SAFETY CLIMATE AMONG CONTRACTORS’ ORGANIZATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v27.15961Keywords:
rahimfka@gmail.comAbstract
Understanding the safety climate of the contractor‟s organization with regard to safety and risk in the workplace will provide an overview of the current safety culture of that organization. The perceptions and attitudes of the workforce are the important factors in assessing the safety needs in order to facilitate workplace safety improvement. Safety performance may fail if the organization does not take into account these current attitudes and perceptions. The aim of this study is to examine the factors and assessment of safety climate in the contractors‟ organizations. This study is carried out through questionnaire survey to gauge employee attitudes and perceptions using several attitudes dimensions. The full employee attitude survey questionnaire was divided into two sections which consists of 49 statements. The responses of this study were quite encouraging with 60% participants responded. However, only 38 valid sets of questionnaires were subjected to analysis. The findings indicated that there were many factors and indicators of safety climate that had been found from the literature review. In fact, the numbers of factors required in the safety climate measurements, or which factors were the most effective were always subjected to argument. From the review of safety climate factors, the most frequently measured dimensions were related to management, safety systems and risk, followed by work pressure, competence and rules or procedures. On the assessment of the contractors‟ safety climate, the total average scores for all dimensions were in levels of satisfaction with a score ranging from 6.48 to 8.04. Also, all the safety climate dimensions showed scores in the satisfactory values with a score above six (6) for the system interfaces of the contractor organizations using the safety climate matrix. Hence, the contractor‟s organizations surveyed had the positive safety climate toward safety in their workplace.References
Abdul-mohsen Al-Hammad and Sadi Assaf (1996). Assessment of Work Performance of
Maintenance Contractors in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Management in Engineering, 12,
(1996); doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:2(44) .
Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, Bachan Singh, Wan Zulkifli Wan Yusof and Andrain King Tzee
Yang (2004). Integration of Safety, Health, Environment and Quality (SHEQ) Management
System in Construction: A Review. Jurnal Kejuruteraan Awam (now MJCE), 16(1): 24-37.
Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, Muhd Zaimi Abd Majid, Bachan Singh. (2008a) An Overview of
Construction Accident in Malaysia (book chapter: Issues in Construction Industry). ISBN
-983-52-0568-2. Pp: 110.
Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, Muhd Zaimi Abd Majid and Bachan Singh. (2008b) Causes of
Accident at Construction Sites, Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering (MJCE), Vol 20, No
, pp 242-259.
Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid, Khairulzan Yahya and Lim Wei Han. (2010) Management
Competencies for Preventing and Reducing Stress at Construction Site. Built Environment
Journal (UiTM), Vol. 7, No. 2, 32-37, 2010, ISSN 1675-5022.
Andrew R. Wills, Barry Watson and Herbert C. Biggs (2006). Comparing safety climate factors
as predictors of work-related driving behavior. Journal of Safety Research, 37 (2006) 375–
Che Hassan, C.R., Basha, O.J. and Wan Hanafi, W.H. (2007) Perception of building construction
workers towards safety, health and environment. Journal of Engineering Science and
Technology, Vol. 2, No. 3 (2007) 271 – 279.
Cooper, M. D. (2000) Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36, 111-136.
Cox, S.J. and Cheyne, A.J.T. (2000). Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. Safety
Science. vol.34, no. 1-3, p111-129.
Faridah Ismail, Ahmad Ezanee Hashim, Razidah Ismail and Muhd. Zaimi Abdul Majid (2009).
The Operationalisation of Safety Culture for the Malaysian Construction Organisations.
International Journal of Business and Management, Vol 4 No. 9 (Sept 2009) Pp. 226 – 237.
Faridah Ismail, Norizan Ahmad, Nurul Afida Isnaini Janipha and Razidah Ismail (2012).
Assessing the Behavioural Factors‟ of Safety Culture for the Malaysian Construction
Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36 ( 2012 ) 573 – 582.
Flin, R., Mearns, K., O'Connor, P., and Bryden, R., (2000). Measuring safety climate: Identifying
the common features. Safety Science, 34, 177-192.
Fiona Davies, Rachel Spencer and Karen Dooley., (2001) Summary guide to safety climate tools,
Offshore Technology Report 1999/063, HSE books, ISBN 0 7176 1958 3
Gadd, S. and Collins, A.M. (2002) Safety Culture: a review of the literature Health & Safety
Laboratory HSL/2002/25.
Gil Luria and Dana Yagil (2010). Safety perception referents of permanent and temporary
employees: Safety climate boundaries in the industrial workplace. Accident Analysis and
Prevention, 42 (2010) 1423–1430.
Guldenmund, F., (2000). The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety
Science, 34 (1-3), 215-257.
Griffin, M. A., and Neal, A. (2000) Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety
climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health
Psychology, 5,347-358.
Health & Safety Executive (HSE). (2005) A review of safety culture and safety climate literature
for the development of the safety culture inspection toolkit, Research report 367, HSE Books,
ISBN 0 7176 6144 X
HSC (1993). ACSNI Study Group on Human Factors. 3rd Report: Organising for Safety. London:
HMSO.
Jeremy M. Beus, Mindy E. Bergman and Stephanie C. Payne (2010). The influence of
organizational tenure on safety climate strength: A first look. Accident Analysis and
Prevention 42 (2010) 1431–1437.
Kathryn Mearns, Lorraine Hope, Michael T. Ford and Lois E. Tetrick (2010). Investment in
workforce health: Exploring the implications for workforce safety climate and commitment.
Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 (2010) 1445–1454.
Nor Azimah Chew Abdullah, Jeffery T. Spickett, Krassi B. Rumchev, and Satvinder S. Dhaliwal
(2009). Validity and Reliability of The Safety Climate Measurement in Malaysia.
International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 5 No. 3 April 2009 Pp. 111-141.
Oi-ling Siu. (2004). Safety climate and safety performance among construction workers in Hong
Kong: The role of psychological strains as mediators. Accident Analysis & Prevention,
Volume 36, Issue 3, May 2004, Pages 359-366.
Robert R. Sinclair, James E. Martin, Lindsay E. Sears (2010). Labor unions and safety climate:
Perceived union safety values and retail employee safety outcomes. Accident Analysis and
Prevention 42 (2010) 1477–1487.
Siti Fatimah Bahari and Sharon Clarke (2013). Cross-validation of an employee safety climate
model in Malaysia. Journal of Safety Research, 45 (2013) 1– 6.
Tahira M. Probst and Armando X. Estrada (2010). Accident under-reporting among employees:
Testing the moderating influence of psychological safety climate and supervisor enforcement
of safety practices. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42 (2010) 1438–1444.
Williamson, A., Feyer, A., Cairns, D. and Biancotti, D., (1997). The development of a measure
of safety climate: the role of safety perceptions and attitudes. Safety Science, 25, 15-27.
Yueng-Hsiang Huanga, Michael Hob, Gordon S. Smith and Peter Y. Chen (2006). Safety climate
and self-reported injury: Assessing the mediating role of employee safety control. Accident
Analysis and Prevention 38 (2006) 425–433.
Yueng-Hsiang Huang, Jiu-Chiuan Chen, Sarah DeArmond, Konstantin Cigularov and Peter Y.
Chen (2007). Roles of safety climate and shift work on perceived injury risk: A multi-level
analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 (2007) 1088–1096.
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 96-102.
Zohar, D. (2010). Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions.
Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 (2010) 1517–1522.