IRIS RECOGNITION BASED ON THE MODIFIED CHAN-VESE ACTIVE CONTOUR

Authors

  • Shahrizan Jamaludin Centre for Computer Engineering Studies, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nasharuddin Zainal Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • W Mimi Diyana W Zaki Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9756

Keywords:

Iris recognition, Chan-Vese active contour, execution time, recognition accuracy

Abstract

Over recent years, iris recognition has been an explosive growth of interest in human identification due to its high accuracy. Iris recognition is a biometric system that uses iris to verify and identify human identity. Iris has pattern that is rich with textures and can be compared among humans. There are many methods can be used in iris recognition. The methods based on the integro-differential operator and Hough transform are the most widely used in iris recognition. Unfortunately, both methods require more time to execute and has less accurate recognition accuracy due to the eyelid occlusion. In order to solve these problems, the Chan-Vese active contour is modified to reduce the execution time and to increase the recognition accuracy of iris recognition. Then, this method is compared with the integro-differential operator method. The iris images from CASIA-v4 database are used for the experiments. According to the results, the proposed method recorded 0.91 s for execution time which was 61.28 % faster than the integro-differential operator method. The proposed method also achieved 0.9831 for area under curve (AUC) which was 2.66 % higher recognition accuracy than the integro-differential operator method. To conclude, the modified Chan-Vese active contour was able to improve the performance of iris recognition compared to the integro-differential operator method. 

References

Muron, A., and Pospisil, J. 2000. The Human Iris Structure and its Usages. Acta. Univ. Palacki. Olomuc. Fac. Rerum. Nat. Phys. 39: 87–95.

Kaur, N., and Juneja, M. 2014. A Review on Iris Recognition. IEEE Recent Advances in Engineering and Computational Sciences. 1-5.

von Seelen, U. 2004. IrisCode Template Compression and its Effects on Authentication Performance. Biometrics Consortium Conference. 1-18.

Jeong, D. S., Hwang, J. W., Kang, B. J., Park, K. R., Won, C. S., Park, D. K., and Kim, J. 2010. A New Iris Segmentation Method for Non-Ideal Iris Images. Image and Vision Computing. 28(2): 254-260.

Flom, L., and Safir, A. 1987. Iris Recognition System. U.S. Patent No. 4,641,349.

Misztal, K., Saeed, E., Tabor, J., and Saeed, K. 2012. Iris Pattern Recognition with a New Mathematical Model to its Rotation Detection. Biometrics and Kansei Engineering. New York: Springer.

Shin, K. Y., Nam, G. P., Jeong, D. S., Cho, D. H., Kang, B. J., Park, K. R., and Kim, J. 2012. New Iris Recognition Method for Noisy Iris Images. Pattern Recognition Letters. 33(8): 991-999.

Wayman, J. 2014. Book Review: Handbook of Iris Recognition. IET Biometrics. 3(1): 41-43.

Daugman, J. 1994. Biometric Personal Identification System Based on Iris Analysis. U.S. Patent No. 5,291,560.

Daugman, J. 1993. High Confidence Visual Recognition of Persons by a Test of Statistical Independence. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 15(11): 1148-1161.

Radman, A., Jumari, K., and Zainal, N. 2013. Fast and Reliable Iris Segmentation Algorithm. IET Image Processing. 7(1): 42-49.

Wildes, R. P. 1997. Iris Recognition: An Emerging Biometric Technology. Proceedings of the IEEE. 85(9): 1348-1363.

Hilal, A., Daya, B., and Beauseroy, P. 2012. Hough Transform and Active Contour for Enhanced Iris Segmentation. International Journal of Computer Science Issues. 9(2): 1-10.

Radman, A., Jumari, K., and Zainal, N. 2011. Iris Segmentation: A Review and Research Issues. Software Engineering and Computer Systems. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg.

Kass, M., Witkin, A., and Terzopoulos, D. 1988. Snakes: Active Contour Models. International Journal of Computer Vision. 1(4): 321-331.

Chan, T. F., and Vese, L. 2001. Active Contours without Edges. IEEE Transactions on Image processing. 10(2): 266-277.

Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., and Sapiro, G. 1997. Geodesic Active Contours. International Journal of Computer Vision. 22(1): 61-79.

Mumford, D., and Shah, J. 1989. Optimal Approximations by Piecewise Smooth Functions and Associated Variational Problems. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. 42(5): 577-685.

Osher, S., and Sethian, J. A. 1988. Fronts Propagating with Curvature Dependent Speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi Formulations. Journal of Computational Physics. 79(1): 12–49.

Chinese Academy of Sciences' Institute of Automation. CASIA Iris Image Database. [Online]. From: http://biometrics.idealtest.org/. [Accessed on 28 June 2014].

Masek, L. 2003. Recognition of Human Iris Patterns for Biometric Identification. Doctoral dissertation, Master’s thesis. University of Western Australia.

Daugman, J. 1985. Uncertainty Relation For Resolution In Space, Spatial Frequency, And Orientation Optimized By Two-Dimensional Visual Cortical Filters. JOSA A. 2(7): 1160-1169

Downloads

Published

2016-10-05

How to Cite

IRIS RECOGNITION BASED ON THE MODIFIED CHAN-VESE ACTIVE CONTOUR. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(10-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9756