Receptive Vocabulary Levels of Malaysian University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v5n1.68Keywords:
Public Speaking, Needs Analysis (NA), Communication Apprehension (CA)Abstract
Acquiring adequate vocabulary knowledge is necessary for English language learners in order to be able to function effectively using the language. The study investigated the English language receptive vocabulary knowledge among Malaysian undergraduates in terms of word levels. The Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) by Schmitt et al., (2001) was employed in order to assess the students’ receptive vocabulary knowledge at five different word levels. The result reveals majority of the students are weak in terms of their receptive vocabulary knowledge and most of them failed to reach the mastery level for all the five word levels; 40 (57%) of the students do not master the 2000 word level, 58 (83%) of the students do not master the 3000 word level, 65 (93%) of the students do not master the 5000 word level, 70 (100%) of the students do not master the 10000 word level and 65 (93%) of the students do not master the academic word level. The findings were useful insights on the English language receptive vocabulary knowledge among Malaysian university students in terms of word levels.
References
Alfaki, I. M. 2015. Vocabulary Input in English Language Teaching: Assessing the Vocabulary Load in Spine Five. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research. 3(1): 1-14, 3(1): 1-14. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Coxhead, A. 2000. A new Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly. 34(2): 213-238.
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. 2014. The Lexical Profile of Academic Spoken English. English for Specific Purposes. 33(1): 66-76. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.08.001.
Engku Ibrahim, E. H., Othman, K., Sarudin, I., & Jariah Muhamad, A. 2013. Measuring the Vocabulary Size of Muslim Pre-University Students. World Applied Sciences Journal. 21(4): 44-49. http://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.sltl.2136.
Gilner, L. 2011. A Primer on the General Service List. Reading in a Foreign Language. 23(1): 65-83. Retrieved from http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2011/articles/gilner.pdf.
Harji, M. B., Balakrishnan, K., Bhar, S. K., & Letchumanan, K. 2015. Vocabulary Levels and Size Of Malaysian Undergraduates. English Language Teaching. 8(9): 119-130. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n9p119.
Ismail, N. A. 2011. Graduates’ Characteristics and Unemployment : A Study Among Malaysian Graduates. Journal of Business and Social Science. 2(16): 94-103.
Kaur, N. 2013. The Need for Autonomous Vocabulary Learners in the Malaysian ESL Classroom. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 13(September): 7-16.
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. 2013. Vocabulary Knowledge and Speaking Proficiency Among Second Language Learners from Novice To Intermediate Levels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 4(5): 900-913. http://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.5.900-913.
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. 2010. Lexical Threshold Revisited: Lexical Text Coverage , Learners’ Vocabulary Size and Reading Comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language. 22(1): 15-30.
Menon, S., & Patel, N. 2012. Importance of English Language in Corporate World. International Journal for Research in Management and Pharmacy. 1(1): 42-55.
Miao, L., & Kirby, J. R. 2015. The Effects of Vocabulary Breadth and Depth on English Reading. Applied Linguistics. 36(5): 611-634. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu007.
Mohd Abd Wahab, A. W. A., & Ismail, N. A. S. 2014. Communication Skills and Its Impact on the Marketability of UKM Graduates. International Journal of Higher Education. 3(4): 64-71. http://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p64.
Nation, I. S. P. 2006. How Large a Vocabulary is Needed for Reading And Listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review. 63(1): 59-82.
Nation, P. 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
Nation, P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P., & Waring, R. 2002. Vocabulary Size, Text Coverage and Word Lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.). Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. 6-19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. 2011. Researching and Analyzing Vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle.
Read, J. 2000. Assessing Vocabulary. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9780511732942.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. 2001. Developing and Exploring the Behaviour of Two Versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. 18(1): 55-88. http://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103.
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. 2011. The Percentage of Words Known in a Text and Reading Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal. 95(1): 26-43. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. 2014. A Reassessment of Frequency and Vocabulary Size in L2 Vocabulary Teaching. Language Teaching. 47(4): 484-503. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000018.
Solano, A. 2014. Vocabulary in Speaking Performance. Universidad de La Sabana. Retrieved from http://intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/10818/10409/1/Lina María Arangure Burgos(TESIS).pdf.
Thirusanku, J., & Md Yunus, M. 2014. Status of English in Malaysia. Asian Social Science. 10(14): 254-260. http://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n14p254.
Xhaferi, B., & Xhaferi, G. 2011. The English language Skills in ESP for Law Course. Revista de Lenguas Para Fines Especificos. 17(July): 431-448. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.wisc.edu/docview/1438639076?accountid=465%5Cnhttp://sfx.wisconsin.edu/wisc?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ:llbashell&atitle=The+English+language+skills+in+E.
