USABILITY WEBSITE EVALUATION FOR FRESH FOOD PRODUCT IN SME’S ONLINE BUSINESS WITH FUZZY AHP-TOPSIS INTEGRATION

Authors

  • Ilyas Masudin Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jalan Raya Tlogomas 246, Malang, 65144, East Java, Indonesia
  • Rahmad Wisnu Wardana Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jalan Raya Tlogomas 246, Malang, 65144, East Java, Indonesia
  • Mira Wahyu Tunjung Wijayanti Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jalan Raya Tlogomas 246, Malang, 65144, East Java, Indonesia
  • Dian Palupi Restuputri Industrial Engineering, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Jalan Raya Tlogomas 246, Malang, 65144, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.19159

Keywords:

Usability, Fuzzy AHP, TOPSIS, MCDM, E-commerce

Abstract

Service providers are increasingly competing to give the highest quality services to satisfy website users with the increased competition. Therefore, small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) should use technology in their product sales processes to become more competitive in the global market. This article will evaluate fresh food product e-commerce websites to see which one performs better in terms of usability. These parameters are investigated based on numerous research findings and the website attributes. To compare the outcomes, the evaluation was carried out using two alternative methods: fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Fuzzy AHP results and analysis were used to determine the weights of the main and sub-factors, while Fuzzy TOPSIS was used to determine the ranking of alternatives. A Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN) deals with poor assessments in biased judgments. The result from this study shows that the best website usability is website-1 because it closely follows crucial factors compared to the other two websites. The Website-3 comes in second, followed by the Website-2. Website-1 had the highest relative closeness score (0.5333), indicating that Website-1 has the best usability level among the three websites examined in this study. With a relative closeness of 0.5143, Website-3 came in second. Website-2 received the lowest score (0.5012), indicating that it has the least application of the critical success characteristics required for a fresh food product e-commerce website with the best usability level.  

References

Nagpal, R., Mehrotra, D., and Bhatia, P. K. 2016. Usability evaluation of website using combined weighted method: Fuzzy AHP and entropy approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering Management. 7(4): 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-016-0462-y

Nielsen, J., Molich, R., Snyder, C., and Farrell. S. 2000. E-commerce user experience Trust. Fremont. CA Nielsen Norman Group.

C Lien, C.-H., Wen, M.-J., Huang, L.-C., & Wu, K.-L. 2015. Online hotel booking: The effects of brand image, price, trust and value on purchase intentions. Asia Pacific Management Review. 20(4): 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.03.005

Lee, Y., & Kozar, K. A. 2012. Understanding of website usability: Specifying and measuring constructs and their relationships. Decision support systems. 52(2): 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.004

Adepoju, S. A., Oyefolahan, I. O., Abdullahi, M. B., & Mohammed, A. A. 2019. A survey of research trends on University Websites’ Usability Evaluation. Journal on Information Technology. 8(2): 11-19. https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.8.2.15714

Chang, E., & Dillon, T. S. 2006. A usability-evaluation metric based on a soft-computing approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 36(2): 356-372. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.851349

Alptekin, N., Hall, E. E., & Sevim, N. 2015. Evaluation of websites quality using fuzzy TOPSIS method. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 5(8): 221-242. http://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i8/1778

Masudin, I., & Saputro, T. E. 2016. Evaluation of B2C website based on the usability factors by using fuzzy AHP & hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 114 (1): 012091. http://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012091

Byun, D.-H., & Finnie, G. 2011. An AHP Method For Evaluating Usability Of Electronic Government Portals. Electronic Government, an International Journal. 8(4): 343-362. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2011.042811

Presley, A., & Fellows, P. 2013. An Analytic Hierarchy Process Model For Evaluating And Comparing Website Usability. International Journal of Business Information Systems. 12(2): 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2013.052047

Qi, S., Law, R., & Buhalis, D. 2017. Comparative Evaluation Study Of The Websites Of China-Based And International Luxury Hotels. Journal of China Tourism Research. 13(1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2017.128913

Shah, S., Solangi, Y., & Ikram, M. 2019. Analysis of barriers to the adoption of cleaner energy technologies in Pakistan using Modified Delphi and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Cleaner Production. 235: 1037-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.020

