ENJOYABLE GAME DESIGN: A STUDY OF MOTOR-IMPAIRED USER’S PERCEPTION

Authors

  • Nurul Hidayah Mat Zain Faculty Computer and Mathematical Sciences (FSKM), University Technology MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor MALAYSIA
  • Azizah Jaafar Faculty Computer and Mathematical Sciences (FSKM), University Technology MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor MALAYSIA
  • Fariza Hanis Abdul Razak Institute of Visual Informatics, University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), 43600 Bangi, Selangor MALAYSIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5048

Keywords:

Computer games, enjoyment, motor-impaired users, flow theory

Abstract

Nowadays, playing computer games is a popular form of entertainment, which is particularly appealing to university students. This is the case because computer games offer enjoyable experience. However, studies which examine the users’ perception on enjoyable game design are limited, specifically in relation to motor-impaired users. Analyses of such perceptions can support the designer in designing enjoyable games for special needs users. The present study explored motor-impaired users’ perception based on constructs in Flow Theory. Six constructs, namely clear goal, feedback, user control, challenge, immersion and adaptively were used. In total, 42 students from UiTM Malaysia participated in this study. The data were analyzed using standard descriptive statistical methods. The findings of the study showed motor-impaired users’ perception on enjoyable game design. Hopefully, the results of the study will emphasize the need for developing a rigorous game design which is enjoyable for motor-impaired users.

References

Lee, D. and R. LaRose. 2007. A Socio-cognitive Model of Video Game Usage. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 51(4): 632-650.

Eglesz, D., I. Fekete, O. E. Kiss, and L. Izso. 2005. Computer games are fun? On Professional Games and Players’ Motivations. Educational Media International (EMI). 42(2): 117-124.

Chatfield, T. 2011. Fun Inc.: Why Games are the 21st Century’s Most Serious Business. Random House. Virgin Books.

Tan, K. H. 2007. Comparing Games and Case Methods in Enhancing Student Learning. International Journal of Innovation and Learning. 4(3): 224-236.

Tan, K. H., Y. K. Tse, and P. L. Chung. 2010. A Plug and Play Pathway Approach for Operations Management Games Development. Journal of Computers & Education. 55(1): 109-117.Hidayah M. Z. N., A. R. F.

Hanis, J. Azizah, and F. Z. Mohd. 2011. Eye Tracking in Educational Games Environment: Evaluating user Interface Design through Eye Tracking Patterns. In proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Visual Informatics: Sustaining Research Innovations (IVIC 2011). Malaysia. 9-11November 2011. 2: 64-73.

Taradi, S. K., M. Taradi, K. Radić, and N. Pokrajac. 2005. Blending Problem-based Learning with Web Technology Positively Impacts Student Learning Outcomes in Acid-base Physiology. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 29(1): 35-39.

Bourgonjon, J., M. Valcke, R. Soetaert, and T. Schellens. 2010. Students’ Perceptions about the Use of Video Games in the Classroom. Journal of Computers & Education. 54(4): 1145-1156.

Garris, R., R. Ahlers, and J. E. Driskell. 2002. Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research and Practice Model. Simulation & Gaming. 33(4): 441-467.

Anderson, C. 2008. Simulation Game Playing–A Nursing Instructional Strategy. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 4(1): e7-e15.

Birknerová, Z. The Use of Simulation Business Games in University Education. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy. 4(2): 202-215.

Virvou, M., G. Katsionis, and K. Manos. 2005. Combining Software Games with Education: Evaluation of Its Educational Effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society. 8(2): 54-65.

Ibrahim, R., R. C. M. Yusoff, K. Khalil, and A. Jaafar. 2011. Factors Affecting Undergraduates’ Acceptance of Educational Game: An Application of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Visual Informatics: Sustaining Research and Innovations (IVIC 2011). Malaysia. 9-11November 2011. 2. 135-146. Springer.

Ismail, R. and A. Jaafar. 2011. Interactive Screen-based Design for Dyslexic Children. In International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr). Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. 29November-1December, 2011. 168-171. IEEE.

Hidayah, M. Z. N. and J. Azizah. 2011. Integrating Digital Games Based Learning Environments with Eye Gaze-based Interaction. 2011 International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Robotics (ICPAIR). Putrajaya, Malaysia. 28-29June 2011. 2: 222-227.

Yannakakis, G. N. and J. Hallam. 2007. Towards Optimizing Entertainment in Computer Games. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence. 21(10): 933-971.

Hidayah, M. Z. N., J. Azizah, and A. R. Fariza Hanis. 2012. SGameFlow Framework: How to Experience Enjoyment in Serious Game (SG) for Motor Impaired Users (MIU). In 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 12-14June 2012. 2: 1020-1024.

