Parents’ Perceptions of Selecting Language of Instruction for their Children’s Primary Education in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v2n1.18Keywords:
Receptive vocabulary, vocabulary profile, word levels, university studentsAbstract
The study examines the influence of parents’ educational background on the selection of language of instruction for their children’s primary education and their beliefs on the impact of language of instruction on children’s academic capabilities, career prospect and personal characteristics. A survey was conducted on 400 Chinese parents with a child in primary one in Kuching, Sarawak. The results showed that the parents’ educational background influenced their choice of language of instruction for their children’s primary education. The Chinese-educated parents in Kuching are more likely to enrol their children in Chinese-medium schools while English- and Malay-educated parents prefer Malay-medium schools. The Chinese-educated parents choose Chinese-medium school as they believed that their children would have better career prospects, more useful qualifications, academic competencies, particularly in Mandarin, mathematics and science, and greater appreciation of Chinese culture. The Chinese-educated parents also believed that their children would be proficient in English and Bahasa Malaysia, hardworking, open-minded and racially tolerant but the English- and Malay-medium educated parents disagreed on these perceived impacts of Chinese education and believed that their children studying in Malay-medium schools are just as likely to have these characteristics. The findings suggest that parental choice of school language of instruction may be a proxy for choosing the school culture associated with Chinese- and Malay-medium schools.References
Ali, N. L. 2012. English in Primary Education in Malaysia: Policies, Outcomes and Stakeholders’ Lived Experiences. Current Issues
in Language Planning. 12(2): 147–166.
Ali, N. L. 2013. A Changing Paradigm in Language Planning: English-medium Instruction Policy at the Tertiary Level in
Malaysia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1): 73–92.
Armor, D. & Peiser, B. 1998. Inter-district Choice in Massachusetts. In Learning from School Choice. Edited by P. E. Peterson and
B. C. Hassel (Eds). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Ball, S. J., Bowe, R. & Gewirtz, S. 1995. Circuits of Schooling: A Sociological Exploration of Parental Choice of School in SocialClass
Contexts. The Sociological Review. 43(1): 52–78.
Bauch, P. & Goldring, E. 1995. Parent Involvement and School Responsiveness: Facilitating the Home-school Connection in
Schools of Choice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 17(1): 1–22.
Breakwell, G. M. 1992. Social psychology of Identity and the Self Concept. London: Surrey University Press.
Bridge, R. G. & Blackman, J. 1978. A Study of Alternatives in American Education IV: Family Choice in Schooling. Santa Monica,
CA: Rand.
Bussell, H. 1998. Parental Choice of Primary School: An Application of Q-Methodology. The Service Industries Journal. 18(3): 135–147.
Campbell, Y. M., Chuah, K. M., & Ting, S. H. 2012, November 7–9. Connecting the Dots: Views on Promoting Bidayuh Language
Learning via E-Folktales. Proceedings of International Conference on Linguistics, Literature and Culture (ICLLIC 2012), Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Chen, C. H., & Zimitat, C. 2006. Understanding Taiwanese Students’ Decision-making Factors Regarding Australian International
Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(2): 91–100. doi: 10.1108/09513540610646082.
Coldron, J., & Boulton, P. 1991. ‘Happiness’ as a Criterion of Parents’ Choice of School. Journal of Education Policy. 6(2): 169–178.
Coser, L. A., Nock, S. L., Steffan, P. A., & Spain, D. 1991. Introduction to Sociology. 3rd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Crocombe, R. 1994. Pacific Science in the 21st Century. In Science of the Pacific Island Peoples- Education, Language, Patterns and
Policy. Edited by J. Morison, P. Geraghty, and L. Crowl (Ed.). Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies. 4154.
Dang, T. K. A., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Le, T. T. T. 2013. The impacts of globalisation on EFL teacher education through English as a medium of instruction: An example from Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1): 52–72.
Denessen, E., Driessena, G., & Sleegers, P. 2005. Segregation by Choice? A Study of Group-specific Reasons for School Choice. Journal of Education Policy. 20(3): 347–368.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. 2014. Population distribution and basic demographic characteristic report 2010: Ethnic composition. Retrieved November 11, 2014, from http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index.php?option=com_content&id=1215.
Edwards, J. 1977. Language in Group and Individual Identity. In Social Psychology of Identity and the Self Concept. Edited by G.
M. Breakwell (Ed.). London: Surrey University Press. 129–146.
Elacqua, G. Gobierno, E. & Ibanez, U. 2005. School Choice in Chile: An Analysis of Parental Preferences and Search Behaviour.
National Centre for the Study of Privatization in Education. 1–35.
Federal Constitution. 1957. Laws of Malaysia. Retrieved July 5, 2012, from http://www.jac.gov.my/images/stories/akta/federalconstitution.pdf.
