FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A FIXED OFFSHORE OTEC PLANT FOR COST-EFFECTIVE POWER GENERATION IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v36.22553Keywords:
Ocean Thermal Energy (OTEC), Offshore Structure, Marine Renewable Energy, Power Plant, Cost OptimisationAbstract
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) is a renewable energy technology that harnesses the temperature differential between warm surface water and cold deep ocean water to generate electricity and freshwater. Technological advancements have made OTEC increasingly viable, positioning it as a potential solution for sustainable energy generation in Malaysia. Despite its promise, OTEC development in Malaysia is challenged by the need for suitable sites and the high capital costs associated with traditional floating OTEC platforms. Additionally, efforts to attract anchor partners for OTEC projects have been met with limited success, slowing progress in implementation. This study assessed the feasibility of OTEC plant development in Malaysia through the analysis of sea temperature profiles, identifying five potential sites. A multi-criteria analysis was conducted considering factors such as cold water intake pipe length, proximity to power transmission lines, and environmental impact. The study also proposes a fixed offshore OTEC platform with a single-legged caisson structure, incorporating a braced substructure and dual-level production decks to optimize space for equipment and reduce CAPEX. Kuala Baram (Location C) was identified as the most favorable site due to its optimal conditions for cold water intake and proximity to transmission infrastructure. The proposed fixed platform design offers significant CAPEX reductions compared to floating alternatives, enhancing OTEC’s economic potential. The study’s findings support the immediate application of OTEC in Malaysia, particularly in ongoing projects off the coast of Sabah. Further research, including modeling and testing of the platform design, is necessary to advance commercialization and establish OTEC as a key component of Malaysia's renewable energy strategy.
References
Avery WH. and Wu C. 1994. Renewable Energy from the Ocean - A guide to OTEC. Oxford University Press. New York, NY.
Banerjee S., Musa MN. and Jaafar AB. 2017. Economic Assessment and Prospect of Hydrogen Generated by OTEC as Future Fuel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 42(1): 26-37.
Cohen R. 1982. Energy from the Ocean. Phil. Transactions, Royal Society. London. A 307: 405-437.
Etemadi A., Emdadi A., Afshar OA. and Emami Y. 2011. Electricity Generation by the Ocean Thermal Energy. Energy Procedia. 12:936-943.
IRENA 2014, Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Technology Brief. IRENA Ocean Energy Technology Brief 1, The International Renewable Energy Agency, June 1-24.
Jaafar, A.B.; Abu Husain, M.K.; Ariffin, A. 2020, Research and Development Activities of Ocean Thermal Energy Driven Development in Malaysia, in Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) – Past, Present, and Progress, A.S. Kim, Ed.; 1–13. IntechOpen: London.
Jamaluddin, M. A., Liew, M. S. and John Kurian, V. (2014). Response of Monopod Platform Under Extreme Wave in Malaysian Water. In Applied Mechanics and Material. 567: 295-300.
Mohd Zaki, N. I., Abu Husain, M. K., Wang, Y., & Najafian, G. 2013. "Short-term Distribution of the Extreme Values of Offshore Structural Response by Modified Finite-Memory Nonlinear System Modeling," In 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2010. Technical Readiness of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC), National Ocean Service, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Coastal Response Research Center. TK1073 .T43 2010.
Paul Kish. 1980. The Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act of 1980. 11 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law. 192.
Pelc R. and Fujita RM. 2002. Renewable energy from the ocean. Marine Policy. 26: 471-479.
Pilotto, M., Ronalds, B.F. and Stocker, R., 2002. Dynamic Response of Shallow Water Monopod Platforms. Proceeding of OMAE’02 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering
Plocek TJ., Laboy M. and Marti JA. 2009. Ocean thermal energy conversion. Journal of petroleum Energy. 61: 65-66.
Uehara H. and Ikegami Y. 1990. Optimization of Closed-Cycle OTEC System. Trans of the ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. 112(4): 247-256.
Uehara H., Miyara A., Ikegami Y. and Nakaoka T. 1996. Performance Analysis of an OTEC Plant and a Desalination Plant Using an Integrated Hybrid Cycle. ASME. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 118(2): 115-122.
Vega LA. 2003. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Primer. Marine Technology Society Journal. 6(4): 25-35.
