MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PALM KERNEL SHELL CONCRETE IN COMPARISON WITH PERIWINKLE SHELL CONCRETE

Authors

  • Uchechi G. Eziefula School of Engineering Technology, Imo State Polytechnic, Umuagwo, Imo State, Nigeria
  • Hyginus E. Opara Department of Civil Engineering, Imo State University, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria
  • Collins U. Anya artment of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15585

Keywords:

Coarse aggregate, lightweight aggregate concrete, mechanical properties, palm kernel shell, periwinkle shell

Abstract

Comparative analysis of mechanical properties of palm kernel shell concrete with periwinkle shell concrete is presented in the paper. The binder and fine aggregate were Ordinary Portland cement and river sand, respectively, while potable water was used for mixing and curing. The constituent materials were batched by weight. Concrete mix ratio was 1:2:4 and water/cement ratio was 0.5. Three groups of concrete mixes containing different coarse aggregates were tested: 100% palm kernel shells, 100% periwinkle shells, and 100% granite as control. Tests were carried out for bulk density and compressive strength of the concrete cubes at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days curing, respectively. The results revealed that for all curing ages, palm kernel shell concrete had lower bulk density and lower compressive strength than periwinkle shell concrete. The bulk density and compressive strength of the 28-day palm kernel shell concrete were 1840 kg/m3 and 14.02 N/mm2, respectively, those of periwinkle shell concrete were 1936 kg/m3 and 16.90 N/mm2, while those of granite concrete were 2496 kg/m3 and 25.95 N/mm2, respectively. Both palm kernel shell concrete and periwinkle shell concrete satisfied the bulk density and compressive strength requirements for lightweight aggregate concrete.

References

ACI 213R-03 (2003). Guide for Structural Lightweight-Aggregate Concrete, American Concrete Institute, ACI Committee 213, Farmington Hills, MI.

Adaba, C.S., Agunwamba, J.C., Nwoji, C.U., Onya, O.E., and Ozeh, S. (2012). Comparative Cost and Strength Analysis of Cement and Aggregate Replacement Materials. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 31(2): 111-115.

Adewuyi, A.P., and Adegoke, T. (2008). Exploratory Study of Periwinkle Shells as Coarse Aggregates in Concrete Works. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(6): 1-5.

Agbede, O.I., and Manasseh, J. (2009). Suitability of Periwinkle Shell as Partial Replacement for River Gravel in Concrete. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies, 15: 59-66.

Alengaram, U.J., Jumaat, M.Z., and Mahmud, H. (2008). Ductility Behaviour of Reinforced Palm Kernel Shell Concrete Beams. European Journal of Scientific Research, 23(3): 406-420.

Alengaram, U.J., Mahmud, H., and Jumaat, M.Z. (2010). Comparison of Mechanical and Bond properties of Oil Palm Kernel Shell Concrete with Normal Weight Concrete. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5(8): 1231-1239.

Aslam, M., Shafigh, P., Jumaat, M.Z., and Lachemi, M. (2016). Benefits of Using Blended Waste Coarse Lightweight Aggregates in Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production, 119: 108-117.

ASTM C 330-04 (2004). Standard Specification for Lightweight Aggregates for Structural Concrete. American Society for Testing and Materials.

BS 410-1 (2000). Test Sieves: Technical Requirements and Testing – Part 1: Test Sieves of Metal Wire Cloth. London: British Standards Institution.

BS 1881-102 (1983). Testing Concrete – Part 102: Method for Determination of Slump. London: British Standards Institution.

BS 1881-114 (1983). Testing Concrete – Part 114: Methods for Determination of Density of Hardened Concrete. London: British Standards Institution.

BS 1881-116 (1983). Testing Concrete – Part 116: Method for Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes. London: British Standards Institution.

BS 3148 (1980). Methods of Test for Water for Making Concrete (Including Notes on the Suitability of the Water). London: British Standards Institution.

BS 8110-1 (1997). Structural Use of Concrete – Part 1: Code of Practice for Design and Construction. London: British Standards Institution.

Common Periwinkle (n.d.). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_periwinkle (Accessed 11 October, 2016).

Dhir, R.K., and Jackson, N. (1996) Concrete. In Jackson N. and R.K. Dhir (eds.) Civil Engineering Materials (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave, 161-298.

Ettu, L.O., Ibearugbulem, O.M., Ezeh, J.C., and Anya, U.C. (2013). A Reinvestigation of the Prospects of Using Periwinkle Shell as Partial Replacement for Granite in Concrete. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 2(3): 54-59.

Falade, F., Ikponmwosa, E.E., and Ojediran, N.I. (2010). Behavior of Lightweight Concrete Containing Periwinkle Shells at Elevated Temperature. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 5(4): 379-390.