Fishman, J. 1972. Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley: Newbury House.
Fishman, J. A., & Garcia, O. 2010. Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity: Disciplinary and Regional Perspectives. 2nd ed. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Fuson, K. C., & Kwon, Y. 1991. Chinese-based Regular and European Irregular Systems of Number Words: The Disadvantages
for English-speaking Children. In Language and Mathematical Education. Edited by K. Durkin and B. Shire (Eds.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press. 211–226.
Gal, S. 1979. Language Shift: Social Determinants of Language Change in Bilingual Austria. New York: Academic Press.
Goh, E. 2007. Primary School Choice Selection: Examining Parental School Choice Decision Behavior Using the Theory of Reasoned
Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Retrieved July 18, 2013, fromhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAB&url=http%3A
%2F%2Fro.uow.edu.au%2Fcgi%2Fviewcontent.cgi%3Farticle%3D1617%26context%3Dtheses&ei=kbvwUZzCA8_jr
AfhxYH4DA&usg=AFQjCNH4qUpgPU06Q-An1IetYq-99j2Ewg&bvm=bv.49784469,d.bmk.
Goldring, E. B., & Hausman, C. S. 1999. Reasons for Parental Choice of Urban Schools. Journal of Education Policy. 14(5): 469–490. doi: 10.1080/026809399286161.
Gudykunst, W., & Ting-Toomey, S. 1990. Ethnic Identity, Language, and Communication Breakdowns. In Handbook of Language
and Social Psychology. Edited by H. Giles and P. Robinson (Eds.). London: Wiley. 307–327.
Halverson, C. B. 2008. Social Identity Group and Individual Behaviour. Effective Multicultural Teams: Theory and Practice. 3: 43–79.
Hamid, M. O., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Baldauf, R. B. 2014. Medium of Instruction in Asia: Context, Processes and Outcomes. Current
Issues in Language Planning. 14(1): 1–15.
Hashimoto, K. 2014. ‘English-only’, but Not a Medium-of-Instruction Policy: The Japanese Way of Internationalising Education
for Both Domestic and Overseas Students. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1): 16–33.
Ho, C. S. H., & Fuson, K. C. 1998. Children’s Knowledge of Teen Quantities as Tens and Ones: Comparisons of Chinese, British,
and American Kindergartners. Journal of Educational Psychology. 90(3): 1536–1544.
Huebner, T. 1986. Vernacular Literacy, English as a Language of Wider Communication and Language Shift in American Samoa.
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 7(5): 393–411.
Hurtado, A., & Gurin, P. 1995. Ethnic Identity and Bilingualism Attitudes. In Hispanic Psychology. Edited by A. Padilla (Ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 89–103.
Immerfall, S. & Therborn, G. 2010. Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st Century. New York: Springer.
Immerfall, S., Boehnke, K., & Baier, D. 2010. Identity. In Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st
Century. Edited by S. Immerfall, & S. Therborn (Eds.). 325–353. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-88199-7_11, 325.
Jackson, C. & Bisset, M. 2005. Gender and School Choice: Factors Influencing Parents When Choosing Single-Sex or CoEducational
Independent Schools for Their Children. Cambridge Journal of Education. 35(2): 195–211.
Jaspal, R., & Coyle, A. 2010. My Language, My People: Language and Ethnic Identity Among British-born South Asians. Retrieved
May 26, 2014, from http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/577003/1/Coyle%202010%20My%20language%20my%20people.pdf.
Kleitz, B., Weiher, G. R., Tedin, K., & Matland, R. 2000. Choice, Charter Schools, and Household Preferences. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3). Retrieved November 11, 2013, from http://orion.luc.edu/~rmatlan/pdf/2000ChoiceCharterSchools.f.
Ku, H. T. 2003. Education and Identity: A Study on Chinese Secondary Education in Malaysia (1945-2000). Xiamen: Xiamen
University Press.
Lee, K. H. 1997. Malaysian Chinese: Seeking Identity in Wawasan 2020. In Ethnic Chinese as Southeast Asians. Edited by L.
Suryadinata (Ed.). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asians Studies. 72–107.
Lee, Y. F. 2009. Everyday Identities in Malaysian Chinese’s subjectivities. Retrieved November 10, 2012, from
http://www.ukm.my/penerbit/akademika/ACROBATAKADEMIKA75/akademika75[02].pdf.
Liebkind, K. 1992. Ethnic Identity: Challenging the Boundaries of Social Psychology. In Social Psychology of Identity and the Self
Concept. Edited by G. M. Breakwell (Ed.). London: Surrey University Press. 147–185.
Loh, F. K. W. 2002. Developmentalism and the Limits of Democratic Discourse. In Democracy in Malaysia: Discourses and Practices. Edited by F. K. W. Loh and B. T. Khoo (Eds). New York: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies. 19–50.
