GAP-ACCEPTANCE BEHAVIOR AT UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v27.15910Keywords:
Gap acceptance, critical gap, critical lag, traffic flow, logit model, uncontrolled intersectionAbstract
Left-turn gap acceptance at an uncontrolled intersection is dependent on many factors. Most existing studies evaluate gap acceptance in developed countries and less deal with developing countries. Morover, most existing studies also do not differentiate between gap and lag when evaluating gap acceptance. In this paper, a binary logit left-turn gap acceptance model is developed using 1496 field observations in Egypt as one of the developing countries. Gap acceptance behavior was found to be influenced by the type of gap presented to the driver (gap or lag). Size of time interval, driver's time-to-turn, and oncoming driver yielding behavior were found to be the potential influencing factors. Equations for estimating the critical gap and lag were developed and applied for different scenarios. Critical gap and lag were found to be varying over a wide range of. These values were less than those of developed countries which confirms the more risky behavior of drivers in developing countries. The findings from this study can improve operational analysis of left turns at unsignalized intersections by using different critical gaps for different traffic and geometric conditions.References
AASHTO (2001). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. Washington, D.C.
Cassidy, M., Madanat, S. M., Wang, M. H., and Yang, F. (1995). Unsignalized intersection capacity and level of service: revisiting critical gap. Transportation Research Record, 1484, 16–22.
Daganzo, C. F. (1981). Estimation of gap acceptance within and across the population from direct roadside observation. Transportation Research, Part B, 15, 1-15.
Devarasetty, P. M., Zhang, Y. and Fitzpatrick, K. (2012). Differentiating between left-turn gap and lag acceptance at unsignalized intersections as a function of the site characteristics.
Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 138, 580-588.
Fitpatrick, K. (1991). Gaps accepted at stop controlled intersections. Transportation Research
Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.,
Gattis, J. L. and Low, S. T. (1998). Gap acceptance at nonstandard stop-controlled intersections. Mack-Blackwell National Rural Transportation Study Center, University of Arkansas.
Gattis, J. L. and Low, S. T. (1999). Gap acceptance at a typical stop-controlled intersections.
Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125(3), 201- 207.
Greenshields, B., Schapiro, D., and Ericksen, E. (1947). Traffic performance at urban street intersections, Yale Bureau of Highway Traffic.
Hamed, M. M. and Easa, S. (1997). Disaggregate gap-acceptance model for unsignalized Tintersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 123(1).
Harwood, D. W., Mason, J. M., and Brydia, R. E. (2000). Sight distance for stop-controlled
intersections based on gap acceptance. Transportation Research Record 1701, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 32–41.
HCM (2000). Highway Capacity Manual. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board.
Lassarre, S., Lejeune, P., and Decret, J. C. (1991). Gap acceptance and risk analysis at
unsignalized intersections. Intersections without traffic signals II, Proceeding of the International Workshop, Bochum, Germany, 258–269.
Mason, J. M., Fitzpatrick, K., and Hardwood, D.W. (1990). Field observations of truck operational characteristics related to intersection sight distance. Transportation Research
Record 1280, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 163-172.
Maze, T. H. (1981). A probabilistic model of gap acceptance behavior. Transportation Research Record, 795, 8–13.
Meneguzzer, C., Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., and Gecchele, G. (2010). Comparative evaluation of Logit and Fuzzy Logic models of gap-acceptance behavior. Proceedings of the TRISTAN
VII, Seventh Triennial Symposium on Transportation Analysis, Tromsoe, Norway, 649–652.
Pant, P. D. and Balakrishnan, P. (1994). Neural network for gap acceptance at stop-controlled intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120(3), 432-446.
Pollatschek, M. A., Polus, A., and Livneh. M. (2002). A decision model for gap acceptance and capacity at intersections. Transport Research, 36(B), 649–663.
Raff, M., and Hart, J. W. (1950). A volume warrant for urban stop signs Eno Found for Hwy. Traffic control, Saugatuck, Connecticut.
Ragland, D. R., Arroyo, S., Shladover, S. E., Misener, J. A., and Chan, C. Y. (2006). Gap acceptance for vehicles turning left across on-coming traffic: implications for intersection
decision support design. Research report, Safe Transportation Research & Education Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., Gecchele, G., and Meneguzzer, C. (2010). Transferability of fuzzy models of gap-acceptance behavior. Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, 96,
Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 379–390.
Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., and Gecchele, G. (2011). Development of gap acceptance fuzzy models using data from driving simulator experiments. Proceedings of the ICVRAM 2011 and
ISUMA2011 Conferences, Hyattsville, Maryland, 138–146.
Rossi, R., Gastaldi, M., Gecchele, G., and Meneguzzer, C. (2012). Comparative analysis of random utility models and fuzzy logic models for representing gap-acceptance behavior using data from driving simulator experiments. Proc., 15th meeting of the EURO Working Group on Transportation, Padova, Italy.
Rossi, R., Meneguzzer, C., and Gastaldi, M. (2013). Transfer and updating of Logit models of gap-acceptance and their operational implications. Transport Research, part C, 28, 142–
Teply, S., Abou-Henaidy, M. I., and Hunt, J. D. (1997). Gap acceptance behavior: aggregate and Logit perspectives: Part 1. Traffic Engineering and Control, 38(9), 474-482.
Teply, S., Abou-Henaidy, M. I., and Hunt, J. D. (1997). Gap acceptance behavior: aggregate and Logit perspectives: Part 2. Traffic Engineering and Control, 38(10), 540-544.
Yan, X., and Radwan, E. (2008). Influence of restricted sight distances on permitted left-turn operation at signalized intersections. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 134.
Zhody, I., Sadek, S., and Rakha, H. A. (2010). Empirical analysis of effects of wait time and rain intensity on driver left-turn gap acceptance behavior. Transportation Research Record,
, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–10.