MODELLING OF CO-AXIAL AND TRI-AXIAL MILLI-FLUIDIC DEVICES FOR CO-EXTRUSION OF SEMI-SOLID SOLIDS

Authors

  • Abdo Ali Al-Sharai Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Chin Fhong Soon Biosensor and Bioengineering Laboratory, Microelectronics and Nanotechnology-Shamsuddin Research Center, IIE, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Chan Hwang See School of Engineering & the Built Environment, Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom.
  • See Khee Yee Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
  • Kian Sek Tee Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
  • Mohammed Abdul Wahab Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.18953

Keywords:

Co-axial extruder, tri-axial extruder, milli-fluidics, laminar flow, micro-fluidic, computational fluid dynamic, COMSOL Multiphysics.

Abstract

With the use of a milli-fluidics device, it is possible to manipulate small amounts of fluid in the millimeter range with pinpoint accuracy. The milli-fluidics are currently lacking in studies of the relationship between fluid viscosity, output velocity and output pressure. Thus, this study examines the effects of viscosity on fluid dynamics in the co-axial and tri-axial milli-fluidics. This geometry of the co-axial and tri-axial milli-fluidics consist of single outlet, two inlets and three inlets, respectively. The tri-axial milli-fluidics is 46 mm long and 11.31 mm wide, while, the coaxial milli-fluidic is 64.73 mm long and 9.2 mm wide. The co-axial milli-fluidics constituted of 775 domain elements and 147 boundary elements, while, the tri-axial milli-fluidics mesh constituted of 1518 domain elements and 178 boundary elements.  Laminar flow was observed for the flow of the materials through the channels. When the dynamic viscosity approaches 5 mPa.s, the simulation reveals that the flow rate is inversely proportional to the dynamic viscosity for co-axial milli-fluidics. It was difficult to combine fluids with different viscosities with small volume of water in a narrow boundary, thus the parallel flow of material was observed. When using the one outlet channel for the tri-axial milli-fluidics, the assemble pressure at the three inlets was decreased compared with co-axial milli-fluidic. Even when the dynamic velocity of the fluid at outlet 1 increased, its velocity remained consistent. An extruder using tri-axial milli-fluidics can be used if the interfacial tension for intake 1 is higher than for inlet 2 and the dynamic viscosity of fluid 1 is above 2 mPas, according to the volumetric fraction model. The tri-axial milli-fluidic was found to be suitable for producing cladding of material with the balanced pressure from the two side channels.

References

Ayel, Vincent et al. 2021. “Flat Plate Pulsating Heat Pipes: A Review on the Thermohydraulic Principles, Thermal Performances and Open Issues.” Applied Thermal Engineering 197(May).

Beers, Kathryn L, João T Cabral, Howard J Walls, and Eric J Amis. 2004. “High Throughput Measurements of Polymer Fluids for Formulations* Kathryn L. Beers, João T. Cabral, Howard J. Walls and Eric J. Amis Polymers Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8542, USA.” 804: 1–8.

Chen, Kang Ping, and Di Shen. 2018. “Mechanism of Fluid Production from the Nanopores of Shale.” Mechanics Research Communications 88: 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.01.009.

Deng, Shuang et al. 2018. “Injectable in Situ Cross-Linking Hyaluronic Acid/Carboxymethyl Cellulose Based Hydrogels for Drug Release.” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition 29(13): 1643–55.

El-Mashad, Hamed M., Wilko K.P. Van Loon, Grietje Zeeman, and Gerard P.A. Bot. 2005. “Rheological Properties of Dairy Cattle Manure.” Bioresource Technology 96(5): 531–35.

Ertugrul, Ishak. 2020. “MODELING OF MICROFLUIDICS CHIP SYSTEMS WITH COMSOL Ishak ERTUGRUL 1.” (May): 28–30.

Freytes, V. M., M. Rosen, and A. D’Onofrio. 2018. “Capillary Film and Breakup Mechanism in the Squeezing to Dripping Transition Regime at the Mesoscale between Micro and Milli-Fluidics.” Chaos 28(10).

Horvath, A. Elisabet, and Tom Lindström. 2007. “The Influence of Colloidal Interactions on Fiber Network Strength.” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 309(2): 511–17.

Hulme, A. M. et al. 2021. “Scale-up of Reverse Electrodialysis for Energy Generation from High Concentration Salinity Gradients.” Journal of Membrane Science 627(January): 119245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119245.

Jougnot, Damien et al. 2018. “Impact of Small-Scale Saline Tracer Heterogeneity on Electrical Resistivity Monitoring in Fully and Partially Saturated Porous Media: Insights from Geoelectrical Milli-Fluidic Experiments.” Advances in Water Resources 113: 295–309.

