The Influence of Content Familiarity, Gender Difference and Proficiency Level on Reading Comprehension Performance: A Study on Malaysian Undergraduate Students in UPM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v4n1.48Abstract
Much research has been done on the influence of several variables individually on Reading comprehension, but the influence of these variables as a whole was not given much attention. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between reading comprehension as a dependent variable and three independent variables namely: gender differences, English language proficiency level and content familiarity. An additional goal was to examine the interrelation between the three independent variables. The participants were 127 male and female Malaysian students attending English language proficiency classes at the English language department in University Putra Malaysia (UPM). The study employed a quantitative approach and the data was collected through a questionnaire which was of three main parts: two reading passages (one is content-familiar and the other one is content- unfamiliar texts) and a written interview. All participants were asked to answer the whole survey and then they were classified on the basis of their proficiency level and gender. The major findings revealed that there was a direct relation between content familiarity and reading comprehension while there was an indirect relation between each of gender differences and English language proficiency level on one side and reading comprehension on the other side.References
Al-Mahrooqi, R. 2012. Reading Literature in English: Challenges Facing Omani College Students. Asian EFL Journal. 57: 24-51.
Al-Shumaimeri, Y. A. 2005. Gender Differences in Reading Comprehension Performance in Relation to Content Familiarity of Gender-Neutral Texts. Paper Presented at the Second International Conference: Language, Culture and Literature, Minia University, Egypt.
Al-Shumaimeri, Y. A. 2006. The Effects of Content Familiarity and Language Ability on Reading Comprehension Performance of Low-and High-Ability Saudi Tertiary Students Studying English as a Foreign Language. Journal of King Saud University.
Anderson, N. J., & Cheng, X. 1999. Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. Heinle & Heinle Boston^ eMA MA.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. 1985. Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the National Commission on Reading. Washington: National Inst. of Education.
Bartlett, F. 1932. Remembering.
Beck, I. L., & Juel, C. 1995. The Role of Decoding in Learning to Read. American Educator. 19(2): 8.
Beyer, J. 2007. Strategies for Helping Struggling Readers Comprehend Expository Text. Strategies.
Bransford, J. D. 1984. Schema Activation and Schema Acquisition: Comments on Richard C. Anderson's Remarks. Learning to Read in American Schools: Basal Readers and Content Texts. 259-272.
Brantmeier, C. 2003. Does Gender Make A Difference? Passage Content and Comprehension in Second Language Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language. 15(1): 1-27.
Brantmeier, C. 2003. Does Gender Make a Difference? Passage Content and Comprehension in Second Language Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language. 15(1): 1-27.
Chastain, K. 1988. Developing Second-language Skills: Theory and Practice. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (San Diego).
Coles, M., & Hall, C. 2002. Gendered Readings: Learning from Children’s Reading Choices. Journal of Research in Reading. 25(1): 96-108.
Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. 1983. Reading Strategies Training for Meaningful Learning from Prose Cognitive Strategy Research. Springer. 87-131.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, M. R. 2011. A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners' English Listening Comprehension and the Strategies for Improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2(5): 977-988.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. 2002. Teaching and Researching. Reading: Allyn & Bacon.
Jennings, J. H., Caldwell, J., & Lerner, J. W. 2009. Reading Problems Assessment and Teaching Strategies. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
Jensen, M. 2010. Improving Reading Comprehension of Junior Division Students as the Teacher-Librarian: An Action Research Study. Nipissing University.
Keshavarz, M. H., Atai, M. R., & Ahmadi, H. 2007. Content Schemata, Linguistic Simplification, and EFL Readers’ Comprehension and Recall. Reading in a Foreign Language. 19(1): 19-33.
Li, C.-H., & Lai, S.-F. 2012. The Functions of Cultural Schemata in the Chinese Reading Comprehension and Reading Time of College Students in Taiwan. Journal of International Education Research (JIER). 8(2): 105-112.
Montelongo, J. A., & Hernández, A. C. 2007. Reinforcing Expository Reading and Writing Skills: A More Versatile Sentence Completion Task. The Reading Teacher. 60(6): 538-546.
Perfetti, C. A. 1985. Reading Ability. Oxford University Press New York.
Rubin, D. 1993. A Practical Approach to Teaching Reading. Allyn and Bacon Boston, MA.
Rumelhart, D. E. 1980. Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition. In; RJ Spiro/BC Bruce/WF Brewer (Eds.). Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Hillsdale, NJ, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. 1977. The Representation of Knowledge in Memory1. Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. 99.
Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. 2003. Text Familiarity, Reading Tasks, and ESP Test Performance: A Study on Iranian Lep and Non-Lep University Students. Reading. 3(1).
Schoenbach, R., Greenleaf, C., Cziko, C., & Hurwitz, L. 1999. Reading for Understanding: A Guide to Improving Reading in Middle and High School Classrooms. The Jossey-Bass Education Series: ERIC.
Smith, F. 1978. Reading. Cambridge University Press. Great Britain.
Sotoudehnama, E., & Asadian, M. 2011. Effect of Gender-oriented Content Familiarity and Test Types on Reading Comprehension. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) (Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities).
Wixson, K. K., Peters, C. W., Weber, E. M., & Roeber, E. D. 1987. New Directions in Statewide Reading Assessment. The Reading Teacher. 40(8): 749-754.
Xiao, Y. 2008. Building Formal Schemata with ESL Student Writers: Linking Schema Theory to Contrastive Rhetoric. Asian EFL Journal. 32(2), 1-20.
(Interpreting two-way ANOVA), Retrieved May, 20, from http://www.graphpad.com/articles/interpret/anova/two_way.htm.
(Nablus soap), Retrieved May, 19, from http://www.nablussoap.eu/about-nablus-soap/.
(ANOVA test), Retrieved May, 20, from http://www.experiment-resources.com/anova-test.html.
