Industries’ Requirements and Expectations of Graduates: A Revisit

Authors

  • Nur Ashiquin C. Alih Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Masdinah Alauyah Md. Yusof Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Halim Abdul Raof Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Wan Zarina Wan Zakaria Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Sarimah Shamsudin Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Noor Abidah Mohd Omar Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Fauziah Ismail Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Johana Jobil Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v5n1.66

Keywords:

Non-native teacher talk, second language science classroom, teacher generated acts

Abstract

Graduate employability has become more rigid nowadays whereby industries demand not only for graduates’ academic qualifications but also their ability to communicate in English. However, there is hardly any exit test instrument available in higher learning institutions that could gauge the graduates’ communicative competence before graduation. Thus, to address this matter, the Test of English for Communication Skills (UTM-TECS) was developed aims to provide potential employers with a more accurate measure of graduates’ readiness to function in the workplace. Given that the demand of English in the workplace is continuously changing through time, it is therefore important to ensure the assessment scale used to assess graduates’ oral competency takes into account the latest and up-dated requirements and expectations sought by industries. Hence, this study was conducted to investigate the current criteria that the industries adopt in recruiting new graduates.  Besides that, the study also aims to compare the industries’ assessment criteria with the criteria used in the UTM-TECS scale. This study utilized interviews as the data collection method and eight Human Resource personnel from different firms in Johor Bahru and Kuala Lumpur were involved. The study reveals that academic degree is needed for screening purposes; i.e. to shortlist the potential employees. In addition to that, soft skills which comprise of communication skill especially the English language speaking skill, team work, attitude, professional image and critical thinking ability are amongst the criteria used to select graduates for employment. It was discovered that the criteria listed by the respondents were almost similar to the criteria found in the scale except for one criterion; attitude which is not present in the UTM-TECS assessment scale. The respondents also viewed professional image as the highest of importance as compared to the UTM-TECS assessment weightage. The findings from the study could be useful in re-validating the UTM-TECS oral interaction scale so as to ensure its quality and to improve it tobecome a better yardstick for graduates’ employability and marketability.

References

Abdul Raof, A. H. et al. 2011. Profiling Graduating Students’ Workplace Oral Communicative Competence. British Council. New Directions: Assessment and Evaluation, a Collection of Papers.

Amizurah, H. et al. 2003. Adopting Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Approach to Enhance Oral Competencies among Students: Teachers’ Attitudes and Beliefs. Retrieved on 20th April 2015 taken from http://repo.uum.edu.my/3251/1/Ai.pdf.

Andersen, H. and Rasmussen, E. S. 2004. The Role of Language Skills in Corporate Communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 9(3): 231-242.

Anie, A. et al. 2014. Determining the Oral Construct of the Test of English Communication Skills (TECS). Sains Humanika. UTM Press.

Challa, S. S. J. 2007. How to Improve Your Soft Skills at Work. Retrieved on 23rd February, 2013 taken from http://www.rediff.com/getahead/2007/jan/09soft.html.

Chan and Wong. 2004. Assessing Oral Skills of Pre-Tertiary Students: The Nature of the Communicative Act. International Conference on English Instruction and Assessment. 33-48. Retrieved on 2nd May 2015 taken from http://fllcccu.ccu.edu.tw/conference/2004ch_conferences/achievement/paper01.pdf.

Costello, M. 2006. Professional Image in the Workplace: Is it Important? Image Matters. Retrieved on 20th November, 2015 from: https://www.soa.org/library/newsletters/stepping-stone/2006/april/ssn-2006-iss22-costello.pdf.

Crosling, G. n.d. Transition to University: The role of Oral Communication in the Undergraduate Curriculum. Retrieved on 2nd May 2015 taken from http://www.aair.org.au/app/webroot/media/pdf/JIR/Journal%20of%20Institutional%20Research%20in%20Australasia%20and%20JIR/Volume%209,%20No.%201%20May%202000/Crosling.pdf.

Crosling, G. and Ward, I. 2002. Oral Communication: The Workplace Needs and Uses of Business Graduate Employees. English for Specific Purposes. 21(1): 41–57. Retrieved on 14th March 2015 taken from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490600000314#.