El Kadi, Khadije, Fadi Alnaimat, and S. A. Sherif. 2021. “Recent Advances in Condensation Heat Transfer in Mini and Micro Channels: A Comprehensive Review.” Applied Thermal Engineering 197(August): 117412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117412.

Kadiak, Andrea, Andrea Laura Kadilak, and D Ph. 2017. “Advanced Manufacturing and Microenvironment Control for Bioengineering Complex Microbial Communities Advanced Manufacturing and Microenvironment Control for Bioengineering Complex Microbial Communities.”

Kumarasami, Ramdayalan et al. 2020. “IQPrep Kit: A Milli-Fluidic Test Kit for Immunodiagnostics.” IEEE Medical Measurements and Applications, MeMeA 2020 - Conference Proceedings.

Kurtoǧlu, Evrim et al. 2012. “Ferrofluid Actuation with Varying Magnetic Fields for Micropumping Applications.” Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 13(4): 683–94.

Lannes, Daniel Pontes, Antonio Lopes Gama, and Thiago Ferreira Bernardes Bento. 2018. “Measurement of Flow Rate Using Straight Pipes and Pipe Bends with Integrated Piezoelectric Sensors.” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 60: 208–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.03.001.

Malakootian, Mohammad, Alireza Nasiri, Ali Asadipour, and Elham Kargar. 2019. “Facile and Green Synthesis of ZnFe2O4@CMC as a New Magnetic Nanophotocatalyst for Ciprofloxacin Degradation from Aqueous Media.” Process Safety and Environmental Protection 129: 138–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.022.

Maximiano, Elizabete Maria et al. 2021. “Newly Designed Dual-Mode Electrochemical Sensor onto a Single Polydimethylsiloxane-Based Chip.” Talanta 221(August 2020).

Menkin, S., D. Golodnitsky, and E. Peled. 2009. “Artificial Solid-Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) for Improved Cycleability and Safety of Lithium-Ion Cells for EV Applications.” Electrochemistry Communications 11(9): 1789–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2009.07.019.

Patrick Ng, Abdo A A, et al. “The Effects of Changing Dynamic Viscosity of Fluid to Velocity , Pressure and Volume Fraction in Co-Axial And.”. 1–13.

Naher, S., D. Brabazon, and L. Looney. 2007. “Computational and Experimental Analysis of Particulate Distribution during Al-SiC MMC Fabrication.” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 38(3): 719–29.

Nilsson, Andreas, Filip Petersson, Henrik Jönsson, and Thomas Laurell. 2004. “Acoustic Control of Suspended Particles in Micro Fluidic Chips.” Lab on a Chip 4(2): 131–35.

Ren, Dajun et al. 2021. “Study on Remediation-Improvement of 2,4-Dichlorophenol Contaminated Soil by Organic Fertilizer Immobilized Laccase.” Soil and Sediment Contamination 30(2): 201–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2020.1828266.

KRISHNAMURTHY, P.G., 2013. “Scalable Continuous-Flow Processes for Manufacturing Plasmonic Nanomaterials a Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Engineering Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.” 2013.

Tesfai, Janet. 2011. “Continuous , Passive Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Emulsion Separation Within Microfluidic and Millifluidic Devices.”

Valitov, Gleb et al. 2020. “Effect of Acoustic Streaming on Continuous Flow Sonocrystallization in Millifluidic Channels.” Chemical Engineering Journal 379(July 2019): 122221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122221.

Wang, Can et al. 2015. “Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Planting Density on the Lignin Synthesis in the Culm in Relation to Lodging Resistance of Buckwheat.” Plant Production Science 18(2): 218–27.

Wehking, Jonathan D., Michael Gabany, Larry Chew, and Ranganathan Kumar. 2014. “Effects of Viscosity, Interfacial Tension, and Flow Geometry on Droplet Formation in a Microfluidic T-Junction.” Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 16(3): 441–53.

Yang, Jingxu et al. 2018. “Reactive Extrusion of Ammonium Polyphosphate in a Twin-Screw Extruder: Polydispersity Improvement.” Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification 133(June): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2018.09.019.

Yang, Lixia et al. 2017. “Local Investigations on the Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer around Taylor Bubbles Flowing in a Meandering Millimetric Square Channel.” Chemical Engineering Science 165: 192–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.03.007.

Zhen, H. S. et al. 2021. “A State-of-the-Art Review of Lab-Scale Inverse Diffusion Burners & Flames: From Laminar to Turbulent.” Fuel Processing Technology 222(May): 106940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106940.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MODELLING OF CO-AXIAL AND TRI-AXIAL MILLI-FLUIDIC DEVICES FOR CO-EXTRUSION OF SEMI-SOLID SOLIDS. (2023). ASEAN Engineering Journal, 13(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.18953