative Power of Social Media on Emergency and Crisis Management. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Cris. Response Manag. 2(1): 1-10.
L. Hjorth and K. -h. Y. Kim. 2011. The Mourning After: A Case Study of Social Media in the 3.11 Earthquake Disaster in Japan. Telev. New Media. 12: 552-559.
Z. Yandong. 2010. Social Networks And Reduction Of Risk In Disasters : An Example Of Wenchuan Earthquake. Int. Conf. Econ. Stress. Hum. Cap. Fam. Asia. 1-13.
N. Akhtar, H. Javed, and G. Sengar. 2013. Analysis of Facebook Social Network. 2013 5th Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Commun. Networks. 451-454.
A. R. Kelly and M. K. Autry. 2011. A Humanistic Approach to the Study of Social Media : & Case Study Research. SIGDOC’11. 257-260.
D. L. Hansen, B. Shneiderman, and M. A. Smith. 2011. Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Elsevier Inc.
M. a. Smith. 2013. NodeXL: Simple Network Analysis For Social Media. 2013 Int. Conf. Collab. Technol. Syst. 89-93.
D. L. Hansen, D. Rotman, E. Bonsignore, N. Milic-Frayling, E. M. Rodrigues, M. Smith, and B. Shneiderman. 2013. Do You Know The Way To SNA’: A Process Model For Analyzing And Visualizing Social Media Network Data. Proc. 2012 ASE Int. Conf. Soc. Informatics, Soc. 2012. 304-313.
K. Wakita and T. Tsurumi. 2001. Finding Community Structure In Mega-Scale Social Networks. The 16th International Conference On World Wide Web, 2007. 1275-1276.
K. Higuchi, “Kh coder,†[Online]. Available: http://khc.sourceforge.net/en/.
M. A. Smith. 2014. Identifying And Shifting Social Media Network Patterns With Nodexl. 2014 Int. Conf. Collab. Technol. Syst. 3-8, May.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
