The Functions of Language in Shaping Tourism Information
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v4n2.53Abstract
Providing tourists with sufficient information is one of the most crucial tasks to tourism operators. One way of achieving the goal is by means of language. This paper thus aims to discuss the functions of language in shaping various types of information to cater tourists’ diverse needs. In this study, a survey and interview were conducted to gauge the types of information which tourists perceive important and, in addition, text analysis was carried out on tourism brochures, websites and tourist information boards to grasp the functions of language in realising such messages. A total of 155 questionnaires with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.876 was used for the data analysis and the findings show that the most important information needed is on security and safety followed by attractive and appealing destinations, available facilities and public transportation. In addition, the important information on tourism commodities that tourists need is about Malaysian people in general which includes cultures and history. Similarly, the findings of text analysis highlight that the language use in tourism promotional materials is geared towards foregrounding those types of information. However, not all types of information needed by tourists are given equal attention.References
Aitchison, C. 2001. Theorizing Other Discourses of Tourism, Gender and Culture. Tourist Studies. 1(2): 133-147.
Dredge, D., & Jenkins, J. 2007. Tourism Planning and Policy. USA: John Wiley and Son.
Endesor, T. 2001. Performing Tourism, Staging Tourism: (Re) Producing Tourist Space and Practice. Tourist Studies. 1(1): 59-81.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. UK: Arnold.
Harper, S. C. 2003. The McGraw-Hill Guide to Starting Your Own Business. USA: McGraw Hill.
Hassan, H., Habil, H., & Nasir, Z. M. 2008. Persuasive Strategies of Tourism Discourse. In H. Habil & H. Hanita (Eds). New Perspectives in Language and Communication Research. Skudai: Penerbit UTM. 1-19.
Hassan, H. 2014. The Representation of Malaysian Cultures in Tourism Brochures. PSBS. 118: 140-151
Hodge, R. & Kress, G. 1988. Social Semiotics. NY: Cornell University Press.
Jaworski, A., & Pritchard, A. 2005. Discourse, Communication and Tourism. UK: Channel Publication.
MacChannel, D. 1976. The Tourist: New Theory of Leisure Class. USA: University of California Press.
Mowforth, M., & Munt, I. 2003. Tourism and Sustainability: Development and New Tourism in the Third World. London: RoutledgeNadzri, N.S.M., & Hassan, H. 2013. The Language Identities of Malaysians as Portrayed in Upin and Ipin. Jurnal Teknologi. 65(2): 109-114
Palmer, C. 1999. Tourism and the symbols of Identity, Tourism Management. 20: 313-321.
Rojek, C., & Urry, J. 1997. Touring Culturess: Transformation of Travel and Theory. London: Routledge.
Salim, M. A., Ibrahim, N. A., & Hassan, H. 2014. Promoting Diversity via Linguistic and Visual Resources: An Analysis of the Malaysian Tourism Website. International Language for Specific Journal. 1: 1-14.
Taylor, P. 1998. Consuming Identity: Modernity and Tourism in New Zealand. New Zealand: University of Auckland.
Thackeray, R., Neiger, B. L., & Hanson, C. L. 2007. Developing a Promotional Strategy: Important Questions for Social Marketing. Health Promotion Practice. 8(4): 332-336.
Urry, J. 2002. The Tourist Gaze. 2nd ed. UK: Sage.
Vertovec, S. & Wessendorf, S. 2004. Migration and Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Diversity in Europe: An Overview of Issues and Trends. UK: OUP.
Wen, S. C., & Chia, C. M. 2013. Tourist Experience Expectations: Questionnaire Development and Text Narrative Analysis. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research. 7(1): 93-104.
White, C. M. 2007. More Authentic than Thou: Authenticity and Othering in Fiji Tourism Discourse. Tourist Studies. 7(25): 25-49.
