Using Game-based Technology, KAHOOT! for Classroom Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v5n2.77Abstract
In the recent years, numerous game-based technologies have been developed with the aim of providing fun yet meaningful experience to their users. These technologies are also common among instructors and students in the English as a Second Language (ESL) classroom since they act as supplements for effective teaching and learning. Instructors and students who are now more advanced with technology could benefit from these available game-based technologies as these technologies offer various features that could be utilized for classroom activity. As to ensure the successful implementation of the technologies, students’ engagement in the classroom where the technologies are concerned should be paid attention to. Hence, in the context of this study, the use of one game-based technology, KAHOOT in an ESL classroom was observed. The study examines the students’ level of engagement while playing KAHOOT and also looks at the students’ level of attainment towards the topic content. The study was conducted qualitatively with the participation of 29 undergraduate students. The data was collected via interviews and observations which later was analysed descriptively. The findings suggest that KAHOOT is proven to be useful in initiating and fostering students’ engagement in language learning activity and at the same time enhancing their language skills. The study hopes to provide insights for better implementation of game-based technologies in English language classroom curriculum.
References
Budiati, B. 2017. Ict (Information and Communication Technology) Use: Kahoot Program For English Students’learning Booster. In Proceedings Education and Language International Conference. 1(1).
Dellos, R. 2015. Kahoot! A Digital Game Resource for Learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 12(4): 49-52.
Graham, K. 2015. TechMatters: Getting into Kahoot!(s): Exploring a Game-based Learning System to Enhance Student Learning. LOEX Quarterly. 42(3): 4.
Icard, S. B. 2014. Educational Technology Best Practices. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 11(3): 37-41.
Johns, K. 2015. Engaging and Assessing Students with Technology: A Review of Kahoot! Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin. 81(4): 89.
Krauskopf, K., Zahn, C. & Hesse, F. W. 2012. Leveraging the Affordances of YouTube: The Role of Pedagogical Knowledge and Mental Models of Technology Functions for Lesson Planning with Technology. Computers & Education. 58(4): 1194-1206. Retrieved December 13, 2017 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/67467/.
McKinley, J. 2015. Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing (PDF). Critical Inquiry in Language Studies. 12(3): 184-207. doi:10.1080/15427587.2015.1060558.
McLeod, S. A. 2015. Observation Methods. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/observation.html.
Medina, E. G. L., & Hurtado, C. P. R. 2017. Kahoot! A Digital Tool for Learning Vocabulary in a language classroom. Revista Publicando. 4(12 (1): 441-449.
Mullen, R. and Wedwick, L. 2008. Avoiding the Digital Abyss: Getting Started in the Classroom with Youtube, Digital Stories and Blogs. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. 82(2): 66-69.
Omar, N. N. 2017. The Efffectiveness of Kahoot Application Towards Students’ Good Feedback Practice. People: International Journal of Social Sciences. 3(2).
Plump, C. M., & LaRosa, J. 2017. Using Kahoot! in the Classroom to Create Engagement and Active Learning: A Game-Based Technology Solution for eLearning Novices. Management Teaching Review. 2(2): 151-158.
Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. 2017. The Room Itself is Active: How Classroom Design Impacts Student Engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces. 6(1): 26.
Siegle, D. 2015. Technology: Learning Can Be Fun and Games. Gifted Child Today. 38(3): 192-197.
Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. 2016. Kahoot It or Not? Can Games be Motivating in Learning Grammar? Teaching English with Technology. 16(3): 17-36.
