ANALYSIS OF BUILDING DEFECTS AT RESIDENTIAL COLLEGES: A CASE STUDY AT HIGHER EDUCATION FACILITIES

Authors

  • Nur'afini Dzulkifli Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Noor Nabilah Sarbini Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Nur IzieAdiana Abidin Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Izni Syahrizal Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v12.18142

Keywords:

Complaints, Defects, Maintenance, Residential College

Abstract

Residential colleges are where students spend a significant amount of time at university. The university’s maintenance team must keep the building facilities in good condition to ensure the safety and comfort of the students and staff as well as to protect the university’s reputation. However, with today’s economic challenges, management frequently encounters difficulties in maintaining the buildings, resulting in the high number of complaints from building users. As a result, early detection of complaint trends is critical in reducing issues. Based on user complaints and the ‘learning from failure’ philosophy, the main aim of this study is to identify the most common complaint of building defects in residential colleges. The scope of the study is limited to 9 residential colleges from one (1) Malaysian public university. Complaints from 2012 to 2017 due to defects were categorized into 3 main areas of civil, electrical and mechanical. From here, the most frequent complaints from these categories were then identified. From the findings of this study, defects under civil received the highest number of complaints (62%), followed by defects under electrical (35%) and mechanical (3%). Under the category of civil, most defects were reported due to damage component, leaking and clogging. The solutions emphasize the importance of quality control, on improving workmanship, increasing building occupants’ awareness level, and improving complaints management. Overall, this study is significant when constructing new buildings because it provides information to the operation team as early as the design stage to consider the possibility of future maintenance activities, and planning improvement.

References

Wahida, R. N., Milton, G., Hamadan, N., Lah, N. M. I. B. N., and Mohammed, A. H. 2012. Building condition assessment imperative and process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 65: 775-780.

Pheng, L. S., and Wee, D. 2001. Improving maintenance and reducing building defects through ISO 9000. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering. 7(1): 6-24.

Schmitt, R., and Linder, A. 2013. Technical complaint management as a lever for product and process improvement. CIRP Annals. 62(1): 435-438.

Wahab, S. N. A., and Hamid, M. Y. 2011. A Review Factors Affecting Building Defects of Structural Steel Construction. Case Study: Student Accommodation in UiTM Perak. Procedia Engineering. 20: 174-179.

Chong, W.-K., and Low, S.-P. 2006. Latent building defects: causes and design strategies to prevent them. Journal of performance of constructed facilities. 20(3): 213-221.

Isa, H., Hassan, P., Takim, R., Mat, M., and Ithnin, Z. 2010. How adequate is adequate? A case of the adequacy in determining client requirements in the construction of four public hospitals in Malaysia. In W092-Special Track 18th CIB World Building Congress May 2010 Salford, United Kingdom. 248.

Faqih, F., Zayed, T., and Soliman, E., 2020. Factors and defects analysis of physical and environmental condition of buildings. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation. 5: 1-15.

Seeley, I. H. 1987. Building maintenance. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Douglas, J. 1996. Building performance and its relevance to facilities management. Facilities.

Chew, M. Defect analysis in wet areas of buildings. 2005. Construction and Building Materials. 19(3): 165-173.

Yacob, S., Ali, A. S., and Peng, A.-Y. C. 2016. Building condition assessment: Lesson learnt from pilot projects. In MATEC Web of Conferences. 66: 00072.

Lateef Olanrewaju, A., Idrus, A., and Faris Khamidi, M. 2011. Investigating building maintenance practices in Malaysia: a case study. Structural Survey. 29(5): 397-410.

Dzulkifli, N. a., Sarbini, N. N., Ibrahim, I. S., Abidin, N. I., Yahaya, F. M., and Azizan, N. Z. N., 2021. Review on maintenance issues toward building maintenance management best practices. Journal of Building Engineering. 44: 102985.

Isa, H. M., Ismail, K., Zainol, H., and Othman, M. F. 2016. Tracking architectural defects in university building in Malaysia. In MATEC Web Of Conferences. 66: 00017.

Bortolini, R., and Forcada, N. 2018. Building inspection system for evaluating the technical performance of existing buildings. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 32(5): 04018073.

Carretero-Ayuso, M. J., Moreno-Cansado A., and García-Sanz-Calcedo J. 2020. Occurrence of faults in water installations of residential buildings: An analysis based on user complaints. Journal of Building Engineering. 27: 100958.

Plebankiewicz, E. and Malara, J. 2020. Analysis of defects in residential buildings reported during the warranty period. Applied Sciences. 10(17): 6123.

Olanrewaju, A. L. and Abdul-Aziz, A.-R. 2015. Building maintenance processes, principles, procedures, practices and strategies. Building Maintenance Processes and Practices: Springer. 79-129.

Ali, A. S., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Sulaiman, R., and Peng Y. C. 2010. Factors affecting housing maintenance cost in Malaysia. Journal of facilities management.

Rosa, C., Silva, F., and Ferreira, L. P. 2017. Improving the quality and productivity of steel wire-rope assembly lines for the automotive industry. Procedia Manufacturing. 11: 1035-1042.

ISO 55000:2014 - Asset management, ISO, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/55088.html [Accessed: December 2021]

SIRIM QAS. ISO 9001 Quality Management System (QMS). https://www.sirim-qas.com.my/ [Accessed: December 2021].

Facility management- Management system- Requirements with guidance for use, ISO, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:41001:ed-1:v1:en, 2018, [Accessed: December 2021]

Agostinho, F., Silva, T. R., Almeida, C. M., Liu, G., and Giannetti, B. F. 2019. Sustainability assessment procedure for operations and production processes (SUAPRO). Science of the Total Environment. 685: 1006-1018.

Chanter, B. and Swallow, P. 2008. Building maintenance management. John Wiley & Sons.

Zawawi, E. M. A., Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Ali, A. S., and Sulaiman, R. 2010. Assessment of building maintenance management in Malaysia: Resolving using a solution diagram. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property. 9(4): 349-356.

Sani, S. I. A., Mohammed, A. H., Misnan, M. S., and Awang, M. 2012. Determinant factors in development of maintenance culture in managing public asset and facilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 65: 827-832.

Zulkarnain, S., Zawawi, E., Rahman, M., and Mustafa, N. 2011. A review of critical success factor in building maintenance management practice for university sector. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 5(3): 195-199.

Nguyen, T. A. and Chovichien, V. 2014. A practical list of criteria for evaluating construction project success in developing countries. ASEAN Engineering Journal. 3(2): 21-41.

Government of Western Australia. Inspection of buildings- guidelines for building complaint reports. https://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/publications/inspection-buildings-guidelines-building-complaint-reports [Accessed: December 2021].

Downloads

Published

2022-11-29

How to Cite

Dzulkifli, N., Sarbini, N. N., Abidin, N. I., & Ibrahim, I. S. (2022). ANALYSIS OF BUILDING DEFECTS AT RESIDENTIAL COLLEGES: A CASE STUDY AT HIGHER EDUCATION FACILITIES. ASEAN Engineering Journal, 12(4), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v12.18142

Issue

Section

Articles