NATIONAL E-STRATEGIES FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Zanariah Jano Centre for Languages and Human Development UTeM Melaka, Malaysia
  • Mohd Shamsuri Md Saad Centre for Languages and Human Development UTeM Melaka, Malaysia
  • Aziz Yahya Centre for Languages and Human Development UTeM Melaka, Malaysia
  • Noorli Khamis Centre for Languages and Human Development UTeM Melaka, Malaysia
  • Rabiah Ahmad Centre for Research and Innovation Management UTeM Melaka, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5055

Keywords:

Research, development, e-strategies, Malaysia, ministries

Abstract

This paper investigates empirically different ways to organize e-strategies of Research and Development (R&D) among Malaysian ministries. This study examines the dynamic cycle of e-strategies namely Web resources, Web tools, Assessment and Continual Quality Assessments through the content analyses of the Ministries’ websites. All the strategies support the mission and objectives of the organizations. As universities are seen as the catalysts for the development of R &D, the national policies support them by a means of investment of grants and other strategies which assist the growth of the economy. The Ministries are yet to adequately reflect truly comprehensive and integrated strategies for harnessing and exploiting these potentials in order to gear for internationalization and collaboration across countries. The flaws in the assessment and CQI should be heeded to provide a better system of monitoring. This paper provides interesting insights into the trend of e-strategies of R&D employed by Ministry of Higher Education and Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation in Malaysia. The model of e-strategies utilized in the study will provide guidelines for policy makers within the Ministries in improving their e-strategies to realize their visions and missions. Further research should focus on the e-strategies of universities in Malaysia to ascertain the trends adopted in realizing the vision and mission of Ministries in R&D agenda.

References

Djokovic, D.and V. Souitaris. 2008. Spinouts from Academic Institutions: A Literature Review with Suggestions for Further Research. Journ. of Tech. Transfer. 33(3): 225-247.

National Science Foundation. 2013. [Online] From: http://www.nsf.com [Accessed on January 25, 2013].

U.S. Congress. 1995. Innovation and Commercialization of Emerging Technologies. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.

Drucker, P. F. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. HarperCollins Publishers.

Kroll, H. and I. Liefner. 2008. Spin-off Enterprises as a Means of Technology Commercialization in a Transforming Economy–evidence from Three Universities in China. Technovation. 28(5): 298-313.

Feldman, M., I. Feller, J. Bercovitz, and R. Burton. 2002. Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities. Journal of Management Science. 48(1): 105-121.

Jensen, R. and M. Thursby. 2001. Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions. Americ. Econ. Rev. 91(1): 240-259.

Link, A.N. and J.T. Scott. 2005. Opening the Ivory Tower’s Door: An Analysis of the Determinants of the Formation of U.S University Spin-off Companies. Res. Pol. 34(7): 1106-1112.

Lockett, A. and M. Wright. 2005. Resources, Capabilities, Risk Capital and the Creation of University Spin-out Companies. Res. Pol. 34(7): 1043-1057.

Powers, J.B. and P.P. McDougall. 2005. University Start-up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms That Go Public: A Resource-Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing. 20(3): 291-311.

Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., and M. Gulbrandsen. 2006. Initiatives to Promote Commercialization of University Knowledge.Technovation. 26.2006(4): 518-533.

Shane, S. 2002. University Technology Transfer to Entrepreneurial Companies.Journal of Business Venturing. 17(6): 537-552.

Shane, S. A. 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spin-offs and Wealth Creation. Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pub.

Siegel, D. S, D. Waldman and A. N Link. 2003. Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study. Res. Pol. 32(1): 27-48.

McKinsey, S. 2013. Management Model. [Online] From: http://www.12manage.com/methods_7S.html [Accessed on January 23, 2013].

Wells, J. and D.H. Gobeli. 2003. 3R Framework: Improving eStrategy Across Reach, Richness, and Range. Bus. Horiz. 46: 5-14.

Ministry of Higher Education. [Online] From: www.mohe.gov.my [Accessed on March 13, 2013].

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. 2013. [Online] From: www.mosti.gov. [Accessed on March 13, 2013].

Downloads

Published

2015-07-29

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

NATIONAL E-STRATEGIES FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 75(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5055