DEVELOPMENT OF PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION USING A NON-LINEAR APPROACH TO EVALUATE LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL IN SEI WAMPU BRIDGE, LANGKAT, NORTH SUMATRA, INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v14.20606Keywords:
Site response analysis, peak ground acceleration, liquefaction, liquefaction potential index, simplified procedure.Abstract
The design of building structures requires compliance with seismic codes and all their consequences. Based on geotechnical investigation reports, the construction of Sei Wampu Bridge in Langkat, North Sumatra, Indonesia, is located in an area where the soil layers are predominantly sand with shallow water levels because of its proximity to a river and is a high earthquake zone due to the Semangko fault. That condition will affect the potential of liquefaction occurring. This study aims to identify the liquefaction potential in the Sei Wampu Bridge. Based on Indonesian National Standard (SNI) 1726-2019, sites prone to liquefaction are categorized as site class-specific soil (F) and requires site-specific response analysis (SSRA) methods. Non-linear analysis 1-D is chosen to propagate earthquake waves with the software DEEPSOIL V7. The input parameter for soil movement utilizes an average spectral matching method with a minimum of 7 pairs of soil movement selected from the earthquake recording website, PEER Ground Motion Database. The selection of earthquake considers a 1000-year earthquake load return period, or a 7% probability exceeded within 75 years. Site-specific response analysis (SSRA) resulted in a peak ground acceleration (PGA) value for each borehole depth used in liquefaction potential analysis. Using a historical earthquake scenario with a 6.3 Mw shows that the research location has liquefaction potential at 0 m-15 m deep with high vulnerability levels, where the LPI value reaches 36.21.
References
Presidential Regulation Number 100 the Year 2014. 2014. Concerning the Acceleration of Toll Road Development in Sumatra. RI Cabinet Secretariat. Jakarta, Indonesia.
Askaviolita, I., S. Sito, and T.F. Fathani. 2022. Liquefaction Potential Index Analysis In Solo – Yogyakarta – Nyia Kulon Progo Toll Road (Section Karanganyar To Klaten Regency) At Central Java. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference On Earthquake Engineering And Disaster Mitigation 2022.
Pramaditya, A., and T.F. Fathani. 2021. Physical Modelling of Earthquake-induced Liquefaction on Uniform Soil Deposit and Earth Structures Settlement. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum. 85–96.
Das Braja, M., and G.V. Ramana. 2011. Principles of Soil Dynamics 2nd. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
Mase, L.Z., T.F. Fathani, and A.D. Adi. 2021. A Simple Shaking Table Test to Measure Liquefaction Potential of Prambanan Area, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. ASEAN Engineering Journal 11: 89–108. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v11.16874.
Youd, T.L. Liquefaction-Induced Damage to Bridges. Vol. 84602. Provo, Utah: Department of Civil Engineering, Brigham Young University.
Indonesian Standard Code. 2016. Procedures for planning bridges against earthquake loads (SNI 2833:2016. National Standardization Agency).
National Center for Earthquake Studies: Indonesian Seismic Sources and Seismic Hazard Maps, Center for Research and Development of Housing and Resettlement. 2017. Ministry of Public Works and Human Settlements.
Indonesian Standard Code. 2019. Earthquake Resistance Design for Buildings. (SNI 1726:2019. National Standardization Agency).
Sil, A., and J. Haloi. 2018. Site-Specific Ground Response Analysis of a Proposed Bridge Site over Barak River along Silchar Bypass Road, India. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 3: 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-018-0167-y.
Taghavinezhad, M., A.J. Choobbasti, and F. Farrokhzad. 2021. Effect of Liquefaction on Non-linear Seismic Response in Layered Soils: A Case Study of Babol, North of Iran. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 25: 2199–2216. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1623081.
Zheng, W., and L. Ronaldo. 2011. Non-linear Site Response and Liquefaction Analysis in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 29: 463–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-011-9396-y.
Youd, T.L., and B.L. Carter. Influence of Soil Softening and Liquefaction on Spectral Acceleration. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131: 811–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:7(811).
Hashash, Y.M.A., M.I. Musgrove, J.A. Harmon, O. Ilhan, G. Xing, O. Numanoglu, D. Groholski, C.A. Phillips, and D. Park. 2020. DEEPSOIL V7.0, User Manual. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Urbana, IL.