Grellhesl, M. and N. M. Punyanunt-Carter. 2012. Using the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Understand Gratifications Sought through Text Messaging Practices of Male and Female Undergraduate Students. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior. 28(6): 2175-2181.

Lai, C., Q. Wang, and J. Lei. 2012. What Factors Predict Undergraduate Students’ Use of Technology for Learning? A Case from Hong Kong. Journal in Computers & Education. 59(2): 569-579.

Mihaly, C. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.

Boyle, E. A., T. M. Connolly, T. Hainey, and J. M. Boyle. 2012. Engagement in Digital Entertainment Games: A Systematic Review. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior. 28(3): 771-780.

Nakamura, J. and M. Csikszentmihalyi. The Concept of Flow. Handbook of Positive Psychology. 89-105.

Cowley, B., D. Charles, M. Black, and R. Hickey. 2008. Toward an Understanding of Flow in Video Games. In Magazine of Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in entertainment Computers in Entertainment (CIE). 6(2): 20, 20.

Chen, J. 2007. Flow in Games (and everything else). In Magazine of Communications of ACM. 50(4): 31-34.

Csikszentmihalyi M. 1990. The Psychology of Optimal Experience.New York: Harper & Row.

Regenbrecht, H., S. Hoermann, G. McGregor, B. Dixon, E. Franz, C. Ott, L. Hale, T. Schubert, and J. Hoermann. 2012. Augmented Reality: Visual Manipulations for Motor Rehabilitation. Journal of Computers and Graphics. 36(7): 819-834.

Gajos, K. Z., D. S. Weld, and J. O. Wobbrock. 2010. Automatically Generating Personalized User Interfaces with Supple. Journal of Artificial Intelligence. 174(12-13): 910-950.

Gajos, K. Z., J. O. Wobbrock, and D. S. Weld. 2008. Improving the Performance of Motor-Impaired Users with Automatically-Generated, Ability-Based Interfaces. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in computing Systems (CHI 2008). Florence, Italy. 5-10April 2008. 1257-1266.

Yuan, B., E. Folmer, and F. C. Harris. Game accessibility: A survey. Journal of Universal Access in the Information Society. 10(1): 81-100.

Sweetser, P. and P. Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow : A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. ACM Computers in Entertainment. 3(3): 1-24.

Fu, F. L., R.C. Su, and S.C. Yu. 2009. EGameFlow: A Scale to Measure Learners’ Enjoyment of E-Learning Games. Journal of Computers & Education. 52(1): 101-112.

Jegers, K. 2007. Pervasive Game Flow: Understanding Player Enjoyment in Pervasive Gaming. In Magazine Interactive Entertainment of Computers in Entertainment (CIE). 5(1): 9.

Klimmt C., A. Rizzo, P. Vorderer, J. Koch, and T. Fischer. 2009. Experimental Evidence for Suspense as Determinant of Video Game Enjoyment. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 12(1): 29-31.

Klimmt, C., T. Hartmann, and A. Frey. 2007. Effectance and Control as Determinants of Video Game Enjoyment. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 10(6): 845-848.

Schneider,E. F. 2004. Death with a Story. Journal of Human Communication Research. 30(3): 361-375.

Norte, S. and F. G. Lobo. 2008. Sudoku Access: A Sudoku Game for People with Motor Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers and Accessibility (SIGACCESS). Nova Scotia, Canada. 13-15October 2008. 161-168.

Gupta, K. and U. A. Khan. 2012. Critical Analysis of the User Interfaces for the Disabled Community. International Journal of Computer Applications. 42(16): 40-44.

Findlater, L. and J. McGrenere. 2010. Beyond Performance: Feature Awareness in Personalized Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 68(3): 121-137.

Atroshi, I., P.-E. Lyrén, and C. Gummesson. 2009. The 6-item CTS Symptoms Scale: A Brief Outcomes Measure for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Quality of Life Research. 18(3): 347-58.

Mieog, J. S. D., J. P. Morden, J. M. Bliss, R. C. Coombes, and C. J. H. van de Velde. 2012. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Exemestane or Tamoxifen after 2-3 Years of Tamoxifen: A Retrospective Analysis of the Intergroup Exemestane Study. The Lancet Oncology. 13(4): 420-32.

Ijsselsteijn, W. A. , K. Poels, and Y. A. W. de Kort. 2008. The Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a Self-Report Measure to Assess Player Experiences of Digital Games. Manuscript in Preparation.

Petrie, H. and N. Bevan. 2009. The Evaluation of Accessibility , Usability and User Experience. In Stepanidis C. (Ed.). The Universal Access Handbook. CRC Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1998. Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-29

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

ENJOYABLE GAME DESIGN: A STUDY OF MOTOR-IMPAIRED USER’S PERCEPTION. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 75(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5048