Ambiguities in English Language Teaching: Designing English for Specific Purposes Courses for a Discipline-Specific Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v4n2.54Keywords:
Communication barriers, culture, norms, valuesAbstract
The need for English language teaching to address specific language needs for a discipline has instigated growing demands for English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses in higher education institutions in Malaysia. In the context of a university which focuses on engineering programmes, monitored by an engineering professional body, ESP courses designed and developed for higher education are expected to include learning outcomes which reflect integration between English language and engineering fields. In other words, these English language courses need to address the language needs in the engineering field. Thus, English language educators within this context need to have relevant knowledge and skills to enable them to design and develop appropriate ESP courses. Questions arise in relation to how English language courses developed have addressed this expectation. This paper examines the extent to which this expectation is translated into the ESP courses at one technical university in Malaysia. The findings showcase how this expectation is disseminated to the English language educators. This paper provides insight into the complex process of designing English language courses that could address the language needs of the engineering field. In addition, this paper highlights aspects to consider when designing an ESP course for a specific discipline.References
ABET. 2009. Accreditation Policy and Procedure Manual. 14 February. http://www.abet.org/uploadedFiles/Accreditation/Accreditation_Process/Accreditation_Documents/Archive/appm-2010-2011.pdf.
ABET. 2010. Outcomes Assessment and Continous improvement. March 22. http://www.abet.org/history.shtml.
Aziz, A. A., Megat Mohd Noor, M. J., Abang Ali, A. A. and Jaafar, M. S. 2006. A Malaysian Outcome-based Engineering Educational Model. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2: 14-21.
Baik, C. and Greig, J. 2009. Improving the Academic Outcomes of Undergraduate ESL Students: The Case for Discipline-based Academic Skills Programs. Higher Education Research & Development, 28: 401-416.
Basturkmen, H. 2012. Languages for Specific Purposes Curriculum Creation and Implementation in Australasia and Europe. The Modern Language Journal. 96: 59-79.
Bhatia, V. K. 2007. Genre analysis, ESP and Professional Practice. English for Specific Purposes. 27: 161-174.
Bradley, A. B. 2010. Report to Australian Council of Engineering Deans. Engineers Australia, Australian Engineering Accreditation Centre.
Bradley, A. B. 2011. Accreditation Management System for Engineering Education Programs (Curriculum Based). Engineers Australia S02EA_Curr, 2011.
Cousin, G. 2005. Case Study Research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 29: 421-427.
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. 2005. Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Engineering Accreditation Council. 2012. Engineering Programme Accreditation Manual. Engineering Accreditation Council/BEM, 2012.
Gabrielli, A., Gabrielli, C. and Pahlm, H. 2012. Engineering Maritime English: A Symbiosis between Language, Communcation and an Alligator Spanner Wrench? International Maritime English Conference IMEC 24, 1 - 4 October. Yangon, Myanmar. 41-52.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. and Airasian, P. 2012. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. 10th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Grosse, C. U. and Vought, G. M. 2012. The Continuing Evolution of Languages for Specific Purposes. The Modern Language Journal. 96: 190-202.
Hashim, R. and Mohd Din, M. A. 2009. Implementing Outcome based Education Using Project BasedLearning at University of Malaya. European Journal of Scientific Research. 26: 73-79.
Hou, H.-I. 2013. A Needs Analysis of Culinary Arts Majors' ESP Learning in Taiwan's Context. Asian ESP Journal. 9: 5-34.
Hyland, K. 2002. Specificity Revisited: How Far Should We Go Now? English for Specific Purposes. 21: 385-395.
Johnson, B. and Christensen, L. 2004. Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches. 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
Kirkgöz, Y. 2009. Students' and Lecturers' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Foreign Language Instruction in an English-Medium University in Turkey. Teaching in Higher Education. 14: 81-93.
Kuteeva, M. and Airey, J. 2013. Disciplinary Differences in the Use of English in Higher Education: Reflections on Recent Language Policy Developments. Higher Education.
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. B. 2006. Designing Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Medrea, N. and Rus, D. 2012. Challenges in Teaching ESP: Teaching Resources and Students' Needs, Procedia Economics and Finance. 3: 1165-1169.
Mustapha, S. M. and Yahya, R. A. 2013. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Malaysian Context: Its Implementation in Selected Community Colleges. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences. 90: 788-794.
Neuman, W. L. 2011. Social Research Methods. Boston: Pearson.
Nicometo, C., Anderson, K., Nathans-Kelly, T., Courter, S. and McGlamery, T. 2010. More than just Engineers-How Engineers Define and Value Communication Skills on the Job. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Conference. Louisville, KY, June.
North, S. 2005. Different Values, Different Skills? A Comparison of Essay Writing by Students from Arts and Science Backgrounds. Studies in Higher Education. 30: 517-533.
Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Popescu, A. V. 2012. Teaching ESP-1st Year Students of Electronics and Telecommunications. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences. 46: 4181-4185.
Riemer, M. J. 2007. Communication Skills for the 21st Century Engineer. Global Journal of Engineering Education. 11: 1-12.
Shi, J. 2013. ESP: A Needs-oriented Approach for Scientific English Education. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, Luoyang, China, September 25-27.
Silverman, D.and Marvasti, A. 2008. Doing Qualitative Research : A Comprehensive Guide. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Stake, R. E. 2005. Qualitative Case Studies. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 443-466.
Swanborn, P. G. 2010. Case Study Research: Why, What and How. Los Angeles: Sage.
Tan, M. 2011. Mathematics and Science Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding the Teaching of Language in Content Learning. Language Teaching Research. 15: 325-342.
Umera-Okeke, N. and Okeke, A. 2014. An Evaluation of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) as a Modern Trend in English Language Teaching (ELT). African Research Review. 8: 179-188.
Yin, R. K. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