Sieh, K., and D. Natawidjaja. 2000. Neotectonics of the Sumatran fault, Indonesia. Journal of Geophysical Research 105: 28 295-28 326. doi:10.1029/2000JB900120.
McCaffrey, R. 2009. The Tectonic Framework of the Sumatran Subduction Zone. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 37: 345–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100212.
Naryanto, H.N. 1997. Kegempaan di Daerah Sumarta. Alami 2.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 2022.
Green, R.A., and J.J. Bommer. What Is the Smallest Earthquake Magnitude That Needs to Be Considered in Assessing Liquefaction Hazard? Earthquake Spectra 35: 1441–64. https://doi.org/10.1193/032218EQS064M.
Jalil, A., T.F. Fathani, I. Satyarno, and W. Wilopo. 2020. A Study on the Liquefaction Potential in Banda Aceh City after the 2004 Sumatra Earthquake. International Journal of GEOMATE 18: 147–155. https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.65.94557.
Ministry of Public Works and Housing. 2022. Earthquake Disaggregation Book 2022 For Planning and Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Infrastructure.
Kempton, J.J., and J.P. Stewart. 2006. Prediction Equations for Significant Duration of Earthquake Ground Motions Considering Site and Near-Source Effects. Earthquake Spectra 22: 985–1013.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. NGA-West2 – Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Regimes.
Rezaeian, S., P.S. Zhong, H. Hartzell, and F. Zareian. 2015. Validation of Simulated Earthquake Ground Motions Based on Evolution of Intensity and Frequency Content. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am 105.
Karina P. A., S. Ismanto, A. Saputra. 2023. Liquefaction Potential Evaluation In Toba Crater Indonesia. Geomate, vol. 25, no. 110, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.21660/2023.110.3990.
Groholski, D. 2015. Evaluation of 1-D Non-linear Site Response Analysis using a General Quadratic/Hyperbolic Strength-Controlled Constitutive Model.
Brandenberg, S.J., N. Bellana, and T. Shantz. 2010. Shear wave velocity as function of standard penetration test resistance and vertical effective stress at California bridge sites. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30: 1026–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.014.
Darendeli, M.B. 2001. Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction and Material Damping Curves.
Sonmez, H., and C. Gokceoglu. 2005. A Liquefaction Severity Index Suggested to Engineering Practice. Environmental Geology 48: 81–91. DOI 10.1007/s00254-005-1263-9
Idriss, I.M., and R.W. Boulanger. 2008. Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes. Machinery and Production Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1177/136218079700300202.
Idriss, I.M., and R.W. Boulanger. CPT and SPT Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedures. Center for Geotechnical Modeling.
Iwasaki, T., T. Arakawa, and K. Tokida. 1984. Simplified Procedures for Assessing Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes. International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 3: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(84)90027-5.
Sonmez, H. 2003. Modification of the Liquefaction Potential Index and Liquefaction Susceptibility Mapping for a Liquefaction-Prone Area (Inegol,Turkey. Environmental Geology 44: 862–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0831-0.
Fathani, T.F., A.D. Adi, S. Pramumijoyo, and D. Karnawati. 2008. The Determination of Peak Ground Acceleration at Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. Yogyakarta Earthq: 1–15.
Mase, L.Z., S. Likitlersuang, S. Soralump, and T. Tobita. 2015. Empirical Study of Liquefaction Potential in Chiang Rai Province in North of Thailand. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1706.1840.
Youd, T.L., I.M. Idriss, R.D. Andrus, I. Arango, G. Castro, J.T. Christian, R. Dobry, et al. 2001. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 127: 817–33. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:10(817).
Hakam, A., and E. Suhelmidawati. 2013. Liquefaction Due to September 30, 2009 Earthquake in Padang. Procedia Engineering 54: 140–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.013.
Youd, T.L., J.C. Tinsley, D.M. Perkins, E.J. King, and R.F. Preston. 1979. Liquefaction Potensial Map of. San Fernando Valley, California.
Seed, H.B., K. Tokimatsu, L.F. Harder, and R.M. Chung. 1985. of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 111: 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
Bawankule, M., & S. N. Pawar. 2022. Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Nagpur Region Using SPT Data: Field Assessment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1086(1): 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1086/1/012021