Xu, L., Shah, S. A. A., Zameer, H., & Solangi, Y. A. 2019. Evaluating renewable energy sources for implementing the hydrogen economy in Pakistan: a two-stage fuzzy MCDM approach. Environmental Science Pollution Research. 26(32): 33202-33215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06431-0

Van Laarhoven, P. J., & Pedrycz, W. 1983. A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory. Fuzzy Sets Systems. 11(1-3): 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7

Saaty, R.W., 1987. The Analytic Hierarchy Process—What It Is and How It Is Used. Mathematical modelling, 9(3-5): 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

Buckley, J.J., 1985. Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy sets and systems. 15(1): 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90013-2

Chen, C.T., 2000. Extensions Of The TOPSIS For Group Decision-Making Under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy sets and systems. 114(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01650114(97)00377-1

Lim, A.S., 2008. Inter-consortia battles in mobile payments standardisation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 7(2): 202-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.003

Chandramowleeswaran, G. and Uma, D.K., 2015. A Study on Customer Service Evaluation in Securing Customer Satisfaction. International Journal of Marketing and Human Resource Management. 6(3): 75-82.

Pavlou, P.A., 2003. Consumer Acceptance Of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust And Risk With The Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal Of Electronic Commerce. 7(3): 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275

Lang, A., Borse, J., Wise, K. and David, P., 2002. Captured By The World Wide Web: Orienting to Structural And Content Features Of Computer-Presented Information. Communication Research. 29(3): 215-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202029003001

Sundar, S.S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Xu, Q. and Jia, H., 2014. User Experience Of On-Screen Interaction Techniques: An Experimental Investigation Of Clicking, Sliding, Zooming, Hovering, Dragging, And Flipping. Human–Computer Interaction. 29(2): 109-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2013.789347

Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M. and Gurrea, R., 2006. The Role Played By Perceived Usability, Satisfaction And Consumer Trust On Website Loyalty. Information & Management. 43(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.002

Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P. and Peralta, M., 1999. Building Consumer Trust Online. Communications of the ACM. 42(4): 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1145/299157.299175

Al-Somali, S.A., Gholami, R. and Clegg, B., 2009. An Investigation Into The Acceptance Of Online Banking In Saudi Arabia. Technovation. 29(2): 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.004

Aleid, F., Rogerson, S. and Fairweather, B., 2009. Factors Affecting Consumers Adoption Of Ecommerce In Saudi Arabia From A Consumers’ Perspective. IADIS International Conference e-Commerce. 11-18. Algarve, Portugal.

Molla, A. and Licker, P.S., 2005. Ecommerce Adoption In Developing Countries: A Model And Instrument. Information & Management, 42(6): 877-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.09.002

[28] Al‐Ghaith, W., Sanzogni, L. and Sandhu, K., 2010. Factors Influencing The Adoption And Usage Of Online Services In Saudi Arabia. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. 40(1): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2010.tb00283.x

Mondego, D. and Gide, E., 2018. The Effect Of Trust On Mobile Payment Adoption: A Comprehensive Review Of Literature. International Journal of Arts & Sciences. 11(1): 375-389.

Ejdys, J., 2018. Building Technology Trust In ICT Application At A University. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 13(5): 980-997.

Lin, W.S., Cassaigne, N. and Huan, T.C., 2010. A Framework Of Online Shopping Support For Information Recommendations. Expert Systems with Applications. 37(10): 6874-6884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.034

Campbell-Grossman, C., Hudson, D.B., Hanna, K.M., Ramamurthy, B. and Sivadasan, V., 2018. Ease Of Use And Acceptability Of A Smartphone App For Young, Low-Income Mothers. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. 3: 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-017-0031-5

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30

How to Cite

Masudin, I., Wardana, R. W., Wijayanti, M. W. T. ., & Restuputri, D. P. (2023). USABILITY WEBSITE EVALUATION FOR FRESH FOOD PRODUCT IN SME’S ONLINE BUSINESS WITH FUZZY AHP-TOPSIS INTEGRATION. ASEAN Engineering Journal, 13(3), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.19159

Issue

Section

Articles