Martinez, V., Thomas, K., & Kemerer, F. 1994. Who Chooses and Why: A Look at Five Choice Plans. Phi Delta Kappan. 9: 678–681.
Miller, K. F., Kelly, M. K., & Zhou, X. 2005. Learning Mathematics in China and The United States: Cross-cultural Insights Into the Nature and Course of Mathematical Development. In Handbook of Mathematical Cognition. Edited by J. I. D. Campbell
(Ed.). New York: Psychology Press. 163-178. Retrieved April 28, 2014, from http://www.rcgd.isr.umich.edu/life/Readings2007/Miller%20Ed%20Reading%201.pdf.
Miller, P., & Hoogstra, L. 1992. Language as Tool in the Socialization and Apprehension of Cultural Meanings. In New Directions in Psychological Anthropology. Edited by T. Schwartz, G. White and C. Lutz (Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. 83–101.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. 2012. Preliminary Report: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Retrieved April 26, 2014,
from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng.pdf.
Moe, T. M. 1995. Private Vouchers. In Private Vouchers. Edited by T. M. Moe (Ed.). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institute Press. 1-40.
Myhill, J. 2003. The Native Speaker, Identity and the Authenticity Hierarchy. Language Sciences. 25(1): 77–97.
Omar, A. 1985. The Language Policy of Malaysia: A Formula for Balanced Pluralism. Retrieved July 5, 2012, from
http://sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/asmah1985language.pdf.
Phinney, J. 1990. Ethnic Identity in Adolescents and Adults: A Review of Research. Psychological Bulletin. 108(3): 499–514.
Phinney, J. S., Romero, I., Nava, M., & Huang, D. 2001. The Role of Language, Parents, and Peers in Ethnic Identity Among
Adolescents in Immigrant Families. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(2): 301–322. Retrieved December 5, 2012, from
http://potowski.org/sites/potowski.org/files/Phinney_et_al_2001.pdf.
RM15.5m for Chinese Primary Schools. 2013, April 10. The Borneo Post. Retrieved July 31, 2013, from
http://www.pemandu.gov.my/gtp/Media_Coverage-@
RM15@5m_for_Chinese_primary_schools.aspx#sthash.uPItIVGk.dpuf.
Roberts, R. E., Phinney, J. S., Masse, L. C., Chen, Y. R., Roberts, C. R., & Romero, A. 1999. The Structure of Ethnic Identity of Young Adolescents from Diverse Ethnocultural Groups. Journal of Early Adolescence. 19(3): 301–322. Retrieved December
, 2012, from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic551690.files/Roberts%20et%20al.pdf.
Rossell, C. H. 1985. What is Attractive About Magnet Schools? Urban Education. 20(1): 7–22.
Simanu-Klutz, F. 1999. Language of Instruction: Choices and Consequences. Retrieved February 28, 2014, from
Spolsky, B. 2009. Towards a Theory of Language Management. Retrieved April 14, 2012, from http://assets.cambridge.org/97805217/35971/excerpt/9780521735971_excerpt.pdf.
Tan, M. G. 1997. The ethnic Chinese in Indonesia: Issues of Identity. In Ethnic Chinese as Southeast Asians. Edited by L.
Suryadinata (Ed.). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. 33–65.
Ting, S. H. 2001. When is English not the Right Choice in Sarawak, Malaysia. English Today. 65: 54–56.
Ting, S. H., & Campbell, Y. M. 2013, November. Salience of Language as an Ethnic Marker: A Snapshot of the Bidayuh of Sarawak,
Malaysia. Paper presented at the International Conference on Languages 2013 (ICL2013), Phuket, Thailand.
Ting, S. H., & Rose, L. 2014. Ethnic Language Use and Ethnic Identity for Sarawak Indigenous Groups in Malaysia. Oceanic
Linguistics, 53(1): 92–109. DOI: 10.1353/ol.2014.0002.
Toping, D. 1981. The Decline of Pacifc Languages. The New Pacific (July/August issue).
Weiher, G. & Tedin, K. 2002. Does Choice Lead to Racially Distinctive Schools? Charter Schools and Household Preferences.
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 21(1): 79–92.
Williams, M. F., Hancher, K. S. & Hunter, A. 1983. Parents and School Choice: A Household Survey. Washington DC: Office of
Educational Research and Improvement.
Witte, J. 1990. Choice and Control: An Analytical Overview. In Choice and Control in American Education: The Theory of Choice and Control in American Education. Edited by W. Clune and J. Witte (Eds.). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press. 11–46.
Yusof, A. 1998. Implementation of Education Policy in Malaysia. Retrieved April 6, 2012, fromhttp://azman97.tripod.com/essay8.html.
