MONITORING CORROSION OF REINFORCEMENT BAR USING CAPACITIVE SENSOR AT DIFFERENT CONCRETE COVER DEPTH

Authors

  • Siti Fatimah Abdul Rahman Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Ismail Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Bala Muhammad Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Norhazilan Md Noor Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hazri Bakhtiar Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v23.15814

Keywords:

Reinforcement corrosion, Capacitor sensor, Concrete cover, Corrosion potential (Ecorr).

Abstract

Corrosion of reinforcement is a worldwide problem that affects durability and integrity of reinforced concrete structures. Repairing deteriorated reinforced concrete structures at an advanced stage is very costly and time consuming. It is more advantageous if corrosion can be detected at an earlier stage so that some preventive measures can be carried out. Monitoring of reinforcement corrosion in concrete can be achieved by embedding corrosion sensor within the concrete cover. In this study, an Embedded Capacitor Sensor (ECS) was developed to evaluate corrosion activity in concrete specimen. ECS was embedded in the concrete and its function is to measure the corrosion potential (Ecorr) of reinforcement. Ecorr measured by ECS is a result of the accumulated positive and negative charges between the two ECS plates from the corrosion process. For actual testing, ECS was tied to the reinforcement and embedded in concrete specimens. It was then calibrated using standard portable sensor (Ag/AgCl reference electrode) by measuring Ecorr. The ECS measurement is proven reliable because the reading pattern was similar to what shown by standard portable sensor. For monitoring, the ECS also was tied to the reinforcement and embedded in concrete at two different depths (15 mm and 25 mm). The concrete specimens were contaminated with 5% NaCl by weight of cement and then immersed in 3.5% NaCl solutions at room temperature to speed up the corrosion process. From this research, it was found that Ecorr for 15 mm concrete cover is higher than 25 mm concrete cover. Thicker cover delay the penetration chloride ion and oxygen to the reinforcement. Eventually, the bars were found corroded from the broken specimens that confirmed the detection of corrosion activities as recorded by the sensors.

References

American Society for Testing and Materials. (1991). Standard Test Method for Half-Cell Potentials of Uncoated Reinforcing Steel in Concrete. ASTM C876.

British Standards Institute, 1997. BS 5328-2:1997, Methods for specifying concrete mixes.

British Standards Institute,1996. Specification for Portland Cement. BS 12: 1989

Broomfield, J.P, Davies K., Hladky K., 2002. The use of permanent corrosion monitoring in new and existing reinforced concrete structure. Cement & Concrete Composite. 27-34

Broomfield, JP. (1997). Corrosion of Steel in Concrete: Understanding, Investigation and Repair. London.: E& FN SPON.

Chindaprasirt, P., Rukzon, S. and Sirivivatnanon, V. (2008). Resistance to Chloride Penetration of Blended Portland Cement Mortar Containing Palm Oil Fuel Ash, Rice Husk and Fly

Ash. Construction and Building Materials.22: 932-938.

Ervin, B.L., Kuchma, D.A., Bernhard, J.T. and Reis, H. (2009). Monitoring Corrosion of Rebar Embedded in Mortar using High-Frequency guided Ultrasonic Waves. Journal of Engineering Mechanics © ASCE. 135(1): 0733-9399.

Güneyisi, E., Özturan,T. and Gesoğlu, M. A Study on Reinforcement Corrosion and Related Properties of Plain and Blended Cement Concrete Under Different Curing Conditions.

Cement and Concrete Composites. 27: 449-461.

Hussain, S.E. and Rasheeduzzafar. (1994). Corrosion Resistance Performance of Fly Ash Blended Cement Concrete. ACI Materials Journal. 91-M25

Ismail, M., Hamzah, E., Goh C.G. and Rahman, I.A. (2009). Corrosion Performance of DualPhase Steel Embedded in Concrete. The Arabian for Science and Engineering. 35(2B).

Legat, A., Leban, M. and Bajt, Z. (2004). Corrosion Processes of Steel in Concrete Characterized by Means of Electrochemical Noise. Electrochemical Acta. 49:2741-2751.

Mangat, P.S. and Molloy, B.T. (1991). Influence of PFA, SLAG and Microsilica on Chloride Induced Corrosion of Reinforcement in Concrete. Cement and Concrete Research. 21: 819-834.

Portable Rebar Corrosion Meter SRI-CMIII Operation Manual, 2007. Shikoku Research Institute INC.

Selvaraj,R.,Selvaraj,M. and Iyer, S.V.K.(2009). Studies on the Evaluation of the Performance of Organic Coatings Used for the Prevention of Corrosion of Steel Rebars in Concrete Structures. Progress in Organic Coatings. 64:454-459.

Thomas, M.D.A. and Matthews, J.D. (2004). Performance of PFA Concreet in a Marine Environment-10 Year Results. Cement and Concrete Composites. 26:5-20.

Tittarelli, F. and Moriconi, G. (2011). Comparison between Surface and Bulk Hydrophobic Treatment against Corrosion of Galvanized Reinforcing Steel in Concrete. Concrete and Cement Research. 41: 609-614.

Veleva, L., Mario, A., Aviles, A. Melissa, K., David, O. and Wipf. (2000). Comparative Cyclic Voltammetry and Surface Analysis of Passive Films Grown on Stainless Steel 316 in

Concrete Pore Model Solutions. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry. 537: 85-93.

Yoo J.H., Park Z.T., Kim J.G. and Chung, L. (2003). Development of a Galvanic Sensor System for Detecting the Corrosion Damage of the Steel Embedded in Concrete Structure: Part 1. Laboratory Tests to Correlate Galvanic Current with Actual Damage. Cement and Concrete Research. 33: 2057-2062.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MONITORING CORROSION OF REINFORCEMENT BAR USING CAPACITIVE SENSOR AT DIFFERENT CONCRETE COVER DEPTH. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v23.15814