Vega LA. 1995. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion. In Encyclopedia of Energy Technology and the Environment. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mat Soom E, Abu Husain MK, Mohd Zaki NI, Mohd Nor MNK, Ayob MS, Najafian G. 2015. Global ultimate strength assessment (GUSA) for lifetime extension of ageing offshore structures. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth (2015) International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. 2015: 431–435.-Janua. [place unknown];
Mukhlas NA, Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Najafian G. 2018. Efficient derivation of extreme offshore structural response exposed to random wave loads. Ships and Offshore Structures. 13(7): 719–733.
Abu Husain, M.; Zaki, N.M.; Mallahzadeh, H.; Najafian, G. 2014, Short-term probability distribution of the extreme values of offshore structural response by an efficient time simulation technique. Ships and Offshore Structures. 11: 1–14.
Mohd Zaki, N.I.; Abu Husain, M.K.; Najafian, G. 2018, Extreme structural responses by nonlinear system identification for fixed offshore platforms. Ships and Offshore Structures. 13: 251–263.
Abu Husain MK, Mohd Zaki NI, Najafian G. 2019. Efficient time simulation method for predicting The 100-year extreme responses of an offshore platform. Ships and Offshore Structures.. 14(1): 401–409.
Azman NU, Husain MKA, Zaki NIM, Soom EM, Mukhlas NA, Ahmad SZAS. 2021. Structural integrity of fixed offshore platforms by incorporating wave-in-deck. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 9(9): 1027–1045.
Syed Ahmad SZA, Abu Husain MK, Mohd Zaki NI, Mukhlas NA, Mat Soom E, Azman NU, Najafian G. 2021. Offshore structural reliability assessment by probabilistic procedures—a review. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 9(9): 998–1023.
API. 2014. API recommended practice 2A-WSD planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms–working stress design. Washington: American Petroleum Institute.
Zhao Y, Dong S, Jiang F, Soares CG. 2020. System reliability analysis of an offshore jacket platform. Journal of Ocean University of China. 19(1): 47–59.
Jimenez-Martinez, M. 2020 Fatigue of Offshore Structures: A Review of Statistical Fatigue Damage Assessment for Stochastic Loadings. International Journal of Fatigue, 132: 105327.
Gaidai O, Wang F, Wu Y, Xing Y, Rivera MA, Wang J 2022 Ofshore renewable energy site correlated wind-wave statistics. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 68: 103207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103207.
Bai Y, Yan H, Cao Y, Kim Y, Yang Y, Jiang H. 2016. Timedependent reliability assessment of ofshore jacket platforms. Ships and Offshore Structures. 11(6):591–602.
Balakrishna R, Gaidai O, Wang F, Xing Y, Wang S 2022. A novel design approach for estimation of extreme load responses of a 10-MW floating semi-submersible type wind turbine. Ocean Engineering. 261: 112007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112007.
Low YM. 2016. A variance reduction technique for long-term fatigue analysis of offshore structures using Monte Carlo simulation. Engineering Structures. 128: 283-295128: 283–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.047.
Giraldo JSM, Videiro PM, de Sousa FJM, dos Santos C, Sagrilo LVS. 2019. Parametric interpolation method for probabilistic fatigue analysis of steel risers. Applied Ocean Research. 90: 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.023.
Gao Y, Low YM. 2016; An efficient importance sampling method for long-term fatigue assessment of deepwater risers with time domain analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 45: 102–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2016.04.003.
Umar S, Vafaei M, Alih SC. 2021. Sensor clustering-based approach for structural damage identification under ambient vibration. Automation in Construction. 121: 103433.
Auwalu, A.S.; Noor, N.; Shazwan, M.; Shah, A.; Umar, S.; Amran, M.; Adamu, M.; Vatin, N.I.; Fediuk, R. 2022. Performance of Steel-Bolt-Connected Industrialized Building System Frame Subjected to Hydrodynamic Force. Applied Sciences 12: 5093.
Samsó, R.; Crespin, J.; García-Olivares, A.; Solé, J. 2023, Examining the Potential of Marine Renewable Energy: A Net Energy Perspective. Sustainability.15: 8050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108050
Bhuiyan MA, Hu P, Khare V, et al., 2022. Economic feasibility of marine renewable energy: review. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9: 988513.