Foong, K.Y., Alengaram, U.J., Jumaat, M.Z., and Mo, K.H. (2015). Enhancement of the Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Oil Palm Shell Concrete Using Rice Husk Ash and Manufactured Sand. Journal of Zhejiang University – SCIENCE A (Applied Physics and Engineering), 16(1): 59-69.

Global Palm Oil Production 2015 (n.d.). http://www.slideshare.net/GreenPalmOil/2015-global-palm-oil-production-by-country (Accessed 01 October, 2016).

Hassoun, M.N., and Al-Manaseer, A. (2008). Structural Concrete: Theory and Design (4th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Ibearugbulem, O.M., Ajoku, C.A., and Iwuoha, S.E. (2016). Model for the Prediction of Flexural Strengths of Sand Stone-Periwinkle Shell Concrete. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 5(2): 148-156.

Islam, M.S., and Ghafoori, N. (2013). Evaluation of Alkali-Silica Reactivity Using Aggregate Geology, Expansion Limits of Mortar Bars and Concrete Prisms, and Kinetic Model. Journal of Materials Science Research, 2(2): 103-117.

McKinlay, D.G. (1996) Soils. In Jackson N. and R.K. Dhir (eds.) Civil Engineering Materials (5th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave, 349-447.

Mo, K.H., Alengaram, U.J., and Jumaat, M.Z. (2015a). Experimental Investigation on the Properties of Lightweight Concrete Containing Waste Oil Palm Shell Aggregate. Procedia Engineering, 125: 587-593.

Mo, K.H., Alengaram, U.J., Visintin, P., Goh, S.H., and Jumaat, M.Z. (2015b). Influence of Lightweight Aggregate on the Bond Properties of Concrete with Various Strength Grades. Construction and Building Materials, 84: 377-386.

Mo, K.H., Alengaram, U.J., Jumaat, M.Z., Yap, S.P. and Lee, S.C. (2016). Green Concrete Partially Comprised of Farming Waste Residues: A Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 117: 122-138.

Neville, A.M., and Brooks, J.J. (2010). Concrete Technology (2nd ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.

NIS 444-1 (2003). Quality Standard for Ordinary Portland Cement – Part 1: Composition, Specification and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. Lagos: Standards Organization of Nigeria.

Ohimain, E.I., Bassey, S., and Bawo, D.D.S. (2009). Uses of Sea Shells for Civil Construction Works in Coastal Bayelsa State, Nigeria: A Waste Management Perspective. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(9): 1025-1031.

Olusola, K.O., and Babafemi, A.J. (2013). Effect of Coarse Aggregate Sizes and Replacement Levels on the Strength of Palm Kernel Shell (PKS) Concrete. Civil Engineering Dimension, 15(1): 43-50.

Osadebe, N.N., and Ibearugbulem, O.M. (2009). Application of Scheffe’s Simplex Model in Optimizing Compressive Strength of Periwinkle Shell Granite Concrete. The Heartland Engineer, 4(1): 27-38.

Osarenmwinda, J.O., and Awaro, A.O. (2009). The Potential Use of Periwinkle Shell as Coarse Aggregate for Concrete. Advanced Materials Research, 62/63/64: 39-43.

Osei, D.Y. (2014). Experimental Investigation on Recycled Plastics as Aggregate in Concrete. International Journal of Structural and Civil Engineering Research, 3(2): 168-174.

Osei, D.Y., and Jackson, E.N. (2012). Experimental Study on Palm Kernel Shells as Coarse Aggregates in Concrete. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 3(8): 1-6.

Prusty, J.K., and Patro, S.K. (2015). Properties of Fresh and Hardened Concrete Using Agro-Waste As Partial Replacement of Coarse Aggregate – A Review. Construction and Building Materials, 82: 101-113.

Shetty, M.S. (2012). Concrete Technology: Theory and Practice (6th revised ed.). New Delhi: S. Chand.

Soneye, T., Ede, A.N., Bamigboye, G.O., and Olukanni, D.O. (2016). The Study of Periwinkle Shells as Fine and Coarse Aggregate in Concrete Works. 3rd International Conference on African Development Issues, 361-364. ISSN: 2449-075X. http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/6719/1/icadi16pp361-364.pdf (Accessed 05 October, 2016)

Yew, M.K., Mahmud, H.B., Ang, B.C., and Yew, M.C. (2014). Effects of Heat Treatment on Oil Palm Shell Coarse Aggregates for High Strength Lightweight Concrete. Materials and Design, 54: 702-707.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF PALM KERNEL SHELL CONCRETE IN COMPARISON WITH PERIWINKLE SHELL CONCRETE. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15585