Ezihaslinda, et al. 2011. The Need for Competent Work Ready English Language Learners. Procedia Behavioural and Social Sciences. 29. 1490-1499. Retrieved on 4th March 2015 taken from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042811028564.

Hunt, J. W. and Baruch, Y. 2003. Developing top managers: The Impact of Interpersonal Skills Training. Journal of Management Development. 22(8): 729-752.

Kahirol, M.S. et al. 2010. Globalization’s Impact on Soft Skills Demand in the Malaysian Workforce and Organizations: What Makes Graduates Employable? Proceedings of the 1stUPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training Bandung, Indonesia, 10-11 November 2010. 210-215.

Kim, H and Elder, C. 2014. Interrogating the Construct of Aviation English: Feedback from Test Takers in Korea. Language Testing. 1-21. Retrieved on 3rd April 2015 taken from http://ltj.sagepub.com/content/32/2/129.full.pdf+html.

Knoch, U. (2014). Using Subject Specialist to Validate an ESP Rating Scale: The Case of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Rating Scale. English for Specific Purposes. 33: 77-86. Retrieved on 12th March 2015 taken from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088949061300063X.

Lau, A. and Pang, M. (2001) Career Strategies to Strengthen Graduate Employees' Employment Position in the Hong Kong Labour Market. Education + Training. 42(3): 135-149. Retrieved on 23rd March 2015 taken from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/00400910010372689.

Masura, R. et al. 2011. Relationship between Employability and Graduates’ Skill. Procedia Behavioural Science. Sciverse Science Direct. 59: 591-597. Retrieved on 12th March 2015 taken from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812037664.

Moslehifar, M. A. and Noor Aireen, I. 2012. English Language Oral Communication Needs at the Workplace: Feedback from Human Resource Development (HRD) Trainees. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 66(7): 529-536. Retrieved on 12th March 2015 taken from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812052822.

Moy, J. W and Lam, K. F. 2004. Selection Criteria and the Impact of Personality on Getting Hired. Personal Review. 33(5): 521-535.

Nabi, G. R. 2003. Graduate Employment And Underemployment: Opportunity For Skill Use And Career Experiences Amongst Recent Business Graduates. Education and Training. 45(7): 371-382.

Pool, L. D. and Sewell, P. 2007. The Key To Employability: Developing A Practical Model of Graduate Employability. Education and Training. 49(4): 277-289.

Quek, A. H. 2005. Learning for the Workplace: A Case Study in Graduate Employees’ Generic Competencies. Journal of Workplace Learning. 17(4): 231-242.

Rethinasamy, S. and Chuah, K. M. 2011. The Malaysian University English Test (MUET) and its Use for Placement Purposes: A Predictive Validity Study. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 8(2): 234-245. Retrieved on 30th March 2015 taken from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v8n22011/rethinasamy.pdf.

Richards, J. C. 2006. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Retrieved on 4th March 2015 taken from http://www.professorjackrichards.com/pdfs/communicative-language-teachingtoday-v2.pdf.

Saadiyah, D and Kaladevi, S. 2009. Error Analysis of the Written English Essays of Secondary School Students in Malaysia: A Case Study. European Journal of Social Sciences. 8(3): 483-495. Retrieved on 21st May 2015 taken from http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Saadiyah_Darus/publication/235772401_Error_analysis_of_the_written_english_essays_of_secondary_school_students_in_Malaysia_A_case_study/links/0fcfd5136c391c2a5d000000.pdf.

Sulia, M. C. R. 2008. Peer-to-peer Corrective Feedback in a Group Interaction. Bachelor Degree. University Teknologi Malaysia.

Zaharim, A. et al. 2009. Employers' Perceptions and Expectation toward Engineering Graduates: A Study Case. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference On Engineering. 23-29. Retrieved on 30th April 2015 taken from http://www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2009/rodos/EDU/EDU01.pdf.

Zhang, X and Zou, X. 2013. University Students’ Employability Skills Model Based on Chinese Employer Perspective. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies. 1: 29-33. Retrieved on 28th April 2015 taken from http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=37271#.VYJ4Yax8NZY.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-30

How to Cite

Industries’ Requirements and Expectations of Graduates: A Revisit. (2018). LSP International Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v5n1.66